ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXX

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1961 » by gtn130 » Wed Jun 22, 2016 8:53 pm

EG > Phil Jackson
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1962 » by BigA » Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:41 pm

gtn130 wrote:EG > Phil Jackson

So he's got that going for him. Which is nice.

A cautionary example illustrating that great coaching doesn't necessarily translate to great GMing. Unless Phil can Zen-up Rose to a semblance of what he was earlier in his career.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1963 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:55 am

Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Mirotic is actually a good small-ball PF. I think he had to play some 3 last season, because Chi had so many bigs. He's a good 3 point shooter, plays hard, rebounds reasonably well - doesn't look pretty, but gets the job done.

I'm doubtful that Porter will be significantly better than Mirotic. We might be able to get Denzell Valentine with the 14th pick - a real solid player who nails 3's and facially looks even more like Temple than Porter does. Only problem with getting both Mirotic and Valentine - neither has good defensive ability.

Wow -- for my $$ Porter is already better than Mirotic! Keeping in mind that this is a 3 vs. a 4, I'm not sure it's even all that close.

Mirotic did shoot the 3 ball well this year (previous year he shot under 31%). But shot 43% on 2-pointers, he is a poor rebounder (not reasonably good), and so far he does nothing else particularly well either.

I'm kind of amazed that people are still underestimating Porter this way.

This is kinda silly. Every time I dare say that I don't think Porter will be a superstar, you pitch a fit. I said, "I'm doubtful that Porter will be SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER than Mirotic." It seems like I have to explain that it means I do think he will be better than Mirotic. I'm not knocking Porter in any way by saying that. Right now, they're about the same. It's not like Mirotic is some old relic; he's just 2 years older than Otto. He is NOT a poor rebounder. You have to consider he played a lot of 3 last season. That's why his rebounding average per 40 minutes decreased from 9.6 to 8.7. He was playing with outstanding rebounders at the 4 and 5 positions, so obviously that cut into the number of rebounds he got. Porter played some 4 last season on a lousy rebounding team and still had only 6.9 per 40. And your attempt to knock Mirotic's scoring efficiency makes no sense because he had the same 56% TS% that Porter had. And as far as overall production, Mirotic had a PER of 15.7 to Otto's 14.4. Again, I'm not knocking Porter by saying he likely won't be SIGNIFICANTLY better than Mirotic. I'm not surprised at your reaction, because you actually said you'd rather have Porter than George shortly before the playoffs. And if you say you still hold that view - after watching the playoffs - I will put you on ignore.

You're going to put me on ignore, Ruz?? I offended you to that degree? Huh. Haven't I also agreed with you about many many opinions and analyses you've posted?

You're right -- Mirotic's rebounding dropped last season; perhaps it will pick up again. I probably shouldn't have made a definitive statement about him as a rebounder. My bad. Then again... his 3-point % that previous season?

I don't dislike Mirotic; I just think Porter is an outstanding young player; he's only 5 months older than Denzel Valentine. And I do think he's significantly better than Mirotic.

Peace, Ruz. Peace.
Traveyknicks23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 1,775
Joined: Feb 23, 2015
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1964 » by Traveyknicks23 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:45 am

stevemcqueen1 wrote:I love that trade for the Bulls, hate it for the Knicks.



No lose situation for the Knicks lol
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,359
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1965 » by verbal8 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:05 am

Traveyknicks23 wrote:
stevemcqueen1 wrote:I love that trade for the Bulls, hate it for the Knicks.



No lose situation for the Knicks lol


How do you figure that?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1966 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:09 pm

payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:Wow -- for my $$ Porter is already better than Mirotic! Keeping in mind that this is a 3 vs. a 4, I'm not sure it's even all that close.

Mirotic did shoot the 3 ball well this year (previous year he shot under 31%). But shot 43% on 2-pointers, he is a poor rebounder (not reasonably good), and so far he does nothing else particularly well either.

