Random Rumor Thread: Post em here

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,074
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#361 » by rpa » Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:58 am

jbk1234 wrote:Show me a first round pick that doesn't have DraftExrpess tape.


There's a difference between a DraftExpress tape and him letting DraftExpress record a private (non-team) workout of his.

This argument is irrelevant though: http://www.nbadraft.net/2011-nba-draft-workout-master-list

Looks like Kawhi worked out with 5 teams

EDIT: Also, to add, Kawhi was a player who was mocked far higher than his draft position (which isn't surprising when you notice that the teams who worked him out had picks 1/4, 5, 6, 7, & 9). If we're making any comparison here to the Kings then panning them for not working out players *below* their position is actually the exact opposite of what happened with Kawhi. In that case the Kings could be panned for not working out any of the top 8 draftees, but as others have mentioned, those players all refuse to workout for the teams at the tail end of the top 10 because they're sure they'll be off the board.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,351
And1: 36,351
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#362 » by jbk1234 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:04 am

rpa wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Show me a first round pick that doesn't have DraftExrpess tape.


There's a difference between a DraftExpress tape and him letting DraftExpress record a private (non-team) workout of his.

This argument is irrelevant though: http://www.nbadraft.net/2011-nba-draft-workout-master-list

Looks like Kawhi worked out with 5 teams

EDIT: Also, to add, Kawhi was a player who was mocked far higher than his draft position (which isn't surprising when you notice that the teams who worked him out had picks 1/4, 5, 6, 7, & 9). If we're making any comparison here to the Kings then panning them for not working out players *below* their position is actually the exact opposite of what happened with Kawhi. In that case the Kings could be panned for not working out any of the top 8 draftees, but as others have mentioned, those players all refuse to workout for the teams at the tail end of the top 10 because they're sure they'll be off the board.


So he worked for no one outside the top 5, fell to 15, and you don't think that matters?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,074
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#363 » by rpa » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:10 am

jbk1234 wrote:So he worked for no one outside the top 5, fell to 15, and you don't think that matters?


Top 10 if you read the edit.

Do I think it matters? Yes, everything matters. Do I think it matters significantly? No. If a team puts that much stock into a 1 hour circle jerk over hundreds of hours of scouting then they deserve to fail.

Point being: the Spurs were able to see a stud without a private workout. 5 teams had a private workout with him and didn't see a stud. You can't intimate that private workouts matter and then cite a situation where the exact opposite is true.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,351
And1: 36,351
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#364 » by jbk1234 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:14 am

rpa wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:So he worked for no one outside the top 5, fell to 15, and you don't think that matters?


Top 10 if you read the edit.

Do I think it matters? Yes, everything matters. Do I think it matters significantly? No. If a team puts that much stock into a 1 hour circle jerk over hundreds of hours of scouting then they deserve to fail.

Point being: the Spurs were able to see a stud without a private workout. 5 teams had a private workout with him and didn't see a stud. You can't intimate that private workouts matter and then cite a situation where the exact opposite is true.


So his agent cuts off work outs, he falls to 15, the Spurs trade up to get him, and the fact that he didn't work out for those other teams who could have drafted him doesn't matter? I'm trying to follow the logic train here. People are making fun of the Kings for trying to work out as many people as they can including people that aren't projected to go in the top 10.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,074
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#365 » by rpa » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:23 am

jbk1234 wrote:So his agent cuts off work outs, he falls to 15, the Spurs trade up to get him, and the fact that he didn't work out for those other teams who could have drafted him doesn't matter? I'm trying to follow the logic train here. People are making fun of the Kings for trying to work out as many people as they can including people that aren't projected to go in the top 10.


a) We don't know if his agent cut off the workouts or teams didn't want to work him out.
b) They're making fun of the Kings for *NOT* working out any players in the top 30 (well, 2 apparently: Baldwin and Brown)

Also on that nbadraft.net workout list (http://www.nbadraft.net/2011-nba-draft-workout-master-list) it has Jimmy Butler working out for 11 teams who held picks 1/4/32, 21, 9/19, 28/30, 25, 31, 7, 27, 22, 15, and 23. 10 of those teams passed on him at least once (including the team that ended up taking him).

Again, my point is that private workouts mean absolutely nothing and I think this proof reflects that to a T.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,351
And1: 36,351
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#366 » by jbk1234 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:26 am

rpa wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:So his agent cuts off work outs, he falls to 15, the Spurs trade up to get him, and the fact that he didn't work out for those other teams who could have drafted him doesn't matter? I'm trying to follow the logic train here. People are making fun of the Kings for trying to work out as many people as they can including people that aren't projected to go in the top 10.


a) We don't know if his agent cut off the workouts or teams didn't want to work him out.
b) They're making fun of the Kings for *NOT* working out any players in the top 30 (well, 2 apparently: Baldwin and Brown)

Also on that nbadraft.net workout list (http://www.nbadraft.net/2011-nba-draft-workout-master-list) it has Jimmy Butler working out for 11 teams who held picks 1/4/32, 21, 9/19, 28/30, 25, 31, 7, 27, 22, 15, and 23. 10 of those teams passed on him at least once (including the team that ended up taking him).

