ImageImageImage

Ty Lawson

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,959
And1: 15,115
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Ty Lawson 

Post#1 » by Laimbeer » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:04 pm

Any interest in him at the minimum as a third point?
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
RexRyan
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 408
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#2 » by RexRyan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:17 pm

Negative, Ghostrider. He needs to be a #2 pg somewhere or he'll be a distraction.....
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,857
And1: 3,450
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#3 » by theBigLip » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:20 pm

A year or two ago, I'd want to take a chance on someone like that since our roster was not that good. Now, we have a solid roster, good teammates, young talent under contract. I don't think we need to take a chance on guys like this anymore. It seems like we have two good options for our 3rd PG (actually 3 if you include Blake).
treefi
Analyst
Posts: 3,545
And1: 836
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Contact:

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#4 » by treefi » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:36 pm

I'd rather sign Chasson Randle.
treefi
Analyst
Posts: 3,545
And1: 836
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Contact:

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#5 » by treefi » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:41 pm

"After not getting a look the first two games, the Stanford alum exploded onto the court for the Knicks and never looked back. He played with confidence, aggression, and athleticism in hoping to prove he belonged. With the Knicks failing to hit the 50-point mark in each of their first two Orlando contests, Randle made sure to attack the basket early and often when he finally hit the hardwood. On his way to leading the squad with 18.3 points per game, Randle undoubtedly opened up potential scoring opportunities for others by penetrating and helping spread the floor a bit. He was also the team leader in assists (5) and three-point field goal percentage (48%).

The Knicks should get credit, not only for finding Randle, but also giving him the right platform to shine. The next move should be retaining him properly. It'd be a shame to see New York lose out on a potential fit and not have anything to show for it. Without any picks, the Knicks were forced to get creative around young talent. Randle should be a part of that. After playing overseas his rookie year, he's a bit more seasoned and arguably more comfortable as a professional."

https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/chasson-randle-gives-himself-a-chance-to-make-the-knicks-roster/189524864

18.3ppg, 4.3rpg, 5.0apg, 3.0spg.. . He shot 47.6 percent (20 of 42) from the field and 55 percent (11 of 20) from 3-point range. 40" vertical. 6'7" wingspan.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#6 » by coordinator0 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:11 pm

Maybe? I don't think he's a good fit at all but the same can be said for Smith and they're in the same mold. Not sure the potential distraction in the locker room is worth it though. I would rather the team go for Cole (if healthy) or Larkin if someone is brought in to replace Brown.
treefi
Analyst
Posts: 3,545
And1: 836
Joined: Jul 11, 2002
Contact:

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#7 » by treefi » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:19 pm

I dare say 2016 Ish Smith > 2016 Ty Lawson. I'm okay with Lorenzo Brown as third PG, definitely better than Dinwiddie. Plus the rookie from Syracuse could always surprise when he gets back and is at full health.
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,942
And1: 18,068
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#8 » by Snakebites » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:48 pm

I don't really see the point of gambling on a potential chemistry issue since he really wouldn't play much unless somebody gets hurt.
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#9 » by Spider156 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:33 pm

Ish Smith is better at this point of their careers. Ish is gonna be a great back up for us, he runs the point really well. Really reminds me of Brandon Jennings but probably without the fadeaway shot he randomly takes
Defense wins championships
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,267
And1: 9,757
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#10 » by tmorgan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:51 pm

Ish is a ton like healthy Jennings, except without the jumper -- which is good and bad. You don't get the insane chucking, and you don't get the hot streaks that win games.

Still a good backup and a solid player overall.
User avatar
dVs33
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 10,186
And1: 1,874
Joined: Apr 20, 2010
Location: Melbourne, Oz
   

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#11 » by dVs33 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:08 am

I'd rather give the 3rd string PG spot to a younger guy since we have a capable back up now.
Gbenije or Lorenzo brown should get a chance there.
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#12 » by The Penguin » Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:28 pm

I want Waiters.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,857
And1: 2,460
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#13 » by DetroitSho » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:02 am

The Penguin wrote:I want Waiters.

Waiters is ass
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#14 » by Manocad » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:05 am

No
Image
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#15 » by DBC10 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:15 am

The Penguin wrote:I want Waiters.


If we need a sixth man, sure, but we don't now with our depth.

I'll respectively decline.
User avatar
Alexander
Senior
Posts: 670
And1: 331
Joined: Nov 12, 2012
 

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#16 » by Alexander » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:26 am

Lance Stephenson, Dion Waiters, Ty Lawson...my answer is no for all three. We aren't even a franchise that is known for it, but we've had too many malcontents and knuckleheads in the last decade to last me a long while. I don't think any of them are the missing piece to our roster as currently constructed, but I do think they could be that jenga piece that makes the whole thing wobble, if not topple over.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#17 » by coordinator0 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:33 am

For what it's worth below is the list of remaining point guards (aside from the undrafted and international players). I don't think I've missed anybody but let me know if there's someone else that should be on there.

Blake, Steve
Chalmers, Mario
Cole, Norris
Cotton, Bryce
Dinwiddie, Spencer
Douglas, Toney
Farmar, Jordan
Goudelock, Andrew
Gutierrez, Jorge
Hinrich, Kirk
Larkin, Shane
Lawson, Ty
Miller, Andre
Munford, Xavier
Price, Ronnie
Sloan, Donald
Wroten, Tony

Lots of inspiring names there eh? :lol:

Van Gundy isn't going to cut Brown to bring in a guy at another position either. He likes having at least three point guards on the roster and Gbinije isn't going to cut it even as the third string guy. Maybe the fourth insurance point that the Pistons have had on the roster a few times in the past couple of seasons. That was mostly because of injuries but Gbinije is mostly a shooting guard or a wing too so it's fine.
joedumars1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,931
And1: 2,211
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
       

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#18 » by joedumars1 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:38 am

coordinator0 wrote:For what it's worth below is the list of remaining point guards (aside from the undrafted and international players). I don't think I've missed anybody but let me know if there's someone else that should be on there.

Blake, Steve
Chalmers, Mario
Cole, Norris
Cotton, Bryce
Dinwiddie, Spencer
Douglas, Toney
Farmar, Jordan
Goudelock, Andrew
Gutierrez, Jorge
Hinrich, Kirk
Larkin, Shane
Lawson, Ty
Miller, Andre
Munford, Xavier
Price, Ronnie
Sloan, Donald
Wroten, Tony

Lots of inspiring names there eh? :lol:

Van Gundy isn't going to cut Brown to bring in a guy at another position either. He likes having at least three point guards on the roster and Gbinije isn't going to cut it even as the third string guy. Maybe the fourth insurance point that the Pistons have had on the roster a few times in the past couple of seasons. That was mostly because of injuries but Gbinije is mostly a shooting guard or a wing too so it's fine.

Taking a flyer on Chalmers wouldn't be to bad. I'm not sure when or if he is going to come back this year tho. Not sure he'd like being the 3rd string PG either
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#19 » by coordinator0 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:15 am

joedumars1 wrote:Taking a flyer on Chalmers wouldn't be to bad. I'm not sure when or if he is going to come back this year tho. Not sure he'd like being the 3rd string PG either


Yeah, I don't think Chalmers has any real on-court value for this upcoming season. A point guard who's coming off of an Achilles injury at 30 years old can't get any more than the minimum even with some teams still having a good amount of cap space. Bad situation for Mario.

Sucks for the Pistons too because I thought he would have been perfect for what they needed a few weeks ago, then I remembered he got hurt. They don't have much use for him now since the third point guard actually needs to be able to play in an emergency situation. I don't think Chalmers can.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,959
And1: 15,115
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Ty Lawson 

Post#20 » by Laimbeer » Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:15 pm

Alexander wrote:Lance Stephenson, Dion Waiters, Ty Lawson...my answer is no for all three. We aren't even a franchise that is known for it, but we've had too many malcontents and knuckleheads in the last decade to last me a long while. I don't think any of them are the missing piece to our roster as currently constructed, but I do think they could be that jenga piece that makes the whole thing wobble, if not topple over.


I wouldn't put Dion in that group. He's got his warts but he's a young player with intriguing ability who doesn't have the same rap sheet. We probably couldn't afford him anyway. I'd take someone like Lance or Ty on a minimum or close to it. They act out, you show them the door.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy

Return to Detroit Pistons