ImageImageImageImageImage

Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris?

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years iof Markieff Morris

Hill
8
33%
Morris
16
67%
 
Total votes: 24

User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#61 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:17 pm

gtn130 wrote:tontoz just got straight rekt. feel bad for him tbh



What is Steve Mills job title with the Knicks?

While you are at it please explain how they "easily" could have kept Harden.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#62 » by gtn130 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:24 pm

tontoz wrote:What is Steve Mills job title with the Knicks?


A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion.

Image

There is no reason to engage with you when you're arguing in bad faith. RIP tontoz
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#63 » by gtn130 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:28 pm

Me: Phil Jackson has been a terrible GM for the Knicks.

Tontoz: No he hasn't. Wanna know why? He's not technically the GM!!!!!

Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#64 » by montestewart » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:28 pm

In the movies, when things go south, everyone turns on each other. You know it's true. Soylent Green is people!
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#65 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:31 pm

gtn130 wrote:
tontoz wrote:What is Steve Mills job title with the Knicks?


A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion.

Image

There is no reason to engage with you when you're arguing in bad faith. RIP tontoz



Bad faith :lol:

Like saying OKC traded Harden for nothing? Like pretending they could have "easily" have kept Harden if they traded Perkins, who by your own admission sucked from day 1.And even if they did trade Perkins they would have to trade him to a team well below the cap so they wouldnt have to take back equal salary, yet another fact you ignore.

Jackson can fire the GM and hire another if he chooses. He is above the GM and he has only had the position two years, hardly enough time to make an "infinite" number of bad moves.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#66 » by gtn130 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:32 pm

tontoz wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
tontoz wrote:What is Steve Mills job title with the Knicks?


A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion.

Image

There is no reason to engage with you when you're arguing in bad faith. RIP tontoz



Bad faith :lol:

Like saying OKC traded Harden for nothing? Like pretending they could have "easily" have kept Harden if they traded Perkins, who by your own admission sucked from day 1.And even if they did trade Perkins they would have to trade him to a team well below the cap so they wouldnt have to take back equal salary, yet another fact you ignore.

Jackson can fire the GM and hire another if he chooses. He is above the GM and he has only had the position two years, hardly enough time to make an "infinite" number of bad moves.


Image
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#67 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:37 pm

gtn130 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
gtn130 wrote:
A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion.

Image

There is no reason to engage with you when you're arguing in bad faith. RIP tontoz



Bad faith :lol:

Like saying OKC traded Harden for nothing? Like pretending they could have "easily" have kept Harden if they traded Perkins, who by your own admission sucked from day 1.And even if they did trade Perkins they would have to trade him to a team well below the cap so they wouldnt have to take back equal salary, yet another fact you ignore.

Jackson can fire the GM and hire another if he chooses. He is above the GM and he has only had the position two years, hardly enough time to make an "infinite" number of bad moves.


Image



I understand. Your command of English and of the facts is so bad that you have been reduced to posting pictures so your ignorance won't get any more exposed.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,424
And1: 8,648
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#68 » by AFM » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:39 pm

Can you two shut the phukk up?
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#69 » by gtn130 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:42 pm

tontoz wrote:I understand. Your command of English and of the facts is so bad that you have been reduced to posting pictures so your ignorance won't get any more exposed.


Lots of wanting here.

We've already established that there's simply no reason to continue engaing with you when you're going to make nitty bad faith arguments about Phil Jackson's technical title with the Knicks that completely derail the conversation. Sorry if that makes you feel bad.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#70 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:46 pm

gtn130 wrote:
tontoz wrote:I understand. Your command of English and of the facts is so bad that you have been reduced to posting pictures so your ignorance won't get any more exposed.


Lots of wanting here.

We've already established that there's simply no reason to continue engaing with you when you're going to make nitty bad faith arguments about Phil Jackson's technical title with the Knicks that completely derail the conversation. Sorry if that makes you feel bad.


Sorry that are too dumb to understand the salary cap and have to pretend that OKC traded Harden for nothing because you don't remember the trade.

Jackson's job title, like the Harden trade, are common knowledge to people who actually know the NBA. You aren't one of them.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#71 » by gtn130 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:48 pm

tontoz is so mad lol
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,253
And1: 5,029
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#72 » by tontoz » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:50 pm

gtn130 wrote:tontoz is so mad lol



Arguing with a child who can't remember what happened just a few years ago is a bit annoying.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#73 » by montestewart » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:57 pm

Image
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#74 » by fishercob » Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:40 pm

AFM wrote:Can you two shut the phukk up?


Or just give into their true feelings and make love already!
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,424
And1: 8,648
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#75 » by AFM » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:03 pm

fishercob wrote:
AFM wrote:Can you two shut the phukk up?


Or just give into their true feelings and make love already!


That's you and me daddy! They call me the prostate kid!
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Would you rather have a year of George Hill or three years of Markieff Morris? 

Post#76 » by fishercob » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:21 pm

AFM wrote:
fishercob wrote:
AFM wrote:Can you two shut the phukk up?


Or just give into their true feelings and make love already!


That's you and me daddy! They call me the prostate kid!


I don't want to make monte jealous.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin

Return to Washington Wizards