A lot of Celtics Trash rumors part 3

[BigTrade92]

Boston going to LA to talk to Westbrook or Griffin is considered shady. It would give them a leg up on other teams that might want to pry him away in 2017 free agency.

It's such an incredibly stupid notion that I can't even imagine how much people in any other NBA community would laugh at it.

LOL holy moly, this guy....

There's a thing called "permission" that can be granted.

Do you know much about the business side of basketball? Or is the ball going through the hoop the extent of your knowledge?

Thats already been discussed. Link me to the news that the Clippers or Thunder have granted us permission to talk to him. Because that has to be filed through the league and it's made public.

So it's been discussed you don't know anything about basketball?

Great. Now stop posting.

You've offered this board absolutely nothing since joining and every post you make is opininated trash with absolutely no factual backing.

[GreenBloodedC]

I just went out for a snack and when I came back, you guys are already discussing about tampering.

Man, I love this board

[Smitty731]

I'm sure it's happened many times due to coincidence. Like those people claiming to have inside knowledge because they called the Celtics signing Horford along with most of the Celtics fanbase lol.

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

You're the only one for sure I know is a kid. I'll be 38 in less than two weeks. I'm far from a kid. I write professionally. I have real risk in putting random crap out there. Unlike you who will only lose credibility in the lunch line at jr high.

[truth18]

I'm sure it's happened many times due to coincidence. Like those people claiming to have inside knowledge because they called the Celtics signing Horford along with most of the Celtics fanbase lol.

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

Dude there are around five people here who believe this fool Deadmik3, and most of those five don't even seem serious.

You're just walking around screaming the same **** to yourself over and over again. This isn't Harvard Square. That **** doesn't fly. So annoying.

[bassis666]

From SI, October 2007:

By this time Garnett was willing to consider a contract extension with the Celtics. So on July 20, with Minnesota's permission, Ainge flew to California for a one-on-one in Garnett's Malibu backyard. During the 90-minute conversation they discussed how KG would fit in with the Celtics and worked out the general terms of his salary: combining the two years remaining on his current contract (enhanced by a 15% trade kicker) and a three-year, $56 million extension, Garnett would earn a total of $104.9 million over the next five seasons in Boston. "It was probably the most simple negotiation I've been through," says Garnett.

Guess you don't need the league's permission after all, just the team's.

[BigTrade92]

From SI, October 2007:

By this time Garnett was willing to consider a contract extension with the Celtics. So on July 20, with Minnesota's permission, Ainge flew to California for a one-on-one in Garnett's Malibu backyard. During the 90-minute conversation they discussed how KG would fit in with the Celtics and worked out the general terms of his salary: combining the two years remaining on his current contract (enhanced by a 15% trade kicker) and a three-year, $56 million extension, Garnett would earn a total of $104.9 million over the next five seasons in Boston. "It was probably the most simple negotiation I've been through," says Garnett.

Guess you don't need the league's permission after all, just the team's.

Shhhhh don't tell Jimmy Wade that....

Apparently he knows more than even the most seasoned posters on this board, even though his knowledge of basketball is 0% percent....

[BannersOnly]

This thread must be what's it's like to sit around with with a bunch of old lady's at a hair salon all day. Come up for air already.

[SichtingLives]

old men at DD imo

[Captain_Caveman]

The league 100% will not stop a trade, unless there is clearly something shady happening.

And I will say that many around the league hope another true super team emerges to challenge GSW. Not that Cleveland cant, but another true one would be helpful.

And most think the best chance, by far, of that happening is in Boston.

Boston going to LA to talk to Westbrook or Griffin is considered shady. It would give them a leg up on other teams that might want to pry him away in 2017 free agency.

It's such an incredibly stupid notion that I can't even imagine how much people in any other NBA community would laugh at it.

What is wrong with you?

[truth18]

old men at DD imo

lol. Heard some **** gems at DD.

[SichtingLives]

fwiw the guys who were upset with circlejerk were wrong. the term you have beef with is known as a jerk circle. glad i could clear that up.

[pinoyceltic]

I'm sure it's happened many times due to coincidence. Like those people claiming to have inside knowledge because they called the Celtics signing Horford along with most of the Celtics fanbase lol.

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

Seriously man, you need to chill out. You've been posting the same blabber ever since. What's wrong? Skepticism is OK at times, but you're going beyond brotha.

Piece of advice, get laid.

[truth18]

fwiw the guys who were upset with circlejerk were wrong. the term you have beef with is known as a jerk circle. glad i could clear that up.

A jerk circle isn't about cooking chicken together?

[Roddy]

This thread was fun yesterday, talking about food, wine and dildo...

Now it's about tampering...how boring it is !!!

[OFWGKTA]

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

You're the only one for sure I know is a kid. I'll be 38 in less than two weeks. I'm far from a kid. I write professionally. I have real risk in putting random crap out there. Unlike you who will only lose credibility in the lunch line at jr high.

He's 30! He has an office! Show some respect!

[WadeItOut]

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

You're the only one for sure I know is a kid. I'll be 38 in less than two weeks. I'm far from a kid. I write professionally. I have real risk in putting random crap out there. Unlike you who will only lose credibility in the lunch line at jr high.

I have no idea why you are ranting. I'm not referring to you in any context. It's pretty obvious who specifically I am referring to on Twitter.

[WadeItOut]

You've been nothing but a skeptic since you joined the board. Do you get off on calling people out? That must be it, because you can't possibly have another good reason for it.

If you don't want to believe that some of us know stuff, that is cool. But you don't need to post it over and over and over. We get it man. Either offer something or go away.

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

Seriously man, you need to chill out. You've been posting the same blabber ever since. What's wrong? Skepticism is OK at times, but you're going beyond brotha.

Piece of advice, get laid.

Have I been wrong about something yet? I said we had no real chance to get KD over Golden State and I said these Westbrook/Griffin rumors are fabricated. I'm still waiting to be proven wrong about either.

[pinoyceltic]

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

You're the only one for sure I know is a kid. I'll be 38 in less than two weeks. I'm far from a kid. I write professionally. I have real risk in putting random crap out there. Unlike you who will only lose credibility in the lunch line at jr high.

I have no idea why you are ranting. I'm not referring to you in any context. It's pretty obvious who specifically I am referring to on Twitter.

Then bring your bag full of skepticism and sadness to Twitter, not here.

[WadeItOut]

You're the only one for sure I know is a kid. I'll be 38 in less than two weeks. I'm far from a kid. I write professionally. I have real risk in putting random crap out there. Unlike you who will only lose credibility in the lunch line at jr high.

I have no idea why you are ranting. I'm not referring to you in any context. It's pretty obvious who specifically I am referring to on Twitter.

Then bring your bag full of skepticism and sadness to Twitter, not here.

Sadness lol. Yeah because my team getting a future Hall of Famer would just absolutely shatter my heart. There is a difference between realism, and skepticism.

[DarkAzcura]

I believe a lot of people. I've posted several tweets by trusted insiders like the string of Adam tweets last night.

I'm sorry someone is interfering with an ignorance circle jerk in regards to kids lying on Twitter.

Seriously man, you need to chill out. You've been posting the same blabber ever since. What's wrong? Skepticism is OK at times, but you're going beyond brotha.

Piece of advice, get laid.

Have I been wrong about something yet? I said we had no real chance to get KD over Golden State and I said these Westbrook/Griffin rumors are fabricated. I'm still waiting to be proven wrong about either.

You currently have the second most posts in a thread about rumors when you apparently don't believe any rumor or even want to acknowledge any rumor as a possibility. Do you really not see the issue here?