Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
GI_Slow
Pro Prospect
Posts: 771
And1: 381
Joined: Jul 08, 2014
Location: Valdivia, Chile
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#21 » by GI_Slow » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:29 am

Pretty sure Knight made their teammates worse while in Milwaukee (except for 1 or 2)
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 15,205
And1: 5,044
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#22 » by JonFromVA » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:36 am

Scalabrine wrote:2 Seasons ago the Bucks came out of nowhere with Jason Kidd as the coach. They were composed of a mix of veterans and young players and were 41-41. Definitely overachieved what most fans and analysts predicted.


When a team makes a jump like the Bucks did, you can't always just extend that upwards line.

Fact is the Buck's offense has been 26th in the league the past two years, while their D has dropped from 4th to 23rd.

I'd look for your answer right there ...
Frank Dux
Head Coach
Posts: 6,787
And1: 10,753
Joined: Jul 08, 2009
   

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#23 » by Frank Dux » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:39 am

That Monroe/Parker front court pairing is a disaster.
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,542
And1: 7,261
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#24 » by giberish » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:48 am

Monroe takes a ton of blame for their defensive downgrade, but it was mostly from the forward spot. They had a very effective rotation with Giannis/Dudley/Illysova. Then the lost Dudley and Illysova and replaced them with more minutes from Parker and a void off the bench. Not only were the bench players very weak but Parker was a disaster on defense as well (Monroe didn't really help but he wasn't the main problem).

Parker's young enough that he should improve on defense, the question is how much better does he get (and can his offense become good enough that he's valuable even as a below-average defender). Teletovic will help some off the bench. He's not great but can work as a competent team defender as Dudley and Illysova were. Overall they should be at least partly back next season.
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,685
And1: 3,628
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#25 » by sixerswillrule » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:51 am

Their ORtg was 26th in 2015 and 26th in 2016.

Their DRtg was 4th in 2015 and 23rd in 2016.

That's a pretty massive drop.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,784
And1: 44,041
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#26 » by zimpy27 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:55 am

lars_rosenberg wrote:Sure they can.
Losing Zaza and adding Monroe was a problem because it destroyed their defense. Two years ago they were the second best defense in the league and despite a bad offense they managed to be very competitive.
Parker replacing Ilyasova also meant less spacing, especially when the PG was MCW who can't shoot.

Dellavedova is a good shooter and with Giannis running the point he'd basically be a 3 and D guard, which is his perfect role, so I think he'll be a very good fit next to Middleton and Antetokounmpo.
Monroe's offense is valuable, but he should come off the bench and lead the second unit. The starting five works better with Plumlee or Henson.
They need at least another decent shooter in the starting 5 and I don't think it's going to be Giannis, so Jabari has to start shooting.
If that happens they will make the playoff and I see them getting better every year.
Giannis is special, but his broken jumper means his teammates need to be handpicked to fit until he gets better (he will, his mechanic is not bad).


I think this too. I think they are perfect from 1-3 with Dellavedova, Middleton and Giannis. They need to sort out their front court. I actually think Thon should be the PF with Monroe at C. That's unpopular because Jabari is one of their best young players but the spacing is really bad unless they can make Thon fill out enough to be a C.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Cosmic_Backlash
Junior
Posts: 495
And1: 272
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#27 » by Cosmic_Backlash » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:57 am

I feel like bucks are a really polarizing team because a lot of people like to circlejerk about how great Giannis is and how bad Monroe is.

Facts are Monroe led the bucks in Win Shares, PER, and was 2nd in On/Off Performance. He has his flaws - he's not an elite defensive center, but holy hell it's ridiculous how much centers with an offensive game are hated on because they aren't an elite 2-way player.

Everyone loves Giannis, but nobody ever looks at how he hurts the bucks. He's a terrible outside threat shooting an abysmal 25% from 3. He also didn't shoot above 35% from any range past 5 feet. Let me say that again. He shot 35% or less for every range past 5 feet.

On the other end of the floor while defending past 15 feet opponents shot 2.4% better when defended by him. When guarding the 3 point shot, opponents shot 3.8% better. However, he is an elite interior defender with his long arms, opponents shoot 8% worse in the paint when defended by him.

With this being said, Bucks have a chance to be great - but they need to figure out their outside shooting if they want to succeed. It's just so disappointing seeing so many people say "omg, Giannis is going to be the best" and "Monroe is dragging the whole team down". Open your eyes, look at the good and bad of both players and how the team is constructed. Yeah, the team is long - too bad most of their players have critical flaws while their strengths, at this point time, don't compliment each other. I will say they're lucky they got MIddleton locked up - he's a huge key to their success when they do have it.
User avatar
ZeppelinPage
Head Coach
Posts: 6,420
And1: 3,389
Joined: Jun 26, 2008
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#28 » by ZeppelinPage » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:04 am

Losing the slow turd that is Monroe would be a great start.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 43,337
And1: 61,666
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: ▼VII▲VIII
         

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#29 » by Froob » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:27 am

Milbuck wrote:Brandon Knight isn't a great fit. People need to understand that being a great fit goes beyond just your skill set. His approach to the game mentally and style wise just didn't and won't ever fit with what we need next to the core trio going forward.

