nuposse04 wrote:payitforward wrote:Nope. Not a good signing in the least. Does nothing particularly well and managed to earn 800 minutes on a team that wasn't as good as ours last year. Turns 27 later this year, so forget about him having future development potential in him. Quincy Acy would have been a lot better -- much more effective, younger, probably will go cheaper as well.
Nicholson seems like a nice kid, though. That's a plus.
I like Acy, seems to be a good player. But he turns 26 in october... If you're going to detract from the Nicholson signing for various reasons... fine... but not like 26 year ols make massive leaps either. Be consistent with your analysis.
Also, Nicholson took 7 3s per 36, Acy took like 2... I think one of these is a legit S4 while the other is a 4/5 who CAN hit a three. Ideally, I'd like both

The thing is... Acy is already a good player. You would be signing a guy who has shown he can play well in the league -- his numbers overall are above average. His TS% is .63; Nicholson's just under .57. Nicholson gets you 5.5 more points per 40 -- but it takes him 6.5 more shots to do it (39% on the extra shots). Meanwhile in those 40 minutes, he turns it over 1 more time than Acy, and steals it one fewer time.
As to age, tho, you are right. Acy is younger but no big deal in that.
All that said, I hope Andrew Nicholson is terrific. Last year was his best year so far. He wasn't any good, but he was better than he had been. If he gets better again by the same jump I'll be happy for him. Still won't make him a good player for us, however.