FFL 2016 - 2017 - Discussion Thread

AlciG · Post #121 » by **AlciG** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 9:34 am

I'm interested in moving down from #25 into the mid/late 40s, or moving up from #65 into the same range...
Shoot me an offer if interested... alcig dot realgm at gmail dot com

Post #122 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 11:40 am

I want to move up to one of the upcoming picks, let me know if you have an offer

sabonis · Post #123 » by **sabonis** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 1:57 pm

Guys, I have a good amount of free time in my hands for a while. I can help with editing the first post of draft thread. But do I need to be a moderator for that?

fraanciiscoo · Post #124 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 3:12 pm

sabonis wrote:Guys, I have a good amount of free time in my hands for a while. I can help with editing the first post of draft thread. But do I need to be a moderator for that?

i wouldnt mind at all
in fact i would appreciate

Post #125 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 3:39 pm

sabonis wrote:Guys, I have a good amount of free time in my hands for a while. I can help with editing the first post of draft thread. But do I need to be a moderator for that?

Unfortunately that is the case

Post #126 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 3:41 pm

insfo wrote:
Woody Allen wrote:Trade with Insfo
18 23 103 233 for
15 26 106 266

Confirm

I have notified Woody that this trade needs to revised as Woody does not own pick 233

Woody Allen · Post #127 » by **Woody Allen** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 3:43 pm

Curtis Lemansky wrote:
insfo wrote:
Woody Allen wrote:Trade with Insfo
18 23 103 233 for
15 26 106 266

Confirm

I have notified Woody that this trade needs to revised as Woody does not own pick 233

I have reached out to insfo about it.

fraanciiscoo · Post #128 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 4:22 pm

Btw I could trade down for the late 20´s or early 30´s my #21 if you are interested ping me up

sabonis · Post #129 » by **sabonis** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 6:38 pm

Curtis Lemansky wrote:
sabonis wrote:Guys, I have a good amount of free time in my hands for a while. I can help with editing the first post of draft thread. But do I need to be a moderator for that?

Unfortunately that is the case

Maybe you can talk to the admins so that they can give me Mod for lik a few weeks during our draft? Btw, I don't give a **** about being a mod, I just want to help out.

sabonis · Post #130 » by **sabonis** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 8:01 pm

It will be fun to see Hopper vs Curt drafting. However Curt has he upper hand with the SG who is a pretty damn good fit with his Center.

By the way I think Whiteside slipping to 13 was a disgrace to this league. I don't believe it's possible for Cousins, Lillard and George to surpass him.

Post #131 » by **Curtis Lemansky** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 8:10 pm

I was between Whiteside, Dray and Giannis for my picks. Decided that KD's addition will hurt Dray slightly (I expect his assists to be around 5 which will drop him to top-30 level) and I cannot stand him either so I went with Giannis and Whiteside

Post #132 » by **floppymoose** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 8:42 pm

Green should have a big year. Durant's addition hurts him less than Bogut/Ezili departure helps him.

sabonis · Post #133 » by **sabonis** » Wed Sep 7, 2016 9:45 pm

floppymoose wrote:Green should have a big year. Durant's addition hurts him less than Bogut/Ezili departure helps him.

I disagree.

- Bogut/Ezeli both didn't play too many minutes. And neither are stat stuffers. It's not like they were stealing rebounds from Draymond.
- Green's minutes should not go up.
- Durant's arrival should decrease Green's ppg and apg. However his FG% could go up slightly.

So I expect a top 20-30 value, not top 15.

jfrost · Post #134 » by **jfrost** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 12:35 am

Trade to announce...

jfrost trades 35/46/92/166
från trades 22/62/102/222

I will select as soon as Fran posts his acceptance.

fraanciiscoo · Post #135 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 12:38 am

jfrost wrote:Trade to announce...

jfrost trades 35/46/92/166
från trades 22/62/102/222

I will select as soon as Fran posts his acceptance.

I accept
and i m off to bed
nice dealing with Mr Frost

fraanciiscoo · Post #136 » by **fraanciiscoo** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 12:43 am

my picks 35 46 59 92 99 139 142 166 179 182 219 259 262

jfrost · Post #137 » by **jfrost** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 12:49 am

My updated picks:

Lebron, Griffin, 62, 75, 86, 102, 126, 155, 195, 222, 235, 246, 252, 275

stick · Post #138 » by **stick** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 1:03 am

sabonis wrote:
Curtis Lemansky wrote:
sabonis wrote:Guys, I have a good amount of free time in my hands for a while. I can help with editing the first post of draft thread. But do I need to be a moderator for that?

Unfortunately that is the case

Maybe you can talk to the admins so that they can give me Mod for lik a few weeks during our draft? Btw, I don't give a **** about being a mod, I just want to help out.

This is realgm. Its 2004

Post #139 » by **floppymoose** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 3:12 am

sabonis wrote:
floppymoose wrote:Green should have a big year. Durant's addition hurts him less than Bogut/Ezili departure helps him.

I disagree.

- Bogut/Ezeli both didn't play too many minutes. And neither are stat stuffers. It's not like they were stealing rebounds from Draymond.
- Green's minutes should not go up.
- Durant's arrival should decrease Green's ppg and apg. However his FG% could go up slightly.

So I expect a top 20-30 value, not top 15.

You may be right about where he ends up, but if you are I expect it to be from reduced games. He was pretty healthy last season.

Moooose · Post #140 » by **Moooose** » Thu Sep 8, 2016 9:48 am

sabonis wrote:It will be fun to see Hopper vs Curt drafting. However Curt has he upper hand with the SG who is a pretty damn good fit with his Center.

By the way I think Whiteside slipping to 13 was a disgrace to this league. I don't believe it's possible for Cousins, Lillard and George to surpass him.

Depending on what you're trying to build, IMO. Cousins could've been ranked higher had he shot the ball well. Whiteside is just more efficient with the shooting percentages and minimal TO. And if one is going after rebounds and blocks, he is surely a prime candidate.

I was considering him at 12, but gave up on the idea after failing to acquire another pick before the 2nd round. That way, I would have drafted someone that would augment his strengths some more. I was not just in a position to be able to control who I get because I am picking at the middle.

Anyways, Paul George was a homer pick. Lol. Hoping this would be his MVP year.