RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,470
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
That is unless Dunn, Murray or Hield slip down to 8, however unlikely that may be. We probably hold on to the 8 until then in hopes someone falls and maybe look at trading down when we're on the clock.
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
SacKingZZZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
Poetl and Ellenson will possibly move up that draft board IMO. I'd be surprised to see no real deal bigs going until after 8.
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
skywalker33
- Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
- Posts: 14,089
- And1: 5,448
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
-
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
SacKingZZZ wrote:Poetl and Ellenson will possibly move up that draft board IMO. I'd be surprised to see no real deal bigs going until after 8.
First 3 picks are 6'9" and above....
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose
Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Re: Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
skywalker33 wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:Poetl and Ellenson will possibly move up that draft board IMO. I'd be surprised to see no real deal bigs going until after 8.
First 3 picks are 6'9" and above....
No traditional bigs first 7 picks is a sign of the times.
Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
SacKingZZZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
skywalker33 wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:Poetl and Ellenson will possibly move up that draft board IMO. I'd be surprised to see no real deal bigs going until after 8.
First 3 picks are 6'9" and above....
Yeah, as City of Trees said it may be a sign of the times, but all the taller guys up top are tweeners. If there is a team in the top 7 looking for potential and need size they'd be stupid to pass up on Ellenson by taking a redundant guard or wing that they don't need. It's the same reason I think it'd be dumb for the Kings to take on of the bigs in the back of the lotto. There is no room to even remotely fit them in.
And speaking about a sign of the times, the Warriors have had to ditch their own deathball lineup because of the legit bigs on the Thunder. Maybe that might have an effect on the draft, who knows.
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
kingman
- Ballboy
- Posts: 1
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 06, 2016
-
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
Trade down #8 for #14 with Chi Koufus for Taj Gibson take Sabonis or Vallentine.
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
-
2Mas
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,244
- And1: 4,025
- Joined: Dec 06, 2011
- Location: Long Island, NY
-
Re: RealGM 2016 Fan Forum Mock Draft - SAC #8
codydaze wrote:That is unless Dunn, Murray or Hield slip down to 8, however unlikely that may be. We probably hold on to the 8 until then in hopes someone falls and maybe look at trading down when we're on the clock.
Could see it honestly.
Phi - Simmons
Lal - Ingram
Bos - Bender
Phx - Brown (why would they take another guard?)
Min - Hield
NOP - Murray or Dunn (either or)
Den - ??? (Do they take Dunn or Murray? With Mudiay/Harris?)
Sac -- Which leads me to think Dunn might slip. Murray goes 6, maybe Chriss goes 7, & Dunn is there for Sac at 8?