bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
Yeah, too bad he's not a good free throw shooter. At all.
Omg! I missed that. I totally forgot FT shooting is the most difficult obstacle for a NBA player to improve on, especially a 19 year old.

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
Yeah, too bad he's not a good free throw shooter. At all.
JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
Yeah, too bad he's not a good free throw shooter. At all.
Omg! I missed that. I totally forgot FT shooting is the most difficult obstacle for a NBA player to improve on, especially a 19 year old.
bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Yeah, too bad he's not a good free throw shooter. At all.
Omg! I missed that. I totally forgot FT shooting is the most difficult obstacle for a NBA player to improve on, especially a 19 year old.
Exactly.
saintEscaton wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:MrMiyagi wrote:DraftExpress says "Defensive POTENTIAL" not "GREAT DEFENDER". Plus a lot of those videos of him "checking wings" are him staying like 5 feet in front of them - which is wide open in the NBA...
EDIT: Notice how all of those clips in his "Strengths" video re: defense are of drives. I'd be willing to wager he was defending players with no jump shot whatsoever, hell-bent on getting into the paint.
Exactly, because all 18 year olds defend that way. Or maybe he's just being smart and realizing his wingspan is like 7'5" and that he can bother their shot while still playing off of them to prevent the drive or an easy foul call. At this point, I think there's nothing that could possibly be shown that would have you say a positive thing about Bender. Oh, and when somebody discusses your defensive potential by showing you defending well now, that has meaning. You're being unnecessarily literal because it goes against your opinion of him.
I definitely see the intrigue of Bender and wouldn't riot if he gets past Boston and we take him. His wingpspan is 7'2 4 inches less than KP, adequate (25th percentile)but not freakish by any means KP. His standing reach ( 9'3") is elite tho (top 5% percentile) and makes up for his lack of hops, a 24 inch no step vert is underwhelmong to say the least
Mulhollanddrive wrote:College 3 point %
Curry 41
Thompson 39
Booker 41
Hield 39
We could be the only team in the NBA able to match them.
JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
Omg! I missed that. I totally forgot FT shooting is the most difficult obstacle for a NBA player to improve on, especially a 19 year old.
Exactly.
Sarcasm my friend. He is not a big. You Amare shot 66% in his first season?
Edit: and Average 76 for his career.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Exactly.
Sarcasm my friend. He is not a big. You Amare shot 66% in his first season?
Edit: and Average 76 for his career.
With centers or PFs that finish great around the rim, I can accept that to some extent. As much as Brown is touted as a great guy at the rim, he's really not, as you can see in the multiple things posted here.
Waylay13 wrote:Mulhollanddrive wrote:College 3 point %
Curry 41
Thompson 39
Booker 41
Hield 39
We could be the only team in the NBA able to match them.
I am confused as to what part of nether Booker or Hield being point guards you are missing? Hield isnt know as being a strong passer and while that is a part of Bookers game he isnt a starter level point guard.
JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:
Sarcasm my friend. He is not a big. You Amare shot 66% in his first season?
Edit: and Average 76 for his career.
With centers or PFs that finish great around the rim, I can accept that to some extent. As much as Brown is touted as a great guy at the rim, he's really not, as you can see in the multiple things posted here.
He gets to the line at will. Will that translate, don't know, but you have to have it in college first. He doesn't finish well or shoot FT's well, I get that and he can get better, but getting to the line is a skill VERY FEW players posses, so that's a good start. I thought I was pointing out a positive.
bwgood77 wrote:JMac1 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
With centers or PFs that finish great around the rim, I can accept that to some extent. As much as Brown is touted as a great guy at the rim, he's really not, as you can see in the multiple things posted here.
He gets to the line at will. Will that translate, don't know, but you have to have it in college first. He doesn't finish well or shoot FT's well, I get that and he can get better, but getting to the line is a skill VERY FEW players posses, so that's a good start. I thought I was pointing out a positive.
If he gets better at FT shooting it is. If not, there is basically no reason not to foul him when he is going up for something easy, because there is the best chance he only hits 1 for 2.
Getting to the line is great when you can hit your free throws like Durant, Westbrook and Harden.
He likely got to the line a lot because he can't hit free throws.
Another thing that stands out to me is his low steal rate, which is typically a good indicator of how good someone projects to be at the NBA level, particularly on defense.
Any eventual deal will likely depend on the potential return, but the demand should be high for either.
The Boston Celtics are one option as a team that needs a center and wants to add players who can make an impact early. With the No. 3 overall pick and plenty of young assets, they could be a reasonable fit.
John Gonzalez of CSN Philly also examined the Los Angeles Lakers, Phoenix Suns and Denver Nuggets as teams that would be able to offer the types of packages required. Then again, all of them either have young centers in place or will likely be looking for more experienced help through trades.
The Celtics still make the most sense, but you never know what could happen with so many teams likely to get involved.
Midnight_Suns wrote:Precisely why I'd take Murray. He played point for Canada and did fine. If he's BPA, you take him and find a trade for Bledsoe this year.
Waylay13 wrote:Midnight_Suns wrote:Precisely why I'd take Murray. He played point for Canada and did fine. If he's BPA, you take him and find a trade for Bledsoe this year.
You mean the game against the US under 19 group where he didnt break a single person down off the dribble? In every case that he drove it was from a pick n' roll or full court drive. I know some people have forgotten what a point guard should look like but you can always go watch Nash again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcO9wQf083Y
Waylay13 wrote:Midnight_Suns wrote:Precisely why I'd take Murray. He played point for Canada and did fine. If he's BPA, you take him and find a trade for Bledsoe this year.
You mean the game against the US under 19 group where he didnt break a single person down off the dribble? In every case that he drove it was from a pick n' roll or full court drive. I know some people have forgotten what a point guard should look like but you can always go watch Nash again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcO9wQf083Y
darealjuice wrote:Jaylen Brown is nothing but potential, he's undoubtably the least skilled player in terms of actual Basketball ability that's a consensus Top 10 pick in this draft. All this talk about his defense having elite potential is based solely off of his lateral quickness, athleticism, and wingspan, because this year he was nowhere near an elite defender against college talent. He was good at getting to the Free Throw line, but he shot pretty bad at 65% on the season, which also doesn't bode well for his 3-point shot, which was already mediocre, considering FT% is one of the best indicators for NBA 3-point shooting ability. His ball handling isn't terrible but it's still too loose, he turns the ball over way too much, and his shot isn't completely broken but it needs tightening and isn't where it needs to be.
Wow replace Jaylen Brown with Archie Goodwin and everything I said still fits