ImageImage

Portland - 2016 Offseason

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,359
And1: 8,067
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#741 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jun 11, 2016 10:47 pm

Jsun947 wrote:Wiz, The problem with upgrading from Plumlee to a rim protecting C is adding that other play maker in the line-up.

To complicate it even more, our offense sucks when we have two players on the floor together that can't shoot.


building a good team isn't easy. Shouldn't give up because it's not

and yes, if Portland spends money on a defensive C, they'll need to explore the trade value of Plumlee/Davis

That play maker would have to be at the PF spot (really Lebron, Griffin, and Green might be the only ones in the NBA) or would have to be a small forward.


keep in mind what you're trying to replace. It's not like Plumlee is Steve Nash. He had a 16.2% assist rate this season (bbref). Al Horford has beat that in 3 different seasons and has 2 other seasons when he was over 15%. Kevin Love acted as a playmaker for Minny his last season there and had 21.4% assist rate and a per36 mark of 4.4 compared to Plumlee's 3.9.

Plumlee averaged 2.8 assists/game this year. Even if the 'new' C only averages 1, that doesn't leave a big number of assists to make up. Dwight Howard has averaged 1.5 in his career

So really that leaves two options

Play making SF who can shoot + Defensive center
Or
Defensive Center who can shoot + play making SF


I think you're narrowing the options too much. Neither Plumlee nor Davis can shoot. We're talking about the possibility of replacing one of those two C's in Portland's rotation. The C wouldn't have to shoot jumpers.

Blazers might just need a player in the wing rotation who is moderately good at play-making. They had one who is excellent in Batum but he's gone now. I think that's why Evan Turner gets mentioned a lot here. He can't shoot but he's a play maker and a good defender
Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,827
And1: 2,343
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#742 » by Dame Lizard » Sun Jun 12, 2016 4:16 am

Wizenheimer wrote:Plumlee only has one year left on his rookie deal, same as CJ. Portland's roster could get ridiculously expensive over the next 14 months if they don't make some hard decisions


This has been my thinking all along. Plumlee gets expensive just when our team looks like it's ready to take the next step.

I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.

On the plus side though, he did help us have this cracking playoff run.
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#743 » by Jsun947 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 4:28 am

We are extremelly unlikely to get Horford though and even more unlikely to get Love. I think Boston is very unlikely to retain Turner though and he's the only obtainable play making SF for us on the market.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,567
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#744 » by tester551 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 4:37 am

Jsun947 wrote:We are extremelly unlikely to get Horford though and even more unlikely to get Love. I think Boston is very unlikely to retain Turner though and he's the only obtainable play making SF for us on the market.

Im still pushing the Tyreke Evens idea. S&T Meyers to NO for Tyreke
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,468
And1: 2,214
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#745 » by Norm2953 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 6:38 am

All bigs if they can do anything on the court get paid. I would find it unlikely Plumlee will get
that overpaid next summer when he becomes a RFA but for now, he's a good fit with the
current roster.
esm1885
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 14
Joined: May 03, 2016

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#746 » by esm1885 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:46 am

Yo guys Twolves fan here, just wondering are the blazers likely to resign harkless this offseason with his restricted free agency? How big of a contract would another team have to offer for the blazers not to match?
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#747 » by Masterfully » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:48 pm

esm1885 wrote:Yo guys Twolves fan here, just wondering are the blazers likely to resign harkless this offseason with his restricted free agency? How big of a contract would another team have to offer for the blazers not to match?

I don't know what management is thinking, but of our free agents he is 1b or 2 on my priority list. I'd think an offer around $15 M would make our FO hesitant about matching.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,176
And1: 3,126
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#748 » by PDXKnight » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:20 pm

Dame Lizard wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:Plumlee only has one year left on his rookie deal, same as CJ. Portland's roster could get ridiculously expensive over the next 14 months if they don't make some hard decisions


This has been my thinking all along. Plumlee gets expensive just when our team looks like it's ready to take the next step.

I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.

On the plus side though, he did help us have this cracking playoff run.


The plumlee trade made absolute sense at the time imo. 2 years of a rookie deal left and we got him for a late first round pick that probably wasn't gonna be a superstar. And honestly I'm not sure there are better options at center that are attainable unless we draft one or do a lopsided trade for one so we may be left with no choice but to extend him
Downtown
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 578
Joined: Jun 30, 2001

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#749 » by Downtown » Sun Jun 12, 2016 5:51 pm

Yeah everything is easy in hindsight. But at the time I thought trading for Plumlee made sense.

You can't look back and say what if we would have signed Biyumbo to a four year deal at $8mil a year which he likely would have taken over the $2mil one he signed with Toronto. Then we could have kept RHJ. But then we may not have signed Aminu because we might have still traded for Harkless.

You see it's not a simple case of should've, could've,would've.

