Mosdefinition wrote:Manitoba wrote:Prokorov wrote:
thats some funky math. not sure how 2/5 of the starting lineup = 70%. last i checked that would make 40%.
You were checking in the wrong place, as usual. We have good people at the 1 and 5, the hardest positions to fill. Since we have indeed filled them, that's far more than half the job done right there.we had jack/brook last year and were terrible during that stretch. Lin upgrades Jack but we also lost thad. Mo Harkless doesnt really move the needle.
Playmaking matters; Lin is far better than Jack at it. Also, the Brook/Jack combo didn't work well because Thad wasn't stretching the floor. We'll probably fix that, perhaps by getting Harkless, who shot 39% on 3s in his second year.how many teams can make us pay? pretty much all of them. nearly every offense features the pick and roll, and lopez cant defed it.
Lin's defense was why I mentioned him. He'll protect Brook from a lot of penetration, and that will be a huge help.i envy your optomism, but this projects as a 15-25 win team
Let's see what this team looks like at season start, shall we? I can think of lots ways to improve, so pretty good improvement seems likely to me. There are reasons for optimism.
How can you say Lin is far better than jack at playmaking when all of the advanced analysis that people have been using say they are essential the exact same player
Once again, we will know if he is a better play-maker than Jack once the season starts. No point arguing over something when there is no fair comparison. One full season, then we will find out.








How about donate to Nets forum! 






