ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion

Moderators: Danny Darko, TyCobb, Kilroy

Who will the Lakers pick?

Ben Simmons
47
25%
Brandon Ingram
111
59%
Other
31
16%
 
Total votes: 189

Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,603
And1: 12,316
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#921 » by Kilroy » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:38 am

I think if they trade Russ it's not going to be just for another top 5 pick, it's going to be part of a much larger deal.
Swapping Hield for Russ would be a lateral move at best.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Head Coach
Posts: 7,053
And1: 1,780
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#922 » by Mirjalovic » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:45 am

People talk about trade Randle that, trade Randle this, but its seems Lakers FO high on Randle's potential and rightly so.

I think it's not Hield for Russell anyway, must be someone else


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Sixers fans...

Image
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,139
And1: 33,841
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#923 » by Slava » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:48 am

Ford is making a massive leap from the idea that we are working out more than one prospect for that spot.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#924 » by iamworthy » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:55 am

Mirjalovic wrote:People talk about trade Randle that, trade Randle this, but its seems Lakers FO high on Randle's potential and rightly so.

I think it's not Hield for Russell anyway, must be someone else


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Honestly there's no real way to figure out who the lakers are high on. Mitch said no one is untouchable on this team.
Image
MrWaffles
Rookie
Posts: 1,002
And1: 225
Joined: Sep 15, 2015

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#925 » by MrWaffles » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:03 am

Russell > anyone in the draft this year.

Buddy has no business starting on the Lakers. Clarkson is ours to keep so no need for Buddy. Ingram fits our roster perfectly. We need a wing that can score and defend. INGRAM CAN DO THAT AND HES STILL 18 AND GROWING

INGRAM


INGRAM

INGRAM


INGRAM
lake_show
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,868
And1: 476
Joined: Nov 20, 2005
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#926 » by lake_show » Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:25 am

Too much time between the Lottery and the Draft. Reporters are starting to get creative in the ways they're trying to fill the space by coming up with some random rumors. Trading D'Lo to try to get Heild, because D'Lo filmed something he should'nt have... LOL C'mon man. GTFOH!!!

99.9999% Simmons goes 1, Ingram goes 2, no one gets traded. Easy draft. Bring on free agency.
Talking about how bad Julius Randle is:
DEEP3CL wrote:... When dudes know ball we're just going to call out what we see period.
User avatar
Danny Darko
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 18,676
And1: 6,012
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
         

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#927 » by Danny Darko » Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:47 am

Slava wrote:Ford is making a massive leap from the idea that we are working out more than one prospect for that spot.


Ford's whole breakdown is that Simmons put on 20 lbs and Ingram is skinny... this wreaks of him either having an agenda or being a total tool who thinks weight=talent.

I think agenda... Ford said this before Durant was drafted:

He is the most talented prospect in the draft. He has it all: size, athleticism and a beautiful jump shot. But will someone really take him over Oden?


Ford on Simmons vs Ingram *warning explicit over man crush on Simmons physique and hypercritical analysis of Ingram based solely on physique ahead.
Image
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,662
And1: 23,970
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#928 » by dockingsched » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:48 pm

That extra workout with the Lakers is really moving the needle on Hield's perceived value, people talking about the lakers offering up DLo just to get another pick to get Hield, crazy.

To me it seems like it's as simple as the Lakers doing Rob Pelinka a favor or Pelinka cashing in a favor. You don't work as Kobes agent for so long and not build up some type of long favor backlog with the front office.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,165
And1: 6,811
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#929 » by Michael Lucky » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:13 pm

Hield isn't even likely to go in the top 5 and will likely land at 7 or 8. Ford's credibility is about as good as Magic's commentary.

Also goes to show you how terrible the drop off is at 3 when people like a senior in Kris Dunn are being considered for it. At that point i just take my chances on Murray or Brown and hope they by miracle achieve their ceilings.
User avatar
myersia
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 788
Joined: Feb 08, 2011
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#930 » by myersia » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:29 pm

Michael Lucky wrote:Hield isn't even likely to go in the top 5 and will likely land at 7 or 8. Ford's credibility is about as good as Magic's commentary.

Also goes to show you how terrible the drop off is at 3 when people like a senior in Kris Dunn are being considered for it. At that point i just take my chances on Murray or Brown and hope they by miracle achieve their ceilings.


