ImageImageImage

Who should we take at 3?

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Who do you take at 3?

Dunn
24
21%
Murray
9
8%
Hield
11
9%
Chriss
5
4%
Poeltl
5
4%
Bender
35
30%
Brown
16
14%
Jake Layman
12
10%
 
Total votes: 117

User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,936
And1: 11,423
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#61 » by greenroom31 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:30 pm

I really just don't see Dunn having star potential. His offensive game is super limited in my opinion. He tries to be flashy, turns the ball over too much, was a mediocre-at-best finisher in college and can't shoot. I can see him getting the Rondo treatment in the NBA and becoming a turnover machine. There's no doubt he can play D, but I don't want (and we don't need) another defensive specialist this high in the draft. I view his ceiling as a bigger (but a little slower), worse shooting Bledsoe.

Brown I can at least see the argument that he's young and has the size to become a star if he can fix a few things and mature, so I'm starting to come around to (i.e. rationalize) the idea that he may be the pick.

My preference is still Murray. He has the best mechanics by far and is one of the youngest players in the draft. He's a pure scorer who can shoot off the dribble, coming off screens, off the catch, and is shifty enough to get by people. He also has a great handle and is a good passer (although he wasn't really given the chance to show it at UK). He's also extremely mentally tough and has a knack for hitting big shots.

The knock on Murray is lateral quickness. I can live with that. We have enough other good defenders to help cover for him and we can find others to assist if needed. Ainge and the C's continually err on the side of defense over offense, and I think it's time to try going the other way. I believe Murray can be a decent defender in time and he has a good motor and is a decent rebounder for a guard.

Unfortunately I'm pretty confident we're not taking him so............... dammit. :(

I re-watched the Draftexpress videos for Dunn and Brown last night to try to talk myself into either of them but it's a struggle. Guess I'll just have to hope a meaningful trade emerges before 7:30!
User avatar
DorfonCeltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,680
And1: 215
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#62 » by DorfonCeltics » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:52 pm

I'm going with Bender with this pick. Murray is a close 2nd but Dragan's upside is too high

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,326
And1: 61,643
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: â–¼VIIâ–²VIII
         

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#63 » by Froob » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:01 pm

Dunn shot 37% from 3 is that misleading? I hear people saying he can't shoot?
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
TheMartian
General Manager
Posts: 8,917
And1: 6,720
Joined: Oct 13, 2004
 

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#64 » by TheMartian » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:02 pm

Top 3 choices for me are still Murray, Bender, Dunn in that order, but based on what we've been hearing so far, the pick looks to be Dunn.
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,028
And1: 4,974
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#65 » by threrf23 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:31 pm

Froob wrote:Dunn shot 37% from 3 is that misleading? I hear people saying he can't shoot?


But he was over 21 and didn't take a really high quantity of 3s. He also shot 70% from the FT line which isn't overly encouraging and he showed little upside as a shooter before turning 21. It's not that he can't shoot per se, but it is not a strength of his right now.

(ETA - Jason Kidd was a similar FT shooter in college and a better 3 point shooter in college although he never dealt with shoulder issues)
The Corey's
RealGM
Posts: 12,769
And1: 8,543
Joined: Jan 29, 2006

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#66 » by The Corey's » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:42 pm

We HAVE to take Dunn.

It appears that Philly REALLY wants him and that another unnamed team does as well.

Create a bidding war. If the worst thing to happen is we have an extra guard than whatever. We've done worse
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#67 » by Darth Celtic » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:43 pm

Dunn to force a trade.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,326
And1: 61,643
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: â–¼VIIâ–²VIII
         

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#68 » by Froob » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:48 pm

Dunn would he fun, as after he hits game winning shots can say "ya Dunn son!"
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,582
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#69 » by theman » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:25 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:Dunn to force a trade.

and when that trade is not forth coming? The Celtics are stuck with another mediocre guard and the knowledge that other teams can play the smoke blowing game.
"Just because you like my stuff doesn't mean I owe you anything." - Bob Dylan

"All this talk about equality. The only thing people really have in common is that they are all going to die." - Bob Dylan
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#70 » by Darth Celtic » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:26 pm

Then you trade Smart/Rozier
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,396
And1: 70,127
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#71 » by Celts17Pride » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:33 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:Dunn to force a trade.

of Smart. Please!
BannersOnly
Starter
Posts: 2,486
And1: 1,676
Joined: May 27, 2010

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#72 » by BannersOnly » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:42 pm

