ImageImage

Portland - 2016 Offseason

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1721 » by Masterfully » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:25 pm

Andre 2999 wrote:Yeah, but normally restricted free agents don't fetch too much of a return. The fact that they're free agents and the interested team could just sign them outright lowers their value.

Yes, RFAs don't typically yield good return. But they can't just sign him outright. Portland has total control over where Crabbe plays unless he accepts his QO.
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,283
And1: 1,406
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1722 » by cucad8 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:28 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/749323430298787841[/tweet]
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1723 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:30 pm

cucad8 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/749323430298787841[/tweet]


am I the only confused about what "large" means after the last 36 hours?
The Sebastian Express
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,466
And1: 11,847
Joined: Dec 10, 2004

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1724 » by The Sebastian Express » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:30 pm

I think Gaosl is an interesting option. We're a young team. A young team with even younger bigs. I'm not opposed, should he choose us, to paying him to bring that experience and knowledge to young bigs and the team overall, that championship experience and demeanor.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1725 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:34 pm

if the Blazers wanted to keep both Harkless and Crabbe, they could offer a 2 year deal of about 30-32 million or a 3 year deal of 45-48 million. That might be considered large
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,828
And1: 1,585
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1726 » by Blazinaway » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:34 pm

looks like Biyombo got around 4/70
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1727 » by Masterfully » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:34 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
cucad8 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/749323430298787841[/tweet]


am I the only confused about what "large" means after the last 36 hours?

Image
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1728 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:35 pm

Blazinaway wrote:looks like Biyombo got around 4/70


now the question is, who would you rather have at 4/70, Turner or Biyombo?
Run PDX
Pro Prospect
Posts: 967
And1: 452
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
   

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1729 » by Run PDX » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:39 pm

Something tells me Toronto will make an offer to Leonard soon. He was meeting the Raptors earlier...
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,828
And1: 1,585
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1730 » by Blazinaway » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:39 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:looks like Biyombo got around 4/70


now the question is, who would you rather have at 4/70, Turner or Biyombo?


Turner, Biyombo turned FIVE good playoff games into a huge overpay IMO. He's awful on offense and has bad hands.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1731 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:41 pm

Arron Afflalo got a 2-year/25-million deal from the Kings
HoopsFanAZ
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,490
And1: 388
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1732 » by HoopsFanAZ » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:42 pm

Who to have of Biyombo or Turner at 4 and $70 mil.?

Both.
PTPaQ
Pro Prospect
Posts: 758
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 15, 2010

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1733 » by PTPaQ » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:42 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:looks like Biyombo got around 4/70


now the question is, who would you rather have at 4/70, Turner or Biyombo?


Turner. He is going to grow on Rip City once all these "new contract smells" wear off. I love him.

And Gasol was my number 1 big man choice for a win-now move assuming the roster was assembled right. I'm down with all of this right now.
The Sebastian Express
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,466
And1: 11,847
Joined: Dec 10, 2004

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1734 » by The Sebastian Express » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:42 pm

Run PDX wrote:Something tells me Toronto will make an offer to Leonard soon. He was meeting the Raptors earlier...


as Duster pointed out (unless this is new, non-TMZ information), that was quickly debunked. The man in the picture doesn't even look like Meyers.
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1735 » by Masterfully » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:43 pm

Man, I'd pay money to make KD go to Boston. Not a lot of money. But if like $27 of my hard earned money made it happen I would totally do it.

