basketballRob wrote:KingRobb02 wrote:basketballRob wrote:
As far as our moves people don't value defense the same as offense.
I think people kind of overvalue individual defense sometimes. We could have signed 03 Ben Wallace last month, but in the wrong scheme with the wing guys around, he wouldn't help as much as you think. It's just hard to judge how much defensive players will add since it's not as linear as offensive production.
Everyone says poor perimeter defense but that's really too be determined later. When you have to sink into the paint to help your center and you can't play up on your man because your he could get by you, then of course you're going to have a poor perimeter defense.
I really disagree with with this reasoning. The only really valid question is how much will Vogel's scheme mask the deficiencies of our perimeter defenders, the extent of which I am skeptical. I get that his defenses in Indiana were highly successful, but we simply don't have the personnel that those Indiana defenses had. Really, I'm particularly skeptical that any defense with Fournier on the floor can be highly efficient, but we will find out.
Our wings are poor perimeter defenders because they lack the physical tools to perform adequately in that regard. We traded away our best perimeter defender, by far, this summer. What makes Vucevic a poor defender is that he is among the worst in the league with help defense at the rim at a position in which it is a necessary function. It isn't really his inability to defend his position that makes him poor, but rather his inability to help mask the deficiencies of other players. Vucevic's on/off court defensive numbers weren't actually bad, unlike Fournier's. This essentially indicates that Fournier's defense adversely impacted everyone else's defensive numbers, not the other way around. Vucevic's lack of defensive versatility only compounds his defensive shortcomings as he can't defend anyone away from the basket. This means that Ibaka's assignment is likely to keep him far from the basket for most of the minutes they share on the court, as the NBA is littered with fours that can hit the corner 3 at a rate that compels you to cover them out there. Isn't this precisely the argument for why his numbers have deteriorated so dramatically over the last few seasons?
Vogel clearly places more emphasis on defending the 3-point line than did Skiles, and that can only help. But opposing teams with capable playmakers on the wings are going to eviscerate our defense. We have literally no one on the roster that we can situationally call upon to counter this. This is especially problematic in late quarter/half/game isolation plays.
I think we collectively greatly overestimate the role of rim protection in defense. For what it's worth, blocks don't actually equate to rim protection, but Biyombo and Ibaka both grade out well in the latter, so despite this common misconception it isn't particularly relevant as it pertains to this team. Toronto and OKC finished 11th and 13th respectively in team defensive efficiency with Biyombo and Ibaka.
Other teams with "elite" rim protectors and their teams' defensive efficiency rankings:
Miami (Whiteside) - 9th
Utah (Gobert/Withey) - 7th
Golden St. (Bogut/Ezeli) - 6th
Chicago (Gasol) - 15th
Boston finished 4th in defensive efficiency, yet the closest thing they had to a rim protector was Amir Johnson, who only grades out as slightly above average in that regard. Defense is a collective effort. You can't simply add a plus defender to your lineup and pretend that the liabilities have disappeared. We actually let Dedmon walk, though he was a solid rim protector.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991