If Danny has Dunn as clearly the best player available when we pick than he is a fool if he passes him up simply because ham and eggers like Smart and Rozier are flooding this roster along with IT at the point. Makes no sense. Dunn will be a Top 5 PG in this league and an all star for years in my opinion. The kid has size, toughness, excellent passing ability, ferocious defense and he has passion. Kid will be a STUD. Make no doubt about it. It's either Dunn or Brown tonight for me if we keep the #3 pick. Anyone else and Ainge is going to look like a fool in 3 years. Frankly, I'd be shipping Smart's ass outta town tonight and bringing Dunn in to run the fn point and put IT back as the 6th man where he belongs.
User avatar
username_taken
Veteran
Posts: 2,811
And1: 2,484
Joined: Aug 23, 2014
Location: Massachusetts
       

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#73 » by username_taken » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:50 pm

I'm going Bender. His size and versatility are things this team lacks, and his upside is high as well. With the position the Celtics are in, you need to gamble on a player that could boom or bust, and I think Bender is the right guy. Plus, I think his floor is higher than some of the other guys considered towards the top like Brown.
24istheLAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,798
And1: 5,031
Joined: Jul 09, 2012
     

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#75 » by 24istheLAW » Thu Jun 23, 2016 4:59 pm

Evan Turner played 28 minutes a game last season and he's gone. So for the life of me I don't get why picking Kris Dunn means the Celtics have too many guards. Who else is going to get those 28 mins? RJ Hunter?
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,582
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#76 » by theman » Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:07 pm

BannersOnly wrote:...
Dunn will be a Top 5 PG in this league and an all star for years in my opinion.


I'll take that bet.

BannersOnly wrote: It's either Dunn or Brown tonight for me if we keep the #3 pick.


Those are the two top tier guys I do not want.
"Just because you like my stuff doesn't mean I owe you anything." - Bob Dylan

"All this talk about equality. The only thing people really have in common is that they are all going to die." - Bob Dylan
BannersOnly
Starter
Posts: 2,486
And1: 1,676
Joined: May 27, 2010

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#77 » by BannersOnly » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:24 pm

theman wrote:
BannersOnly wrote:...
Dunn will be a Top 5 PG in this league and an all star for years in my opinion.


I'll take that bet.

BannersOnly wrote: It's either Dunn or Brown tonight for me if we keep the #3 pick.


Those are the two top tier guys I do not want.


We'll see my friend.......Im glad you ain't the GM. Dunn and Brown are two way players with top shelf athleticsm and bodies for their position. Neither will be a bust and both will be STUDS especially if they land here under Stevens.
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,582
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#78 » by theman » Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:05 pm

BannersOnly wrote:
theman wrote:
BannersOnly wrote:...
Dunn will be a Top 5 PG in this league and an all star for years in my opinion.


I'll take that bet.

BannersOnly wrote: It's either Dunn or Brown tonight for me if we keep the #3 pick.


Those are the two top tier guys I do not want.


We'll see my friend.......Im glad you ain't the GM. Dunn and Brown are two way players with top shelf athleticsm and bodies for their position. Neither will be a bust and both will be STUDS especially if they land here under Stevens.


I keep hearing this. Then I started to think. Which rookie has Stevens developed into a stud? Sullinger? Olynyk? Smart? James Young? Stevens has been great with the players acquired in trade but play development doesn't seem to be a strong point. Which seems weird since he came from college.

Doc had a rep of not developing Rookies but Jefferson, Allen, West and Rondo all seemed to do well under Doc.

And I will admit to not being good at this. I hated the Bradley trade and thought James Anderson was the way to go. But to my credit I HATED the Jr Giddens trade and thought DeAndre Jordan was the way to go. It is not an exact science.
"Just because you like my stuff doesn't mean I owe you anything." - Bob Dylan

"All this talk about equality. The only thing people really have in common is that they are all going to die." - Bob Dylan
BannersOnly
Starter
Posts: 2,486
And1: 1,676
Joined: May 27, 2010

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#79 » by BannersOnly » Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:22 pm

Stevens hasn't developed a STUD because he has slop to work with. Not his fault. Danny can change that tonight by drafting Dunn or Brown. Hopefully he doesn't eff up again and trade for Okafor or draft some ham and egger.
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,582
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 23, 2001

Re: Who should we take at 3? 

Post#80 » by theman » Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:17 pm

The same person was drafting for Doc who has been drafting for Brad.
"Just because you like my stuff doesn't mean I owe you anything." - Bob Dylan

"All this talk about equality. The only thing people really have in common is that they are all going to die." - Bob Dylan

Return to Boston Celtics