I'm kind of amazed that people are still underestimating Porter this way.

This is kinda silly. Every time I dare say that I don't think Porter will be a superstar, you pitch a fit. I said, "I'm doubtful that Porter will be SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER than Mirotic." It seems like I have to explain that it means I do think he will be better than Mirotic. I'm not knocking Porter in any way by saying that. Right now, they're about the same. It's not like Mirotic is some old relic; he's just 2 years older than Otto. He is NOT a poor rebounder. You have to consider he played a lot of 3 last season. That's why his rebounding average per 40 minutes decreased from 9.6 to 8.7. He was playing with outstanding rebounders at the 4 and 5 positions, so obviously that cut into the number of rebounds he got. Porter played some 4 last season on a lousy rebounding team and still had only 6.9 per 40. And your attempt to knock Mirotic's scoring efficiency makes no sense because he had the same 56% TS% that Porter had. And as far as overall production, Mirotic had a PER of 15.7 to Otto's 14.4. Again, I'm not knocking Porter by saying he likely won't be SIGNIFICANTLY better than Mirotic. I'm not surprised at your reaction, because you actually said you'd rather have Porter than George shortly before the playoffs. And if you say you still hold that view - after watching the playoffs - I will put you on ignore.

You're going to put me on ignore, Ruz?? I offended you to that degree? Huh. Haven't I also agreed with you about many many opinions and analyses you've posted?

You're right -- Mirotic's rebounding dropped last season; perhaps it will pick up again. I probably shouldn't have made a definitive statement about him as a rebounder. My bad. Then again... his 3-point % that previous season?

I don't dislike Mirotic; I just think Porter is an outstanding young player; he's only 5 months older than Denzel Valentine. And I do think he's significantly better than Mirotic.

Peace, Ruz. Peace.

You're safe as long as you don't call Otto better than George. I enjoy reading most of your views, but that would push me over the edge. :)
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
stevemcqueen1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,588
And1: 1,137
Joined: Jan 25, 2013
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1967 » by stevemcqueen1 » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:32 pm

Over time I have come to appreciate PIF as an iconoclast. I think it is good for the balance of a discussion to have someone give a voice to those positions, and since I almost always have a very orthodox view of the league and the game, I appreciate that someone else lends that perspective to the conversation.
just1bullet
Sophomore
Posts: 136
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 26, 2001
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1968 » by just1bullet » Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:47 pm

Time to blow it all up
Wall to Lakers for Russel Randle and the 2nd pick(Ingram)
Beal sign and trade Gortat with Celts for #3(Jaylen Brown) #16(Wade Baldwin) #31(Stone) and Smart + filler
Morris to Detroit for Stanley Johnson or #18(Brice Johnson)

Smart/Tomas Satoransky/wade Baldwin
Russel/Oubre JR
Brown/Porter/Johnson
Randle/Ingram
Stone
offer Drummond $25mil a year see if Detroit match if not sign 2 big vets
:crazy: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :nonono: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1969 » by truwizfan4evr » Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:34 pm

That would be some horrible deals for us lol
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1970 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:13 pm

just1bullet wrote:Time to blow it all up
Wall to Lakers for Russel Randle and the 2nd pick(Ingram)
Beal sign and trade Gortat with Celts for #3(Jaylen Brown) #16(Wade Baldwin) #31(Stone) and Smart + filler
Morris to Detroit for Stanley Johnson or #18(Brice Johnson)

Smart/Tomas Satoransky/wade Baldwin
Russel/Oubre JR
Brown/Porter/Johnson
Randle/Ingram
Stone
offer Drummond $25mil a year see if Detroit match if not sign 2 big vets
:crazy: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :nonono: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:

A little off the wall, but I like the thinking outside the box there. Detroit would match.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
just1bullet
Sophomore
Posts: 136
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 26, 2001
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1971 » by just1bullet » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:13 pm