Again, my point is that private workouts mean absolutely nothing and I think this proof reflects that to a T.


Given the choice between "reaching" on a player that don't work out or "reaching" on a play that you do work out, who do you take? I'm not talking about a guy who fell from top 10 to 15 and you trade up to get. That's not ingenuous, that's taking advantage of dumb teams. The Kings are at least trying at 8, not to be a dumb team.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jon1798
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,737
And1: 2,633
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#367 » by Jon1798 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:11 am

Can we again move on from this conversation? I don't think the Kawhi back and forth needs to be in the rumor thread.
"This post wants out of New Orleans" - Woj
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#368 » by freshie2 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:03 pm

pelifan wrote:
freshie2 wrote:Any legs on okafor for #3 rumors with Sixers then maxing Beal? I can't see Washington letting him walk, but like the concept for Philly.


Dunn
Beal
Saric
Simmons
Noel

would be an exciting group. Top 5 league pass team for me.


Swap out Noel for Embiid (although they'll probably get the same amount of playing time) and that lineup is even more intriguing.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,179
And1: 15,042
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#369 » by 165bows » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:06 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
SideSwipe wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
The league should hire two sets of doctors to do physicals and the results should be sent to all 30 teams.


Docs in Phoenix are considered part of the team and a competitive advantage. They see things other docs don't sometimes.


But you undermine the purpose of the draft when some players refuse to even take a physical.

I agree with you here. If teams have their own docs that they feel are better, then they can get their own look too if they think it helps them.
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#370 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:57 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/745962559635861504[/tweet]

Look at the Nets acquiring a pick higher than #24 (the pick Hinkie got from the Thad deal 2 years ago) :D
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#371 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:07 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/745966263525122050[/tweet]

If true, this is very interesting.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: AW: Re: Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#372 » by Pillendreher » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:08 pm

kriss73 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/745962559635861504[/tweet]

Look at the Nets acquiring a pick higher than #24 (the pick Hinkie got from the Thad deal 2 years ago) :D


Watch Presti trade for Lamb (again) and let Waiters walk just to get a pick.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,416
And1: 10,462
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#373 » by the_process » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:19 pm

kriss73 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/745962559635861504[/tweet]

Look at the Nets acquiring a pick higher than #24 (the pick Hinkie got from the Thad deal 2 years ago) :D


When you play next to Brook Lopez and get a whole bunch of rebounds you wouldn't normally, VOI LA! Value goes up. Wonder what pick they will get.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,769
And1: 99,314
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#374 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:21 pm

kriss73 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/745966263525122050[/tweet]

If true, this is very interesting.


If their issue is character-related---they are worried about the deception, then okay. But if you think he is draftable at 19, he's draftable at 22.

Oh and Jake Fisher is one of those zeroes.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: AW: Re: Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#375 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:21 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Watch Presti trade for Lamb (again) and let Waiters walk just to get a pick.


[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/745963574426734592[/tweet]

So, Lamb and #22 for Waiters (plus a future second maybe)?
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#376 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:23 pm

oyoyer wrote:When you play next to Brook Lopez and get a whole bunch of rebounds you wouldn't normally, VOI LA! Value goes up. Wonder what pick they will get.


My bet is as high as #16 Boston
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#377 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:28 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
kriss73 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/JakeLFischer/status/745966263525122050[/tweet]

If true, this is very interesting.


If their issue is character-related---they are worried about the deception, then okay. But if you think he is draftable at 19, he's draftable at 22.

Oh and Jake Fisher is one of those zeroes.


Ok, but I can see a raw player draftable in the bottom of the first round if he's at age 19, but if he's at age 23, the second round is more suitable, isn't it?

The keyword is "raw" imho.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: AW: Re: Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#378 » by Masterfully » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:29 pm

kriss73 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Watch Presti trade for Lamb (again) and let Waiters walk just to get a pick.


[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojVerticalNBA/status/745963574426734592[/tweet]

So, Lamb and #22 for Waiters (plus a future second maybe)?

I trust Woj but but Charlotte has tons of cap space. How many top teir free agents are they expecting to get?
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#379 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:30 pm

kriss73 wrote:
oyoyer wrote:When you play next to Brook Lopez and get a whole bunch of rebounds you wouldn't normally, VOI LA! Value goes up. Wonder what pick they will get.


My bet is as high as #16 Boston


Thad's a poor fit on Boston. I always send Thad to Memphis, so 17 works.
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Random Rumor Thread: Post em here 

Post#380 » by kriss73 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:35 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
kriss73 wrote:
oyoyer wrote:When you play next to Brook Lopez and get a whole bunch of rebounds you wouldn't normally, VOI LA! Value goes up. Wonder what pick they will get.


My bet is as high as #16 Boston


Thad's a poor fit on Boston. I always send Thad to Memphis, so 17 works.


Even better but I thought that Mamphis was committed to Malachi.
However, that's the range imho.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."

Return to Trades and Transactions