The Lakers' pick was a much better fit...
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,332
And1: 44,670
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#30 » by Prez » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:39 am

Froob wrote:
Milbuck wrote:Brandon Knight isn't a great fit. People need to understand that being a great fit goes beyond just your skill set. His approach to the game mentally and style wise just didn't and won't ever fit with what we need next to the core trio going forward.

The Lakers' pick was a much better fit...

:(

This I can agree with.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,396
And1: 25,594
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#31 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:56 am

thierry wrote:Knight is a perfect fit for the Middleton / Freak / Parker

Nah.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#32 » by Spens1 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:04 am

Milbuck wrote:
kvash37 wrote:Can anyone speak on why Jabari barely takes any 3's? He seems like a better shooter than someone who took 35 all of last year.

He was literally instructed by Kidd not to shoot 3s, much like Giannis was in his 2nd year. Something about developing their inside games. He said he's done with that and will let them loose next year.

I think people are going to be surprised at good a shooter Jabari ends up being. Not only was he a 20 year old coming off an ACL injury but he was told by his coach not to shoot from range. But he has great form and touch on his shot and shooting was never really a problem in high school or college for him, he'll be good going forward.


then jason kidd is clearly not fit to be an nba coach in the modern game since you need to be able to shoot the 3 (even if he couldn't for most of his career)
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,902
And1: 67,653
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#33 » by Duke4life831 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:05 am

If I'm the Bucks I think I just ride and die with Henson and Plumlee getting the main minutes at the 5 with Thon probably getting some scrap minutes there. Plumlee and Henson both do what the Bucks need from their 5, protect the rim, defend PnR and rebound. Then offensively just set screens, catch some lob passes and just get out of Giannis and Paker's way. Monroe just doesn't fit, he needs the ball and his best asset is scoring. I think they should keep trying to trade him to get another guard or wing that can spread the floor
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,902
And1: 67,653
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#34 » by Duke4life831 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:09 am

Spens1 wrote:
Milbuck wrote:
kvash37 wrote:Can anyone speak on why Jabari barely takes any 3's? He seems like a better shooter than someone who took 35 all of last year.

He was literally instructed by Kidd not to shoot 3s, much like Giannis was in his 2nd year. Something about developing their inside games. He said he's done with that and will let them loose next year.

I think people are going to be surprised at good a shooter Jabari ends up being. Not only was he a 20 year old coming off an ACL injury but he was told by his coach not to shoot from range. But he has great form and touch on his shot and shooting was never really a problem in high school or college for him, he'll be good going forward.


then jason kidd is clearly not fit to be an nba coach in the modern game since you need to be able to shoot the 3 (even if he couldn't for most of his career)


I don't think it was all that dumb of a move. If the Bucks were looked at as contenders last year than ya I would say it was dumb. But they're clearly a young team on the rise that aren't contending just yet. One of Parker's weaknesses in high school and Duke was getting by his man in the half court. He struggled at it and because of that settled a lot for step back mid range jumpers. Now blowing by his defenders in the half court is one of his strengths. I think Kidd decided to play the long hand and try to develop his guys so when they're 23-24 are much better players. Kinda like in college where Calipari basically told KAT not to take 3s or perimeter jump shots and work on his low post game. I think that turned out very well for KAT having a year of games focusing on a weaker part of his game
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,332
And1: 44,670
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#35 » by Prez » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:19 am

Spens1 wrote:
Milbuck wrote:
kvash37 wrote:Can anyone speak on why Jabari barely takes any 3's? He seems like a better shooter than someone who took 35 all of last year.

He was literally instructed by Kidd not to shoot 3s, much like Giannis was in his 2nd year. Something about developing their inside games. He said he's done with that and will let them loose next year.

I think people are going to be surprised at good a shooter Jabari ends up being. Not only was he a 20 year old coming off an ACL injury but he was told by his coach not to shoot from range. But he has great form and touch on his shot and shooting was never really a problem in high school or college for him, he'll be good going forward.


then jason kidd is clearly not fit to be an nba coach in the modern game since you need to be able to shoot the 3 (even if he couldn't for most of his career)

I'm torn, one on hand it did delay their shooting development, but on the other hand there's been a massive improvement in both of their development as inside players. Jabari is turning into a monster finisher around the basket, and Giannis has made huge strides in his handles, footwork in the paint, post game, etc. Forcing them to develop their attacking game early on will prove to be beneficial.

They're going to improve as jumpshooters in time imo, both have good form and are relentless workers, they'll get there. Jabari I'm almost 100% confident will, Giannis less sure but he won't be a liability or anything, and at PF it won't be that huge a deal anyways.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,818
And1: 20,503
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#36 » by MrBigShot » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:38 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
thierry wrote:Knight is a perfect fit for the Middleton / Freak / Parker

Nah.


Why? He can defend his position & he's a good spot up shooter. Knight isn't a great decision maker, but Giannis can be the primary ball handler and playmaker.

Had you guys retained Knight (who's contract doesn't look bad at all under this cap) I think you would be better off for it at the moment. I get that Knight makes some bonehead plays every now and then, but he's a high character guy with a good motor who can be effective in the right circumstances. Certainly far better than MCW as a player.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,396
And1: 25,594
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#37 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:41 am

MrBigShot wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
thierry wrote:Knight is a perfect fit for the Middleton / Freak / Parker

Nah.


Why? He can defend his position & he's a good spot up shooter. Knight isn't a great decision maker, but Giannis can be the primary ball handler and playmaker.

Had you guys retained Knight (who's contract doesn't look bad at all under this cap) I think you would be better off for it at the moment. I get that Knight makes some bonehead plays every now and then, but he can be effective in the right circumstances.

I think he has skills that could be used, especially more than a guy like MCW, but "prefect fit"? Nah. He's not even the most "perfect fit" point guard on his team.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,332
And1: 44,670
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#38 » by Prez » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:43 am

MrBigShot wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
thierry wrote:Knight is a perfect fit for the Middleton / Freak / Parker

Nah.


Why? He can defend his position & he's a good spot up shooter. Knight isn't a great decision maker, but Giannis can be the primary ball handler and playmaker.

Had you guys retained Knight (who's contract doesn't look bad at all under this cap) I think you would be better off for it at the moment. I get that Knight makes some bonehead plays every now and then, but he's a high character guy with a good motor who can be effective in the right circumstances. Certainly far better than MCW as a player.

The problem with this thought process is that you're assuming Knight would be okay with this, which there is zero reason to believe that would be the case. He's an incredibly delusional, low IQ player who insists he's a point guard when he's not. This goes back to my point of "fit" going beyond just skillset. You have to factor in the mentality of the players you bring in, and Knight's doesn't mesh with our core, like at all.

In any case, we got a guy who fits way better than either Knight or MCW, so all of this doesn't really matter. Only thing that really matters at this point is dumping Monroe and finding a backup SF to balance out the roster.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,818
And1: 20,503
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#39 » by MrBigShot » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:13 am

Milbuck wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Nah.


Why? He can defend his position & he's a good spot up shooter. Knight isn't a great decision maker, but Giannis can be the primary ball handler and playmaker.

Had you guys retained Knight (who's contract doesn't look bad at all under this cap) I think you would be better off for it at the moment. I get that Knight makes some bonehead plays every now and then, but he's a high character guy with a good motor who can be effective in the right circumstances. Certainly far better than MCW as a player.

The problem with this thought process is that you're assuming Knight would be okay with this, which there is zero reason to believe that would be the case. He's an incredibly delusional, low IQ player who insists he's a point guard when he's not. This goes back to my point of "fit" going beyond just skillset. You have to factor in the mentality of the players you bring in, and Knight's doesn't mesh with our core, like at all.

In any case, we got a guy who fits way better than either Knight or MCW, so all of this doesn't really matter. Only thing that really matters at this point is dumping Monroe and finding a backup SF to balance out the roster.


As someone who watched nearly all of his games & a bunch of interviews for 2 years while he was a piston I absolutely think he would be ok with it. From an intangibles perspective Knight is great. Confident, hard working, competitive, high motor/effort all the time and practically no ego.

While he was here he also insisted he was a PG repeatedly. I attribute that to overconfidence and belief in himself; was drafted as a PG, you can't expect any player to simply concede that they will never fix their weaknesses, even if it's a long shot that they do. You have to have tremendous belief in yourself to make it to this level in the first place. Obviously we know that he's not a PG, his decision making sucks, and his basketball IQ is not his strong suit. But do I believe if asked to play defense, space the floor and minimize his ball handling he would agree? Absolutely. Ego or willingness to be coached has never been an issue for him, and he'd still get plenty of scoring opportunities on open looks & transition opportunities.

In any case, I'll be rooting for you guys to make the playoffs.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
TinmanZBoy
General Manager
Posts: 7,815
And1: 5,128
Joined: Jul 11, 2015
         

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#40 » by TinmanZBoy » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:25 am

the biggest disappointment last season, I had them top 4 in the east before the season...
Hi Clutchie, I love you... :kiss

Return to The General Board