Reality we are no where close to competing for anything, this core has been together for 3 years and they have gotten worse...time to move on and try again...instead of waiting and rebuilding year by year just knock it out today and see what happens for this year
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1972 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:21 pm

just1bullet wrote:Reality we are no where close to competing for anything, this core has been together for 3 years and they have gotten worse...time to move on and try again...instead of waiting and rebuilding year by year just knock it out today and see what happens for this year

It won't happen, but I can't say I disagree with you. You're likely ahead of the curve.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1973 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:41 pm

Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:...I'm not knocking Porter ...I'm not surprised at your reaction, because you actually said you'd rather have Porter than George shortly before the playoffs. And if you say you still hold that view...I will put you on ignore.

You're going to put me on ignore, Ruz?? I offended you to that degree? Huh. Haven't I also agreed with you about many many opinions and analyses you've posted? ....

You're safe as long as you don't call Otto better than George. I enjoy reading most of your views, but that would push me over the edge. :)

Otto & George -- a couple of goofy names that ought to be on Sesame Street.

If it'll keep you from putting me on ignore I'll say that Paul George is better than Paul Pierce and George Mikan combined. (note that I'm counting on absolutely nobody -- and especially not gtn -- recognizing the 2d name)

As far as "my views" -- sometimes I annoy myself, to tell the truth. I could use to let well enough alone more often, don't you think? Then again, it's my experience that a person's strengths and weaknesses are usually the same: it's context that makes them positive or negative.

Probably too late for me to change -- some day a person walking past my grave will say to his companion "I'm sure I heard someone arguing in there. Did you hear it?"
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1974 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:44 pm

stevemcqueen1 wrote:Over time I have come to appreciate PIF as an iconoclast. I think it is good for the balance of a discussion to have someone give a voice to those positions, and since I almost always have a very orthodox view of the league and the game, I appreciate that someone else lends that perspective to the conversation.

Holy moly. I'm blushing, stevie -- thanks.

William Blake once wrote: "Opposition is true friendship."
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1975 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:48 pm

payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:You're going to put me on ignore, Ruz?? I offended you to that degree? Huh. Haven't I also agreed with you about many many opinions and analyses you've posted? ....

You're safe as long as you don't call Otto better than George. I enjoy reading most of your views, but that would push me over the edge. :)

Otto & George -- a couple of goofy names that ought to be on Sesame Street.

If it'll keep you from putting me on ignore I'll say that Paul George is better than Paul Pierce and George Mikan combined. (note that I'm counting on absolutely nobody -- and especially not gtn -- recognizing the 2d name)

As far as "my views" -- sometimes I annoy myself, to tell the truth. I could use to let well enough alone more often, don't you think? Then again, it's my experience that a person's strengths and weaknesses are usually the same: it's context that makes them positive or negative.

Probably too late for me to change -- some day a person walking past my grave will say to his companion "I'm sure I heard someone arguing in there. Did you hear it?"

Mikan now or in his prime? :wink:

And I will not post a video of Billy Joel singing "just the way you are".
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1976 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:54 pm

just1bullet wrote:Time to blow it all up
Wall to Lakers for Russel Randle and the 2nd pick(Ingram)
Beal sign and trade Gortat with Celts for #3(Jaylen Brown) #16(Wade Baldwin) #31(Stone) and Smart + filler
Morris to Detroit for Stanley Johnson or #18(Brice Johnson)

Smart/Tomas Satoransky/wade Baldwin
Russel/Oubre JR
Brown/Porter/Johnson
Randle/Ingram
Stone
offer Drummond $25mil a year see if Detroit match if not sign 2 big vets
:crazy: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :noway: :crazy: :noway: :nonono: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod:

6 rookies (or maybe 5 depending on which "Johnson"). You are my kind of guy.

