Risk101 wrote:Lol why does Wade care who we pick![]()
[tweet]https://twitter.com/johnschuhmann/status/746343992757993472[/tweet]
I appreciate the programming humor.
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Risk101 wrote:Lol why does Wade care who we pick![]()
[tweet]https://twitter.com/johnschuhmann/status/746343992757993472[/tweet]

Throwback24 wrote:NBA48mins wrote:If anyone has been paying attention, we have drafted the 2 highest PER players in the draft. We also did it with Delon Wright as well.
lol what has Delon shown or done in the league besides smile at the end of the bench?
SHFT wrote:Throwback24 wrote:NBA48mins wrote:If anyone has been paying attention, we have drafted the 2 highest PER players in the draft. We also did it with Delon Wright as well.
lol what has Delon shown or done in the league besides smile at the end of the bench?
In all fairness he is playing behind our best player and hometown kid.....the few mins Delon played I was impressed
Brinbe wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS0CRc0bYpw[/youtube]
Throwback24 wrote:SHFT wrote:Throwback24 wrote:
lol what has Delon shown or done in the league besides smile at the end of the bench?
In all fairness he is playing behind our best player and hometown kid.....the few mins Delon played I was impressed
So was I, I'm just saying its a bad example
Throwback24 wrote:lol what has Delon shown or done in the league besides smile at the end of the bench?
Thespianoid wrote:GTFO with this reasonable talk. RealGM doesn't do that.

SaveTheHens wrote:I still don't get it, especially after seeing the wiretap again saying we're interested in skal at 9. If we were interested at 9, why wouldn't we take him at 27? Smokescreen???

arbsn wrote:Wizdome wrote:What's everyone's fascination with Skal. I was never really impressed with him when I say him play. The guy averaged 6 points and 3 rebounds on a per of 18.
He had a disappointing freshman season - happens to a lot of guys. The undeniable fact was that he was ranked #2 on the ESPN top 100 which gives him about a 90% chance of becoming an NBA all-star.
That, along with his size, shooting potential, and defensive potential make him a solid prospect. At 27 he would have been a solid pick. Tough to judge though maybe Siakam is the real deal never really heard of him
CrookedJ wrote:SaveTheHens wrote:I still don't get it, especially after seeing the wiretap again saying we're interested in skal at 9. If we were interested at 9, why wouldn't we take him at 27? Smokescreen???
It was pure Chad Ford apparently. I suspect this its simply a follow up rumor to the earlier rumor that Raps were talking to Calipari doing due dillgence on a UK player. Keeping in mind that even if that rumor was true it could have also been , Murray, Ullis or Poythress ( who we had just worked out). Or it could have been about Skal and the info that they got didn't allay concerns etc.
djsunyc wrote:Lateral Quicks wrote:After having a bit of time to digest, I think I actually like this pick more than the Poetl pick at #9. I expect Poetl to be trade fodder in a year or two.
watch this vid:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLJ3F5Aazv0[/youtube]
he reminds me alot of a 7'1 david lee that can play defense. and he looks like he could play pf.


Lateral Quicks wrote:djsunyc wrote:Lateral Quicks wrote:After having a bit of time to digest, I think I actually like this pick more than the Poetl pick at #9. I expect Poetl to be trade fodder in a year or two.
watch this vid:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLJ3F5Aazv0[/youtube]
he reminds me alot of a 7'1 david lee that can play defense. and he looks like he could play pf.
Well, I hope to be wrong.
Class Act wrote:sule wrote:Patman wrote:Siakam has some Amir Johnson to him. Both were skinny coming into the league, but never shied away from contact. Both guys get after it on the defensive end and on the glass. Both guys have ugly-looking offensive games, but somehow make it work with a soft touch around the rim (hard to find). Jumper a work in progress but shows promise.
I don't see the Bismack comparison. I think it's a bit racist TBH b/c of their African roots, but anyhow. Siakam has much softer hands and can shoot FT's. Bismack is a more explosive athlete and finishes stronger. Siakam is mobile/fluid, but does not have the athleticism of a Biz/DAJ/Drummond/Whiteside.
Ehh...not really racist when you just look at the kind of energy and stamina in his play. He looks like he can be continuously on the move, which could bode well for his rebounding. But Siakam seems like he can be a better passer and scorer. Bismack will be a better rebounder than Siakam, just based off wingspan alone (like 4 inches difference).
75% the D of Bismack with better scoring and probably a bit less rebounding would be how i'd like the Raps to take his development, since that's the kind of player that could thrive on this team, and seems like the kind of potential that can be developed in him.
It's not racist because Africa is not a race.

SaveTheHens wrote:I still don't get it, especially after seeing the wiretap again saying we're interested in skal at 9. If we were interested at 9, why wouldn't we take him at 27? Smokescreen???
