2016 draft thread: Part 2
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,616
- And1: 22,978
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
If he's got range out to the 3-point line, I'll throw Poeltl back into the mix at 5.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VtviDbZnDg[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VtviDbZnDg[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,616
- And1: 22,978
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Mattya wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIWFrk4pnOg[/youtube]
This is great to see!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- King Malta
- Starter
- Posts: 2,328
- And1: 1,554
- Joined: Jun 24, 2013
- Location: The Lottery
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
LordBaldric wrote:If the Wolves will pay me millions I'll kick opposing players in the nuts like Draymond.
I'll do it for free
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Killboard wrote:Sugarless wrote:Hard to be a good defender when you lack quickness and length.
Hield has a bigger wingspan than klay and tony allen according to draftexpress.
I know, I was talking about Murray.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
john2jer wrote:Sugarless wrote:Hard to be a good defender when you lack quickness and length.
Klay does it without either.
Not true. Klay is long, he's a big SG at 6'7'' with a 6'9'' wingspan and 8'9'' standing reach.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Mattya wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIWFrk4pnOg[/youtube]
This is great to see!
Skal has gone way too low during the season in some mock drafts. Yeah, he's struggled, he's still not too far in his development and he's really thin, but he's got too much potential with that length, fluidity and shooting mechanics to fall out of the top 7-8 spots. And he's a great, humble guy by all means. I'd even pick him at 4 if I was the Suns, I don't see why they'd take Jaylen Brown instead of him, it's not like they don't have the time to wait for Skal, or the need for a PF.
If the Timberwolves were in a different position in terms of competing right away, he'd be right up there with Hield and Bender in my list.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,616
- And1: 22,978
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Sugarless wrote:If the Timberwolves were in a different position in terms of competing right away, he'd be right up there with Hield and Bender in my list.
What do you mean by this, in regards to the PFs? You think Bender is more of a win now piece?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Sugarless wrote:If the Timberwolves were in a different position in terms of competing right away, he'd be right up there with Hield and Bender in my list.
What do you mean by this, in regards to the PFs? You think Bender is more of a win now piece?
Not win now, I don't see a PF in this draft who can give you that at #5, but he's farther ahead in his development.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Dewey
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,914
- And1: 1,078
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Lots of jabber about who on the team is untouchable. IMO, KAT is the only player I consider to be "untouchable". From here we have players who show flashes that feed that elusive tease called ... "potential". We will soon find out what players can raise the bar in terms of defense - some can be pushed - some cannot. Bazz might have the most fight - he works the boards and runs the floor far better than Wiggin and Lavine - and his 3pt shot has shown some "potential" in stretchesm and IMO, Bazz is a darkhorse with Thibs.
Draft a player who can play as a rookie - if you don't like, trade the pick. we need to push our players on the roster
Draft a player who can play as a rookie - if you don't like, trade the pick. we need to push our players on the roster
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
gopher wolf
- Sophomore
- Posts: 162
- And1: 15
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Sugarless wrote:Klomp wrote:Sugarless wrote:If the Timberwolves were in a different position in terms of competing right away, he'd be right up there with Hield and Bender in my list.
What do you mean by this, in regards to the PFs? You think Bender is more of a win now piece?
Not win now, I don't see a PF in this draft who can give you that at #5, but he's farther ahead in his development.
I think Ellenson is sort of a win now PF with his production he showed and his filled out body. I do think though that in year one, he would overlap with Bjellica quite a bit. Actually maybe not given he measured 6-11.5 with shoes and could very well be listed at 7-0.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
gopher wolf
- Sophomore
- Posts: 162
- And1: 15
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Mattya wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DWolfsonKSTP/status/737820131494006784[/tweet]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIWFrk4pnOg[/youtube]
Great! I hope he can improve his stock enough in these workouts for us to justify taking him at #5.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Sugarless
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
gopher wolf wrote:Sugarless wrote:Klomp wrote:What do you mean by this, in regards to the PFs? You think Bender is more of a win now piece?
Not win now, I don't see a PF in this draft who can give you that at #5, but he's farther ahead in his development.
I think Ellenson is sort of a win now PF with his production he showed and his filled out body. I do think though that in year one, he would overlap with Bjellica quite a bit. Actually maybe not given he measured 6-11.5 with shoes and could very well be listed at 7-0.
He may become a solid player, but I'd be a bit scared to pick Ellenson at #5. I don't see a lot of BBIQ in him, and he's going to have problems defensively with how slow he is at 19, more so as a PF.
I don't know, I think he falls between two stools, not enough to contribute right away with his lack of defense, and not enough upside as a longer term prospect. But it could be just me not liking him that much at this point.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
john2jer wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Watching Klay singlehandedly win games in the playoffs with his 3-point shooting all but locks in my love for Hield. This team needs shooting more than anything else. If Hield is off the board, I'll gladly take Murray.
Do we think Hield can be the level of a defender that Klay is?
I don't want to overhype/oversell, but yes I think so. I think the main issue with his defense was just him conserving energy for the offensive end. If he's on a team with Wiggins, Towns, and Rubio, and competing for minutes with Lavine, I see no reason why Hield can't become a very good defender, perhaps to the level of Klay.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
jpatrick
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,744
- And1: 1,965
- Joined: May 30, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I think Draft Express sometimes changes their ratings to make a splash and get people to their site, but they just moved Chriss all the way up to #3 overall.
He's the ultimate boom or bust guy.
He's the ultimate boom or bust guy.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Feilong
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,872
- And1: 1,029
- Joined: Jan 26, 2014
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
jpatrick wrote:I think Draft Express sometimes changes their ratings to make a splash and get people to their site, but they just moved Chriss all the way up to #3 overall.
He's the ultimate boom or bust guy.
This is what i wrote about him on May 20
"I like Chriss too and i think he is a Thibs type of guy.
DX has him at #11 but i think he will go up a couple of spots during workouts because he is one of the youngest (18y old).
Maybe a trade down with TOR is a possibility. #5 for #9 and #27 and pick him with the #9."
He is my #1 guy if we trade down. I think he will end somewhere between #7-10.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Killboard
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,374
- And1: 943
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
jpatrick wrote:I think Draft Express sometimes changes their ratings to make a splash and get people to their site, but they just moved Chriss all the way up to #3 overall.
He's the ultimate boom or bust guy.
It would be cool if they someway explain why those moves are made, even if they dont bring any sources, at least say based on workouts, FO opinions or their own.
I just hope his hype continues. More chances to get Bender
.Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Takingbaconback
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,952
- And1: 2,625
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Would love Chriss if he wasn't such a horrible rebounder. Maybe that is fixable since a lot of that is getting into position and boxing your man out? Seems like one of the easiest things to improve on, especially somebody with his athleticism.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,616
- And1: 22,978
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Definitely liked what I heard here...
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq-ajHhjnPg[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq-ajHhjnPg[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,433
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I love Buddy Hield!
Hope we pick him instead of Dunn
Hope we pick him instead of Dunn
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Vindicater
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,948
- And1: 423
- Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Still hoping Bender will fall.
If not happy to go with Dunn.
If not happy to go with Dunn.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves







