Powder Blue wrote:skywalker33 wrote:Powder Blue wrote:
I've heard Bender is a decent shooter....but he's not guard. We need shooting at the G/F spot more so than the F/C spot. Insert all the "Harris is a a great shooter/defender" talk here but I stand by my notion his ceiling is not a top 10-15 SG in this league and his ceiling is lower than Hield and Murray's.
Why does our next shooter have to be a guard ?? Imagine Gallo and Bender at the 3pt line and the elbow, that would open up the middle for Mudiay, Jokic and Harris. It could put us at a disadvantage for rebounding but that could work because the opposing teams bigs will be on the perimeter too.
Love you all on here but I think you're a bit blinded by "potential". Mudiay has some slash in him but Harris and Jokic def don't. I don't think we're all that weak at the 4 if they decided to play Juk and Nurk together. Also the FA market is much better at the 4 spot than the 2....plus we have this guy named Kenneth Faried on the roster. Last I checked he's a much better PF than Harris is a SG. SG is by far the weakest position on our team.
Hey, I'm not stuck on Bender as much as I am on BPA. My personal order is 1.Murray 2. Bender 3. Hield 4. Best player left
As for Faried vs Harris, I'll agree...for now. I love what Faried does but he is so limiting as a PF, Harris has more overall quality but needs to continuing to develop, not sure you'll be able to make that same comparison by the end of the year. There's a lot more PF's I'd take over Faried than there are SG's I'd take over Harris. And I disagree about Harris slash ability, he's one of the best off-the-ball guys we have and that leads to drives to the basket.
I waffle on the SG being our worst position on the team, but that is where I'd like to build up via the draft. Barton had to play SF a lot due to injuries and I see him more in the SG role this year than last, especially with a healthy Chandler (who can also play a little SG).