2016 draft thread: Part 2
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- _AIJ_
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,091
- And1: 4,619
- Joined: Oct 15, 2008
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Bender wont be good. Go with the guards and sign bigs in FA
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Krapinsky wrote:Wasn't Klomp the #1 Stauskas fan?
No, he wasn't.
He liked him, but he was 100% on LaVine when the majority of posters were begging for Gary Harris.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Thibodeau/Layden Pre-Draft Press Conference
http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/video/teams/timberwolves/draft-press-conference-2016
http://www.nba.com/timberwolves/video/teams/timberwolves/draft-press-conference-2016
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- RocketsHero
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 931
- And1: 121
- Joined: Apr 18, 2007
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
http://www.1500espn.com/news/2016/06/no-surprise-wolves-brain-trust-offers-up-little-information-with-draft-approaching/
Some tidbits on Thibs and Rubio
Some tidbits on Thibs and Rubio
One Win at a Time
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- King Malta
- Starter
- Posts: 2,328
- And1: 1,554
- Joined: Jun 24, 2013
- Location: The Lottery
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Wasn't Klomp the #1 Stauskas fan?
No, he wasn't.
He liked him, but he was 100% on LaVine when the majority of posters were begging for Gary Harris.
Oh no, Klomp's starting referring to himself in the third person.

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Wasn't Klomp the #1 Stauskas fan?
No, he wasn't.
He liked him, but he was 100% on LaVine when the majority of posters were begging for Gary Harris.
If only we did Big Boards where we were able to rank players....
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1323478&start=60#start_here
Klomp wrote:Moving this along since next vote would either be the 5th vote for Saric or the 10th vote in which case it would still be Saric
1. Wiggins
2. Embiid
3. Parker
4. Exum
5. Gordon
6. Randle
7. Vonleh
8. Smart
9. Saric
10. Stauskas (1)
Better yet, here's you admitting you were "probably the biggest Stauskas fan here"
Klomp wrote:I agree that Stauskas would be a better fit, but he's also a lesser talent. I'm probably the biggest Stauskas fan here, but he's no Marcus Smart.
viewtopic.php?t=1297200&start=880
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
King Malta wrote:Oh no, Klomp's starting referring to himself in the third person.
He is!

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- King Malta
- Starter
- Posts: 2,328
- And1: 1,554
- Joined: Jun 24, 2013
- Location: The Lottery
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:King Malta wrote:Oh no, Klomp's starting referring to himself in the third person.
He is!
Someone needs to reset the database!!

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Sugarless wrote:Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:I'm starting to flip flop between Murray and Hield. Coin flip for me.
One offers combo guard potential, the other doesn't.
One offers length to improve his defensive impact, the other one doesn't.
Length isn't everything.
Thibodeau did a pretty good job with a wing who has an even worse wingspan (in comparison to his height) than Murray.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Takingbaconback
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,952
- And1: 2,625
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I think Murray's defensive abilities are being undermined. He isn't the fastest or the longest but he is very cerebral, understands tempo extremely well, and knows angles.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
kmgarnett21 wrote:vagelis wrote:Why not Jaylen Brown?
He is 19, talented and great athlete.
A duo of Wiggins and Brown can dominate in the wings, in both offense and defense.
As RationalGaze said, Brown is all athlete...you could even say ONLY athlete with very few basketball skills. He was waaaaaay too inconsistent this past year, even for a freshman. I just don't see him translating to anything more than a freaky athletic wing at the end of someone's bench.
To be honest, I don't want us to draft Brown but I would understand it. Sometimes, it's better to take the guy who has the athletic tools to do what you want than to draft someone who is decent at doing what you want but doesn't have the athletic tools to take it to the next level.
If Thibodeau thinks he can turn Brown's athletic gifts into something special and improve his basketball skills along the way, then I have no problem with it. I can say the same thing about basically anyone currently mocked in the lottery. If Thibs thinks he can turn them into a star then who am I to question it? I'm not sifting over hours of game film analyzing everything these players do. I'm not in the interview rooms getting a sense for these players' BBIQs or inner drives to succeed. I'm not on the practice courts putting these players through workouts.
Thibodeau and Layden know far more about these players than you and I do. And with a competent coach at hand, I have a lot of confidence that he'll turn whoever the pick is into a good pro.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- King Malta
- Starter
- Posts: 2,328
- And1: 1,554
- Joined: Jun 24, 2013
- Location: The Lottery
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:kmgarnett21 wrote:vagelis wrote:Why not Jaylen Brown?
He is 19, talented and great athlete.
A duo of Wiggins and Brown can dominate in the wings, in both offense and defense.
As RationalGaze said, Brown is all athlete...you could even say ONLY athlete with very few basketball skills. He was waaaaaay too inconsistent this past year, even for a freshman. I just don't see him translating to anything more than a freaky athletic wing at the end of someone's bench.
To be honest, I don't want us to draft Brown but I would understand it. Sometimes, it's better to take the guy who has the athletic tools to do what you want than to draft someone who is decent at doing what you want but doesn't have the athletic tools to take it to the next level.
If Thibodeau thinks he can turn Brown's athletic gifts into something special and improve his basketball skills along the way, then I have no problem with it. I can say the same thing about basically anyone currently mocked in the lottery. If Thibs thinks he can turn them into a star then who am I to question it? I'm not sifting over hours of game film analyzing everything these players do. I'm not in the interview rooms getting a sense for these players' BBIQs or inner drives to succeed. I'm not on the practice courts putting these players through workouts.
Thibodeau and Layden know far more about these players than you and I do. And with a competent coach at hand, I have a lot of confidence that he'll turn whoever the pick is into a good pro.
Yeah, hard to disagree with that.
Personally, I'm just more relaxed about this draft (as opposed to most others where we have a highish pick, so just about every year