Yesterday's history. Tomorrow's a mystery. Today is a gift. :D
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,205
And1: 4,269
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#750 » by JasonStern » Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Oden2 wrote:I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.


the Blazers traded the #23 pick for Plumlee, #41, and dumped Steve Blake's contract. that was a solid trade value-wise.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#751 » by Tim Lehrbach » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:28 pm

Not sure if he's been brought up already, but David West is declining his second-year option and will be a free agent. After giving up vast sums to unsuccessfully ring-chase with the Spurs, maybe he'd take a nice payday with the Blazers? He's still quite good all-around, and he maintained his health and conditioning throughout the season despite the limited role. Instead of Horford, Howard, or Whiteside, who probably aren't coming here anyway, maybe you can get West for less than half the price (and years) and still have boatloads of money to chase Ezeli, Biyombo, Pachulia, or another second-tier FA center I'm forgetting. Getting two guys would open up trade options for Davis, Plumlee, and Vonleh and allow Harkless (if kept) to stay a bench player. I suggested trading Vonleh for Korver, which is probably a reach, but some sort of big-for-small trade could get the Blazers either a competent backup point guard or a tougher wing, while also preventing a dangerous overpay of Crabbe or Henderson. Just some thoughts.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,827
And1: 2,343
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Re: Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#752 » by Dame Lizard » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:27 pm

JasonStern wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.


the Blazers traded the #23 pick for Plumlee, #41, and dumped Steve Blake's contract. that was a solid trade value-wise.


It sounds more impactive if you replace "23rd pick" with "best defender in the draft, who is a freak athlete".

Andre Roberson made a very nice impact on the WCF doing exactly what RHJ does, whilst RHJ is 3-4 years younger.

RHJ and Aminu could work superbly in a lineup alongside Dame, CJ and a centre like RoLo (or Aldrich given the situation we are in now).

I was super excited as he was the first elite defender we had drafted since ......... I've lost count.
Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,827
And1: 2,343
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#753 » by Dame Lizard » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:28 pm

Happy for Olshey to fix that defensive need in the 2016 draft though! ;)
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,359
And1: 8,067
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Re: Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#754 » by Wizenheimer » Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:28 am

Dame Lizard wrote:
JasonStern wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.


the Blazers traded the #23 pick for Plumlee, #41, and dumped Steve Blake's contract. that was a solid trade value-wise.


It sounds more impactive if you replace "23rd pick" with "best defender in the draft, who is a freak athlete".

Andre Roberson made a very nice impact on the WCF doing exactly what RHJ does, whilst RHJ is 3-4 years younger.

RHJ and Aminu could work superbly in a lineup alongside Dame, CJ and a centre like RoLo (or Aldrich given the situation we are in now).

I was super excited as he was the first elite defender we had drafted since ......... I've lost count.


while the trade was justifiable at the time, and still is.....the notion of having Aminu, Harkless, and RHJ as a perimeter defensive trio is extremely appealing. Now, maybe that would end up being too many bricks from the three, but the length and defensive versatility would make up for some low efficiency offense
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,617
And1: 6,612
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#755 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Tue Jun 14, 2016 5:36 pm

Dame Lizard wrote:Happy for Olshey to fix that defensive need in the 2016 draft though! ;)


Brogdon? Its a great year to be trying to acquire a late 1st, with Boston and Philadelphia both having too many picks and too many youngsters already.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,079
And1: 3,640
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#756 » by zzaj » Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:30 pm

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:Happy for Olshey to fix that defensive need in the 2016 draft though! ;)


Brogdon? Its a great year to be trying to acquire a late 1st, with Boston and Philadelphia both having too many picks and too many youngsters already.


Not to mention a fairly deep draft that seems like it will have some players that can contribute right away off the bench, Brogdon included...
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,176
And1: 3,126
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#757 » by PDXKnight » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:18 pm

JasonStern wrote:
Oden2 wrote:I have been a fan of a lot of things Olshey has done, but trading for Plumlee was nonsensical imo.


the Blazers traded the #23 pick for Plumlee, #41, and dumped Steve Blake's contract. that was a solid trade value-wise.


This isn't my quote :wink:
GreenRiddler
General Manager
Posts: 9,747
And1: 1,444
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Blazer fan from Toronto
     

Re: Re: Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#758 » by GreenRiddler » Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:37 am

Dame Lizard wrote:I was super excited as he was the first elite defender we had drafted since ......... I've lost count.

I would say Aminu is a elite defender. In hindsight now I have to agree with y'all. I was iffy about that trade but not sure at the time. Plumlee now is a decent backup big, whereas Ed is the same kind of better backup big. Pat isn't doing anything tbh.

Wish we could turn back the clock on that one.
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,285
And1: 1,409
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#759 » by cucad8 » Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:20 pm

Opinion sure has soured on plumlee again here. I'll take a good upgrade if there is one, but I don't feel it's nearly as important as many seem to. I hope he works on that 15 foot jumper this offseason, would be a huge weapon for him.
Just seems like "rim protector" has become the new drum to beat ad nauseum here and elsewhere.
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,617
And1: 6,612
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#760 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:25 pm

I was 100% on the RHJ train and super stoked that he fell to us and then totally bummed to see we traded him to the Nets.

Plumlee did more for us this year than Hollis-Jefferson would have, but I think the gap will close between them sooner rather than later.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers