Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,393
- And1: 1,349
- Joined: Jul 06, 2015
-
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
Cody must be super human. I watched that video for over 3 minutes and he was still pumping out the reps easy cheesy.
geometry
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
- SWedd523
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,491
- And1: 6,456
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
-
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
100 pounders aren't that hard for sets of 6, especially for a dude weighing in at 240. Doesn't really matter to me though because he's definitely one of the more athletically gifted dudes on the team regardless of his bench

Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 845
- And1: 338
- Joined: Mar 30, 2016
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
I like deyonta davis but i could see the wisdom in drafting Christian Wood
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
- JMAC3
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,224
- And1: 6,242
- Joined: May 22, 2010
-
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
I went with Dejounte Murray, but I see why the team made the trade. We would of not been able to replace Lins production on the open market with the money we had available. Belly and Sessions is a good backup backcourt and together will fill Lins void.
Seems like people are not really wanting to commit to this thread tho. Many said Luwawu, but then hedged by mentioning a few names. Also, like to point out only 1 person voted for Richardson, Skal, Korkmaz and Murray, so when they end up being the best player after 22 a whole crowd of posters can't state thats who they would of taken.
Everybody needs to man up and just post who they would of taken so there is no craziness when Zubac is this years Jokic.
Clarifying I would of picked Murray.
Seems like people are not really wanting to commit to this thread tho. Many said Luwawu, but then hedged by mentioning a few names. Also, like to point out only 1 person voted for Richardson, Skal, Korkmaz and Murray, so when they end up being the best player after 22 a whole crowd of posters can't state thats who they would of taken.
Everybody needs to man up and just post who they would of taken so there is no craziness when Zubac is this years Jokic.
Clarifying I would of picked Murray.
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
- Diop
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 40,392
- And1: 20,758
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: Diop Dead Ugly
-
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
I was calling for either Z boys all the way up to the draft, but as I said earlier I'm happy to support Cho in this draft. He needed to use that pick to find a solid, reasonably priced backup sg, I hope Marco is that man

Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 845
- And1: 338
- Joined: Mar 30, 2016
Re: Poll: What should Hornets have done at #22?
The stats really like brice johnson but I just don't see how he fits in the nba unless he can develop a 3.
This is one of those classic stats vs the eye test. I feel like i should've learned my lesson but I'm going with the eye. I wouldn't take brice unless he showed he could hit the 3 in workouts
This is one of those classic stats vs the eye test. I feel like i should've learned my lesson but I'm going with the eye. I wouldn't take brice unless he showed he could hit the 3 in workouts