Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no?

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#1 » by pantalones » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:45 pm

PG: Russell
SG: Dipo
SF: Ingram
PF: Sabonis
C: Adams

Great young team, with an almost guaranteed lottery pick for next season, which is considered an excellent draft. What say you?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#2 » by spearsy23 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:46 pm

No.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
DaddyCool19
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,360
And1: 6,652
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#3 » by DaddyCool19 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:47 pm

Westbrook would walk after playing with Deng and Mozgov for a year.
Masterfully
Starter
Posts: 2,295
And1: 1,435
Joined: Jun 04, 2015

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#4 » by Masterfully » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:48 pm

Lakers can just sign Westbrook outright next summer and keep Russell and Ingram.
pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#5 » by pantalones » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:53 pm

DaddyCool19 wrote:Westbrook would walk after playing with Deng and Mozgov for a year.


He's from LA. He's gonna play on a lottery team in OKC or his hometown, but he has a good shot of getting the 8th seed with the lakers and they have a ton of room for next season.
pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#6 » by pantalones » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:54 pm

spearsy23 wrote:No.


care o elaborate? That team that I proposed has a lot of great young talent and a great lottery pick for next season.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,314
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#7 » by Boneman2 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:54 pm

Masterfully wrote:Lakers can just sign Westbrook outright next summer and keep Russell and Ingram.


Easier said than done. I thought LA was suppose to sign KD.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#8 » by pantalones » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:55 pm

Masterfully wrote:Lakers can just sign Westbrook outright next summer and keep Russell and Ingram.


Sure, but the Thunders phones are rining off the hook for WB as we speak, if the lakers want in on the hometwon superstar, they move now, not run the risk of him being traded to another team that can lock him up long term.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#9 » by spearsy23 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:56 pm

pantalones wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:No.


care o elaborate? That team that I proposed has a lot of great young talent and a great lottery pick for next season.

You want me to elaborate? Westbrook is **** Kobe, he's our guy and **** you for trying to poach him when we just lost Durant.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#10 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Jul 4, 2016 4:59 pm

You might try reposting this in a week.
Image
pantalones
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 220
Joined: May 20, 2016

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#11 » by pantalones » Mon Jul 4, 2016 5:08 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
pantalones wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:No.


care o elaborate? That team that I proposed has a lot of great young talent and a great lottery pick for next season.

You want me to elaborate? Westbrook is **** Kobe, he's our guy [b]and **** you for trying to poach him when we just lost Durant[/b].


I hate the Lakers with a passion. But DeAngelo Russell and Brandon Ingram is a great haul for him.
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,430
And1: 1,865
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#12 » by Kizz Fastfists » Mon Jul 4, 2016 5:24 pm

I'd settle for D'Angelo and Ingram for Russ. It'll take a few future 1st round picks to lock it up. D'Angelo has a good shot to be as good as Russ on offense. He's just as good at attacking and finishing at the rim, he should become an equal passer and he is a better shooter. His defense might never be as good, but he should be solid. Ingram gives them a potential prolific scoring wing. OKC would have a lottery pick next year, maybe they'd get lucky and it'd be top 3, but they'd have the money for a max player next off-season with Adams and Oladipo there they might be able to land Blake Griffin or Millsap. A lineup of D'Angelo, Oladipo, Ingram, Griffin and Adams would be very good.

I'd rather send him to Boston for Isaiah Thomas, who could be flipped again, Crowder, Jaylen Brown and big collection of picks including Brooklyn's firsts in 2017 and 2018 and a pair of 1st rounders in 2019 from two of Memphis, LAC and Boston.

Minny is another decent option if they would part with Rubio, Dunn and LaVine. Send Rubio off for more picks or young players.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,928
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#13 » by BadWolf » Mon Jul 4, 2016 5:57 pm

I'm sure Presti knows of Westbrook's intentions.
And frankly best move for either side might be to look for a trade.
If Russ wants to go to Boston, that is the best situation for both.
If he wants to go to Lakers, they might be pressured to send value cause they'd be afraid he'll go to some other team and like it there. Or they could play the waiting game. Melo/Nuggets/Knicks did and you know how that turned out.
User avatar
One Love
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 292
Joined: Dec 01, 2006
Location: Venice Beach - White Men Can Jump

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#14 » by One Love » Mon Jul 4, 2016 6:18 pm

Laker fan in peace... I am real sorry about KD... I thought he was a one team player (9 years)... I am sure you guys will be fine... Enjoy July 4th...
User avatar
Zagor
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 168
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
     

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#15 » by Zagor » Mon Jul 4, 2016 6:19 pm

Everything depends on Russ. If he wants to be main hero of NBA, he will stay and franchise will try to move on from this situation.
If he doesn't see his future in OKC, trade with Boston would probably be the best option.
Ball like Cody
Ballboy
Posts: 40
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 13, 2016

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#16 » by Ball like Cody » Mon Jul 4, 2016 7:38 pm

No chance on trading Russ. Donovan already said he wouldn't trade Russ for anyone in the league. It's just not happening. In Russ we trust.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#17 » by bondom34 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 7:42 pm

OKC.

He's not getting dealt.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#18 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Jul 4, 2016 7:50 pm

bondom34 wrote:OKC.

He's not getting dealt.


I wouldn't be 100% on that. If he wants to stay and have the team built around him, they'll keep him for sure. If he wants to leave in FA Presti will dump him like a hot potato.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#19 » by bondom34 » Mon Jul 4, 2016 7:55 pm

dbrandon wrote:
bondom34 wrote:OKC.

He's not getting dealt.


I wouldn't be 100% on that. If he wants to stay and have the team built around him, they'll keep him for sure. If he wants to leave in FA Presti will dump him like a hot potato.

Agree, but my heart still wants him to stay. :(
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,430
And1: 1,865
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Goatbrook for Russell and Ingram, who says no? 

Post#20 » by Kizz Fastfists » Mon Jul 4, 2016 8:23 pm

My heart wants him to stay, but my mind says trade him for a king's ransom and rebuild.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder