NavLDO wrote:bwgood77 wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:
In what way is Marquise Chriss ever going to be an NBA SF? Bender I can somewhat understand, but no freaking way on Chriss. Chriss is a PF through and through. He's closer to a future 5 than a 3. The NBA is trending positionless with guys playing up, not forcing bigs to play the 3.
I'd be okay with Carroll, so long as Tucker is moved. Move Chandler too. Carroll could bring Warren along and Bender and Chriss can man the 4 with some backup 5 minutes to Len.
Yeah, no way to rely on Bender or Chriss to play a ton of minutes at SF, especially Chriss.
Why does everyone think Chriss is less likely to play SF than a dude who is nearly 7' 1" tall, who is not athletic as the 6'10 Chriss?? I know Chriss is not a defensive 'stud' but he has the physical make-up.
Because of this:
saintEscaton wrote:
Bender's lateral agility and ability to manuever in space makes him a better team defenders staying in front of smaller players. Chriss plays with no leverage/ bend and is really upright, he is a poorer man defender. Do you expect him to contain dribble penetration against wings one on one. Offensively he needs to be a better shot creator and less of a blackhole, his handle is good enough for a 4 but he would need to put it on the deck more at the 3





