Sign me up for those deals, except none of them seem very possible to me:

No way would the Lakers give us Russell, Randle & the #2 for John Wall.
You want to sign 'n trade Beal, and then include Gortat as well, for those 3 picks plus Smart & filler? Why not separate deals for Beal and Gortat? I don't think Boston would do that combo deal.
Detroit isn't going to trade Stanley Johnson or the #18 for Morris. They could have made either of those trades at the deadline this year, but they didn't.
Detroit ain't letting Drummond go.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1977 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:04 pm

Ruzious wrote:
just1bullet wrote:Reality we are no where close to competing for anything, this core has been together for 3 years and they have gotten worse...time to move on and try again...instead of waiting and rebuilding year by year just knock it out today and see what happens for this year

It won't happen, but I can't say I disagree with you. You're likely ahead of the curve.

Agreed. And I've been preaching this sermon myself for quite some time.

The problem is that Ernie has so screwed the pooch that even rebuilding from scratch would be difficult if we started today. Obviously we'd want to keep Porter and Oubre. Morris has next to no trade value. For Gortat we'd likely get a mid-R1 pick and a prospect (not a big-time one) plus maybe a late R2 pick. Who knows what Beal's trade value is?

That leaves Wall as (obviously) our biggest trade asset. Your previous post indicates that you are kinda optimistic about what he'd bring back.

Add to that our no picks this year and, I believe, our R2 pick next year also belonging to another team, and rebuilding looks like a long long slog to me. That's what a bad GM with a lot of job security does to you.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1978 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:07 pm

Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:You're safe as long as you don't call Otto better than George. I enjoy reading most of your views, but that would push me over the edge. :)

Otto & George -- a couple of goofy names that ought to be on Sesame Street.

If it'll keep you from putting me on ignore I'll say that Paul George is better than Paul Pierce and George Mikan combined. (note that I'm counting on absolutely nobody -- and especially not gtn -- recognizing the 2d name)

As far as "my views" -- sometimes I annoy myself, to tell the truth. I could use to let well enough alone more often, don't you think? Then again, it's my experience that a person's strengths and weaknesses are usually the same: it's context that makes them positive or negative.

Probably too late for me to change -- some day a person walking past my grave will say to his companion "I'm sure I heard someone arguing in there. Did you hear it?"

Mikan now or in his prime? :wink:

And I will not post a video of Billy Joel singing "just the way you are".

I shoulda known better than to think you wouldn't know who Mikan was. I wonder what that last name was shortened from? He might have been Generation 1 of the Polish Hammer !! :)
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1979 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:13 pm

payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
just1bullet wrote:Reality we are no where close to competing for anything, this core has been together for 3 years and they have gotten worse...time to move on and try again...instead of waiting and rebuilding year by year just knock it out today and see what happens for this year

It won't happen, but I can't say I disagree with you. You're likely ahead of the curve.

Agreed. And I've been preaching this sermon myself for quite some time.

The problem is that Ernie has so screwed the pooch that even rebuilding from scratch would be difficult if we started today. Obviously we'd want to keep Porter and Oubre. Morris has next to no trade value. For Gortat we'd likely get a mid-R1 pick and a prospect (not a big-time one) plus maybe a late R2 pick. Who knows what Beal's trade value is?

That leaves Wall as (obviously) our biggest trade asset. Your previous post indicates that you are kinda optimistic about what he'd bring back.

Add to that our no picks this year and, I believe, our R2 pick next year also belonging to another team, and rebuilding looks like a long long slog to me. That's what a bad GM with a lot of job security does to you.

I think what's most likely to happen is that Wiz management is going to be content with a goal of trying to make the last playoffs spot every year that we have Wall under contract. Once Wall leaves, they'll finally be forced to rebuild, and it will be ugly. It might be up to the fans to revolt and boycott, but I think there are enough fans that will accept their goal of shooting for mediocrity.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 9,510
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1980 » by payitforward » Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:15 pm

Ernie has said this a zillion times: "our goal this like every year is to contend for a playoff spot." Reach for the stars, Ernie.

Return to Washington Wizards