Just to see the league wide fall out.
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,617
And1: 6,612
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1736 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:44 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:from Olshey's POV I think he wants Gasol because of the short term deal he'd be. I think Olshey has every intention of re-signing CJ and he knows that a short-term fix at C makes a lot of sense with the trio of Dame-CJ-Turner probably on schedule to make 70 million a year combined by July 2017...and Plumlee scheduled for hi extension when the cap is 110 million

as far as trajectory, I think Gasol on last year's Blazer team would have upgraded the team significantly, and I like Plumlee. Gasol is as good an assist man as Plumlee; he's a better rebounder, a better defender and a better rim protector. Further, he's actually a threat on offense opponents would have to respect


Better than Plumlee I'll buy but I just don't believe it will be by much. He's 35, limited mobility, strictly a center at this point, his defense is not going to be any better. His offense would be an upgrade, but I'm sticking to my belief he wouldn't have gotten us past a healthy Clippers team, let alone make a difference against GS. He would be fine if we could strictly add him, but when the equation becomes losing rights to younger players that's when I would balk at any short-term solution.

I also think you're making a significant leap of faith that 'young' players signed to contracts this summer will somehow have positive trade value next year or the year after. First of all, they have to perform and they need to have widely applicable skills. Meyers only has one skill, perimeter shooting, and it's inconsistent. Being tall and sloth-like slow isn't a skill; and being a sieve on defense isn't one either

Crabbe may have a skill that would give him some positive value, but that assumption depends on the type of contract he's on. If he ends up being paid 15-18 million/year, there's no positive value there that I can see

it might be worth keeping in mind justhow to justify paying Crabbe a lot of money. Lillard is going to make 28 million/year. Turner 17.5 million a year. In less then a year CJ is very likely to be on a contract paying him 25 million/year, or more

that's over 70 million a year, then add Crabbe to the mix and it could easily be 85 million a year for those 4 players...ouch. There are a whole lot of flaws in the foursome to be paying 85 million a year for


Who knows if they would be positive but, short of an outrageous overpay (ie Crabbe at 18), having players like Aminu/Davis/Crabbe/Harkless/Meyers on deals between 7-14 million gives us options in trade. If Aminu is the player another team wants then we still have Harkless/Crabbe. I'm not saying these players would be the main attraction, but would give the other team options of how they want to match salary. The fewer contracts we have in that range, the fewer options we have to match salary.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,744
And1: 396
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1737 » by Butter » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:46 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:looks like Biyombo got around 4/70


now the question is, who would you rather have at 4/70, Turner or Biyombo?


I actually really like what Turner brings to this team on the court. I do agree that his contract is not a good value though.
Rip City, baby!!!!
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1738 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:47 pm

Masterfully wrote:Man, I'd pay money to make KD go to Boston. Not a lot of money. But if like $27 of my hard earned money made it happen I would totally do it.

Just to see the league wide fall out.


there might be a lesson here though

Portland gave a crazy offer to Kanter and OKC stubbornly matched it. It's looking like that decision has really altered their prospects. Blazers should keep that in mind with their own RFA's
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,351
And1: 8,064
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1739 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:50 pm

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:Who knows if they would be positive but, short of an outrageous overpay (ie Crabbe at 18), having players like Aminu/Davis/Crabbe/Harkless/Meyers on deals between 7-14 million gives us options in trade. If Aminu is the player another team wants then we still have Harkless/Crabbe. I'm not saying these players would be the main attraction, but would give the other team options of how they want to match salary. The fewer contracts we have in that range, the fewer options we have to match salary.


you're overlooking the 'fact' that quite often, the trade value of cap-space/TPE's is much better then that of players, of whatever age, with large deals. Portland doesn't have to bust either the cap or the salary floor to field a team with good trade leverage
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Portland - 2016 Offseason 

Post#1740 » by Jsun947 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:55 pm

Wtf is Orlando doing?

They gave up Oladipo and their 2016 pick for Ibaka. He has to play 36-40 minutes a night.
Then they sign Biyombo for 17.5 mil, I'd think they expect him to play 30 minutes a game.

That leaves about 30 minutes a game total between Aaron Gordon & Vucevic. And even less if they plan on ever playing Jeff Green a single minute at PF

I have to imagine Vucevic or Aaron Gordon gets traded within a week... Vucevic at 11.75, 12.25, and 12.75 is a great contract in this new cap climate.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers