ImageImageImageImage

Whiteside + Ibaka?

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

fateis007
Rookie
Posts: 1,212
And1: 991
Joined: Dec 15, 2013

Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#1 » by fateis007 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 12:30 pm

So I know this has already been hammered home, and the chances of us landing whiteside are slim. But let's just say we offer the guy a huge max offer and he considers it, and we land another big free agent or trade to entice him.

Imagine having AG, Whiteside, Ibaka in the starting lineup. I am not sure how it would work on offense, but that front court with frank vogel at the helm, could be the best defensive team in the NBA easily for years to come. I mean, you have 2 guys that can average 3-4blocks a game, and AG who can guard 1-4 positions.
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,918
And1: 14,847
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#2 » by tiderulz » Sun Jun 26, 2016 2:29 pm

the thing i can imagine is how bad that offense would be.
AddiFB
Veteran
Posts: 2,993
And1: 2,714
Joined: Jul 31, 2009
Location: Iceland
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#3 » by AddiFB » Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:12 pm

tiderulz wrote:the thing i can imagine is how bad that offense would be.


Screw that. Winning a game 65-55 is just s fun as winning it 110-90 :lol:
- Orlando Magic fan since 1991 -
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,918
And1: 14,847
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#4 » by tiderulz » Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:14 pm

AddiFB wrote:
tiderulz wrote:the thing i can imagine is how bad that offense would be.


Screw that. Winning a game 65-55 is just s fun as winning it 110-90 :lol:


im a Bama fan who grew up learning to appreciate a 10-7 winning game.

But you are not going to hold teams that far under their scoring average, it just wont happen. You have to be able to score yourself and that front line will be the lowest scoring front line in the NBA (outside of whatever d-leaguers Philly throws out)
ralphie9898
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 390
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#5 » by ralphie9898 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:26 pm

tiderulz wrote:the thing i can imagine is how bad that offense would be.

Yeah I don't know about that. Ibaka has a very under-rated offensive game and is a good shooter with range. Whiteside can score even though he isn't a great shooter and Gordon is making strides as a shooter but is an amazing athlete who should only get better. If Hezonja can be the guy we hope him to be he can help to provide the spacing needed for Gordon to be even more effective. And if we can get Conley he can help space the floor and provide good scoring. We may not have a go-to scorer but I think we could still have a good enough offense to compete.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 49,000
And1: 12,481
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#6 » by BadMofoPimp » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:25 pm

I don't even think Rob is even thinking of talking to Whitesides agent. They have plenty of other teams that will.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
PennytoShaq
Magic Forum Mock Draft Co-Champ
Posts: 7,381
And1: 5,218
Joined: Jan 24, 2016
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#7 » by PennytoShaq » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:29 pm

Yeah the whole reason you get Ibaka is so you don't have to pander to guys like Whiteside or overpay Biyombo.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#8 » by Skin » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:39 pm

Whiteside is still my #1 FA target. Between those 2 we'd have the best defensive frontcourt in the NBA. ...and they would be absolutely FINE offensively. Ibaka is a great rim protector, but he's not a great post defender.

If we can't get him, then I want us to get Horford.
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,918
And1: 14,847
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#9 » by tiderulz » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:31 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:I don't even think Rob is even thinking of talking to Whitesides agent. They have plenty of other teams that will.


you could stop right there. You have no idea what Rob is doing, who he is talking to
MagicFan101
RealGM
Posts: 11,248
And1: 6,572
Joined: Jul 04, 2012
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#10 » by MagicFan101 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:37 pm

Mahinmi and DD are the only big men I expect us to show interest in now that we have Ibaka.

I have been excited for an Ibaka + Vuc, Noel + Vuc, Myles Turner + Vuc or some sort of shot blocker + Vuc combo for a years. We finally have that. I (and I suspect Henny) want to actually see how that works. This was not a move to make Vuc expendable. This was a move to find Vuc the perfect wing-man.
User avatar
Max Power
Head Coach
Posts: 6,907
And1: 1,250
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Location: Orlando

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#11 » by Max Power » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:43 pm

Gotta agree, Hennigan tends to play close to the chest. We have no real idea who and what moves the Magic are looking at, especially now with the Ibaka trade. We could be looking at Whiteside, although I think that's not the best move if this team pays any attention of offense. If Evan Fournier is our best offensive player this team isn't going anywhere.

Gordon is an up and comer, but I don't see him as a 24 ppg guy ever. Payton isn't even worth discussing as an offensive option. Vucevic and Ibaka should be a fantastic, balanced front court. If anything I think the Magic may look at Conley.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
You look confused...let me fill you in.
OrlandoDream
General Manager
Posts: 8,021
And1: 6,242
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs Fl
 

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#12 » by OrlandoDream » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:43 pm

We have no shot at him. More realistic target is Horford. trading for Ibaka I think ended that. We need to target Conley, resign Evan and add some scoring.
Ohhwell8
Junior
Posts: 486
And1: 180
Joined: Sep 25, 2015
   

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#13 » by Ohhwell8 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:52 pm

Yeah, we'd struggle on offense, which is an issue we will already have unless we see some big steps from some of the guys.

We signed Ibaka to pair with Vuc, if we were going to sign a defense center we would have gotten a better offensive PF.
Mike1989
Sophomore
Posts: 167
And1: 75
Joined: May 19, 2016

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#14 » by Mike1989 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:20 pm

If we paired Ibaka with Whiteside, we would certainly have a duo of proven shot blockers and athletic defenders.

Would Payton, Fournier/Hezonja, Gordon, Ibaka and Whiteside work offensively?

I have my doubts because Payton and Gordon are not particularly impressive outside shooters, and Whiteside doesn't offer much offense outside of the paint and attacking the rim. Now that is not an issue if you have two lights out three point shooters at SG and PF, and if we re-sign Fournier he fits one of those roles, but Ibaka would need to boost his three point percentage from last season's .326 if he is going to be relied on to help spacing on the court. As such, I would be hesitant to trust this line up on the offense end of the court. It would work defensively, but offensively I think we could find it difficult to score at times because teams would simply dare us to shoot and clog the paint. In a sense we would become like the Bucks last season. Defensively tough, but offensively lackluster.

Perhaps I'm being harsh, but I just don't believe any team can afford to have a lackluster shooting line up in today's NBA and hope to compete for and/or win a championship, and without serious shooting improvement from our young players, I think the ceiling of that team would be limited and we would soon be looking at ways to change things up.
EAS Law
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 3,456
Joined: Nov 01, 2015

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#15 » by EAS Law » Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:55 pm

I think Whiteside is fool's gold. He has nights and stretches where he looks great, but i believe that we will look back at him and wonder how he got maxed out.

I agree that Ibaka makes our need for a FA 4/5 exponentially lower.

The unfortunate thing is that we have a lot of wings that we believe in at the moment, but that frankly aren't good enough yet, and that a lot of the promising FA wings are quickly falling off of the market for us.
Magic#1
General Manager
Posts: 7,846
And1: 1,159
Joined: Apr 12, 2001

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#16 » by Magic#1 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:15 pm

We could go after him, but I'm more concerned with his intangibles than his skills. I don't see the offensive concern as Ibaka is basically a stretch four.
chosen12141
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 117
Joined: Jun 25, 2014
         

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#17 » by chosen12141 » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:22 pm

AddiFB wrote:
tiderulz wrote:the thing i can imagine is how bad that offense would be.


Screw that. Winning a game 65-55 is just s fun as winning it 110-90 :lol:



Defense wins rings!!!!! Ex: the 2016 LaBrons!! :nod: :nod:
Waiting for the Championship parade at Lake Eola!
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#18 » by Skin » Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:20 am

Tim MacMahon: Hassan Whiteside: “I really don’t think it’s about loyalty. It’s about the best situation for myself.” http://es.pn/28WS5iU – via Twitter espn_macmahon

Ethan J. Skolnick: Asked if he’ll stay in Miami if all things are equal. Long pause. “We’ll see.”

Ethan J. Skolnick: Hassan Whiteside says no state tax is a factor. “But you can get traded.”

Ethan J. Skolnick: Hassan Whiteside non-committal on which specific factor means the most. Compares it to picking a wife. “Got to have everything.”

---------

GO FOR IT HENNY! Form the best frontcourt in the NBA overnight!!!

PF Serge Ibaka, Aaron Gordon, Andrew Nicholson
C Hassan Whiteside, Nikola Vucevic, Stephen Zimmerman

Image
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,282
And1: 13,734
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#19 » by Bensational » Mon Jun 27, 2016 8:43 am

I don't think Whiteside is a real target, but that defensive combo under Vogel would be intense.

Offensively, they'd be fine. Ibaka can stretch the floor and Payton and Whiteside could run PnRs all night long.
ralphie9898
Analyst
Posts: 3,361
And1: 390
Joined: Jul 02, 2013

Re: Whiteside + Ibaka? 

Post#20 » by ralphie9898 » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:01 am

PennytoShaq wrote:Yeah the whole reason you get Ibaka is so you don't have to pander to guys like Whiteside or overpay Biyombo.

maybe but Ibaka will still be a PF. Which means he will not always be in position to be a rim protector as he will have to chase even more and more mobile 4s who can also shoot out to the three point line. I would still look to see if we can get a defensive upgrade at the 5 spot so I would still go after Whiteside, Biymbo or Mahinmi.

Return to Orlando Magic