Shewasfly wrote:NBADraft2003 wrote:Shewasfly wrote:I read somewhere else that this is all so that Riley can trade all of our youth for Westbrook. If that's the case, it would have made soooo much more sense to keep Wade. We would compete now with that team.
Westbrook-Wade-Ellington-Bosh-Whiteside
Like I don't even get it. We should have just traded McRoberts to clear room for Wade's contract and then did the trade for Westbrook IF that's the plan. Now we'll trade for him but won't have enough for another max player.
I'm not buying that we're trading youth for Westbrook when we can just sign him next offseason. You don't think they tried to trade garbage ass Josh McRoberts? Teams were asking for Josh, Justise, or picks to be attached. Still wouldn't have done it, we're already limited in assets as it is.
Nope, I don't. But whatever, let's see what the actual "plan" is. It'll be revealed, if there is one, and if its good or bad, soon enough.
Riley was at the end of the season press conference talking out of his ass about Josh trying to build his trade value, he's useless. There were reports that they were too, a little after free agency started. If the cost to move him was to have J-Rich, Justise, or any more first round picks attached to him then I wouldn't have done it either.