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Takingbaconback wrote:I think Murray's defensive abilities are being undermined. He isn't the fastest or the longest but he is very cerebral, understands tempo extremely well, and knows angles.
I agree. And I think his cerebral nature is worth noting. Going off that, something Thibs said in the presser today caught my attention.
"Winners come in all different personality types. Sometimes you may think because a guy is quiet, he's not a fierce competitor. And then you dig deeper, you see that guy has a lot of mental toughness. But because he's not screaming, often times the guys doing the screaming aren't getting things done too, so I think you (have to) sift through all that."
To me, that fits Murray to a T. (and also Wiggins too)
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2NSB8nid24[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,697
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Nov 13, 2012
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Man Thibs and Layden are pros at being Vague
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Takingbaconback
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,952
- And1: 2,625
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
And Murray moves fluidly and is sneaky athletic on top of his mental acumen. He's got a lot of herky jerky and wiggle to him. I think Hield has less potential on defense cuz he's undersized as a 2 and is more locked in the joints.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckBVylRNpMc[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckBVylRNpMc[/youtube]
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,108
- And1: 22,627
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Takingbaconback wrote:I think Hield has less potential on defense cuz he's undersized as a 2 and is more locked in the joints.
Just to dispel this, Hield is both taller and longer than Murray.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Takingbaconback
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,952
- And1: 2,625
- Joined: Jun 22, 2013
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Takingbaconback wrote:I think Hield has less potential on defense cuz he's undersized as a 2 and is more locked in the joints.
Just to dispel this, Hield is both taller and longer than Murray.
I only say that because I see Murray as primarily a 1 on the wolves and Hield is obviously a 2.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- horaceworthy
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,650
- And1: 250
- Joined: Jan 17, 2006
- Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Krapinsky wrote:Wasn't Klomp the #1 Stauskas fan?
You're confusing Klomp with Vivek Ranadive.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEK_d-SFfCQ[/youtube]
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,526
- And1: 2,211
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
Klomp wrote:Sugarless wrote:Klomp wrote:One offers combo guard potential, the other doesn't.
One offers length to improve his defensive impact, the other one doesn't.
Length isn't everything.
Thibodeau did a pretty good job with a wing who has an even worse wingspan (in comparison to his height) than Murray.
Of course it isn't everything. It is one more tool and it isn't a given that Hield will be a better defender than Murray, just like it isn't a given than Murray will be able to play the point in the NBA. You were talking about potential, and so was I.
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,086
- And1: 3,620
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2
I really hope that Sixers - Celtics trade of Okafor or Noel for #3 gets completed and the Sixers select Dunn.
That would mean we are guaranteed to get one of Murray and Bender.
That would mean we are guaranteed to get one of Murray and Bender.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves