Geaux_Hawks wrote:So question. What's actually being argued here?
A sampling of some of the more...polarizing statements made here:
atlantabbq99 wrote: If you swap out Teague for Kyrie, i think at best it only improves the team by 1 win.
Rip2137 wrote:Kyrie isn't elite talent. For the money he makes and what you would have to give up for a injury prone, no defense playing, consistent loser as the alpha dog on his team.
Rip2137 wrote:...we would have beaten the Cavs if Love and Irving played. I [can't] believe you have watched a 1-4 pick and roll against the Cavs and think we wouldn't have been better off with their better offensive team playing versus the elite defensive squad they were able to put out there.
hawkschop1 wrote:Is Kyrie even coach-able?
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Kyrie is an overrated bum and Teague once again outplayed him on Saturday night. Teague +18, Kyrie -13.
All flash, no substance. I want no part of giving up big assets just to overpay a stat padder.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:... I wouldn't mind facing Cleveland in the playoffs with a healthy Kyrie and Love. Teague and Millsap straight abused both of them all night and the same will happen in the playoffs...Kyrie is a non-factor all the time and Love is a non-factor when Kyrie is playing.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:1 million excuses won't change the fact that Kyrie Irving doesn't play winning basketball. All flash, no substance. That is what Kyrie has been and what he will continue to be.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Al Horford's play results in more wins for his team than Kyrie's does. There is a 5 page thread on the gen board right now which suggests that the Cavs would be better off with Delly starting.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Exactly Delly, really. A slow role player has been far more productive for the Cavs this season than superstar elite all-world Irving.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Kyrie is a less talented, undersized and far more injury prone version of James Har_en. Lou Williams with fancier handles.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Good luck on trying to paint a picture of Kyrie being the reason why the Cavs swept us when Dennis or Teague matched his production in every game other than game 2.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:Let's add another prediction.
Lebron and Kyrie will not play for the same team next year. Either Lebron ditches Cleveland or LeGM has Kyrie shipped away.
ATLHawksfan21 wrote:...I don't think the Clippers would even entertain the Kyrie for Paul talk after seeing how Kyrie has fared against the Warriors. Kyrie would struggle badly in a Western conference playoff that features Curry, Westbrook and Lillard.
PandaKidd wrote:FYI I don't care what analytics say, Kyrie is a better player than teague, no question, ever. People arguing for delevedova over KI are fools
PandaKidd wrote:I mean people see what they want to see. KI is just much more talented than any PG we have, period. Love is still REALLY REALLY good.
Jamaaliver wrote:...it's clear KI is fitting in pretty well with this adjusted CAVS offense. He is an offensive weapon of elite talent, just approaching his prime and is being deployed properly in a surprisingly efficient system...
Jamaaliver wrote:I'm doubling down. For a star, All Star, All NBA PG entering his prime, I'd give up pretty much anything on this roster. I'd love to see our staff (minus Kenny Atkinson

) get a shot at developing KI into a franchise player...I'll take KI all day, every day.
Jamaaliver wrote:KI has proven...against every opponent this postseason...just how effective he can be.
You can make the argument that he's outplayed Curry thus far in the Finals.