It's strange that now its frowned upon to stay in college and develop and mature. Half of these young stars in the NBA could have benefited from maturing a little bit. The media often overhypes the top pick as well. Honestly in this draft anyone could be a bust easily. This isn't 84,96,03 this year. Simmons and Ingram are a gamble just like the others. They just appear to have the most potential.
Michael Lucky
RealGM
Posts: 15,165
And1: 6,811
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
       

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#931 » by Michael Lucky » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:36 pm

When they are putting better numbers as freshmen than a senior considered to go in the draft right after them, it isn't as much of a gamble. That's simply a huge difference in talent level. Kris Dunn was averaging 6/3 in 27mpg as a freshmen for crying out loud. I'd love to speculate what Ingram's and Simmons numbers as 4 year college players would be. Probably somewhere around 25-30 points 10-15 rebounds a game. lol
DNP-Old
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 373
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: Too far from home.

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#932 » by DNP-Old » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:53 pm

Have they taken anyone other than Ingram out to dinner before their workout? Ingram is the only one I've read about (I'm sure they would have done this for Simmons as well and the fact I haven't read any dinners by no means says they didn't happen). Last year several players got the dinner treatment. I think they are locked in on the top two. I doubt they are looking to trade down but are doing their due diligence on other top picks in case an offer comes along that they feel they can not pass up. They need to know who they would want in such a case.
"Be quick, don't hurry" -John Wooden-

"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth" -Plato-
User avatar
ArC_man
Veteran
Posts: 2,982
And1: 910
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
Location: UCLA
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#933 » by ArC_man » Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:44 pm

Why do people still listen to Ford after his sources and rumors have been proven wrong year after year?
MrWaffles
Rookie
Posts: 1,002
And1: 225
Joined: Sep 15, 2015

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#934 » by MrWaffles » Sun Jun 19, 2016 7:23 pm

rsrii wrote:Have they taken anyone other than Ingram out to dinner before their workout? Ingram is the only one I've read about (I'm sure they would have done this for Simmons as well and the fact I haven't read any dinners by no means says they didn't happen). Last year several players got the dinner treatment. I think they are locked in on the top two. I doubt they are looking to trade down but are doing their due diligence on other top picks in case an offer comes along that they feel they can not pass up. They need to know who they would want in such a case.


Ingram had dinner twice with the Lakers. Lakers bringing in Buddy is simply what you said, doing their homework. Buddy and Kobe have the same agent and I'm sure Kobe pushed for Mitch to bring him in. Buddy didn't even have a good workout yesterday..

Additionally, teams share the expenses of bringing players from team to team for workouts. Lakers staying in good terms with Suns Wolves etc.
tlifeset
Pro Prospect
Posts: 893
And1: 92
Joined: May 24, 2005
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#935 » by tlifeset » Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:11 pm

Its probably a mix between due diligence, agent favors and keeping other teams on their toes.

But one thing to consider... If the Lakers do trade #2 for an all-star caliber player (the only way they are trading it) then the other team has to give the lakers a 1st round pick - its a weird rule from the cba because they didnt have a pick last year. So, there is a chance they could be pursuing cousins and the #8 pick. Obviously would take more than 2, but just a thought.
User avatar
AcecardZ
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,770
And1: 541
Joined: May 09, 2011
Location: Watching the Lakers play basketball...

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#936 » by AcecardZ » Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:27 pm

The Lakers had a first round pick last year and have one this year but they don't have a guaranteed pick for next year and that's probably why they'd need a first round this year if they trade away the #2.

At this point there's nobody we can reasonably trade this year's first round pick for that I'd want instead of the pick. Having a superstar on your team is just too important not to gamble on Ingram becoming one.
Sometimes being wrong is awesome!!! :D
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 24,460
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#937 » by Pointgod » Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:29 pm

I refuse to believe that the front office would mess up the easiest decision of the season by picking Hield over Ingram. If you're going to make the dumbest decision of the draft at least trade to get more assets. I have faith in the Lakers on this considering that they bucked the traditional big man trend last year and picked the playet with the most potential.
jcsunsfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,477
And1: 4,829
Joined: Dec 20, 2006
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#938 » by jcsunsfan » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:15 am

Sorry to butt into this discussion. Ingram is so intriguing with that length, but I have to believe Hield is a guaranteed all-star. It would take guts to take Hield over Ingram. I don't think I would do it, but I could see them thinking about it.

Good luck.
jay51024
Pro Prospect
Posts: 979
And1: 643
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#939 » by jay51024 » Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:59 am

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4aG13dR3IQ&feature=youtu.be[/youtube]
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,253
And1: 9,958
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#940 » by TyCobb » Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:44 am

If we strike out in free agency, then this dude is gonna make it real easy to get over it. I'm hyped.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers