Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat)

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Grade the Chicago offseason

A
1
3%
A-
3
8%
B+
4
10%
B
6
15%
B-
4
10%
C+
4
10%
C
2
5%
C-
4
10%
D
9
23%
F
3
8%
 
Total votes: 40

HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,316
And1: 20,910
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#1 » by HartfordWhalers » Fri Sep 9, 2016 6:09 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:HartfordWhalers Review

Key Losses:
Derrick Rose
Pau Gasol
E’Twaun Moore
Aaron Brooks

The Derrick Rose Chicago experience had to end. It just had to. In addressing that (and getting fabulous value), Chicago took a big step forward. On the other hand, losing Pau takes away a steadying player with still a lot of talent. Together, they averaged 33 points a game equally split amongst themselves (16.4 and 16.5 ppg), but one scored with a 48% TS% while the other did so with a 53% TS%. Say what you will about Pau's declining defensive abilities, but that offense was needed last year. A big question will be how well Wade fills in for it, and if it is no longer missed as a result.

Why are E’Twaun Moore and Aaron Brooks lumped in here? Okay, I'm overselling their loss by including them. Absolutely. I admit that. On the other hand, they were competent backup guards in a league thin of just that. They were 8th and 9th on the team in minutes, rotation players and helping to keep the team from complete collapse when playing. E’Twaun Moore is more of a loss going forward.

Losses:
Joakim Noah
Mike Dunleavy
Justin Holiday
Cameron Bairstow

Can you call Noah a key loss when he was just 12th on the team in minutes played, at just 635? Maybe. He does set a tone. But honestly, I feel like the tone was gone already. The peak Rose years (which really should be called the peak Thibs years), the team was known for a strangling defense and interior toughness. The defensive rating by year:
2011 -- 1st
2012 -- 2nd
2013 -- 6th
2014 -- 2nd
----------------
2015 -- 11th (Last year of Thibs)
2016 -- 15th (First year of Hoiberg)

The tone that Noah was emblematic of was already gone, and I'm left with an injured player that wasn't a key contributor.

I don't expect much from Dunleavy anymore, and while Holiday plays incredibly hard, his skill set is unrefined. The rest is not much of a loss.

Draft:
#14 Denzel Valentine
#48 Paul Zipser

Valentine seemed a safe and predictable pick. Well, safe minus any knee issues. The two guys that I would have strongly considered instead here would have been Baldwin and Luwawu. Ultimately, I think I would have gone with Luwawu (who DX mocked in at #13 with Valentine at #14, but on their big board versus mock prediction had Luwawu #12 and Valentine #25). Ignoring any knee concern, I don't see the need to have a refined older guy slated behind what seems Butler's natural position, so Valentine just seems a suboptimal choice. Luwawu may turn out to be a big bust -- his summer league did not impress me although I try not to make big judgments off that -- but his fit looks really great on Chicago as an athletic toolsy Snell 2.0 who shot 37% from 3 on the Euro league line. Baldwin would be an instant Rose replacement, both good and bad.

No strong feelings on the Zipser pick. DX apparently liked him a bunch -- https://web.archive.org/web/20160709184104/http://www.draftexpress.com/rankings/Top-100-Prospects/2/
So, maybe it is a good pick. He is not a guy I'm familiar with enough to say much on, but at 48 filling a position of need (3rd string sf) seems fine.

Trades:
Cameron Bairstow for Spencer Dinwiddie
Derrick Rose, Justin Holiday and a 2017 2nd to NYK for Robin Lopez, Jose Calderon and Jerian Grant.
Jose Calderon, 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd for the rights to Ater Majok (2011-58th).
Mike Dunleavy for a TPE (with foreign rights on both sides)

One of the most boring, one of the most exciting, a tack on move from that trade, and then a surprisingly important set up trade.

Bairstow for Dinwiddie was great because it started the offseason, both players got waived, and then Dinwiddie even gets re-signed. On an interest level, it scored way out of its league. For mattering, it clearly didn't.

The Rose deal was phenomenal. 34% of trade boarders voted Chicago won it, and another 17% voted "There is no way Rose has this much value, what are you thinking Phil????" I think it would have been more, but another 10% of us had to vote "I'm just too excited that Chuck has to eat crow on Rose's value". I know I did. Rose Trade Thread

I would have done Rose for Lopez as Chicago. The Rose experience needed to end. Getting Grant thrown in (admittedly with Calderon) felt like a big coup. One sided and then some!

But then seeing Calderon dumped with 2 decent 2nds makes me look back at it. If Calderon isn;' neutral value placeholder pg while Chicago resets, then what is the difference between 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd and Jerian Grant. Honestly, I take the 2 seconds.

So, I have the deal coming out as less than Lopez in value for Rose, which... is still better than break even and a winning deal for Chicago. And a deal they so desperately needed. Rose's efficiency was horrible, the defense had fallen apart, Noah and Gasol were leaving, Taj is expiring. Depending on if you found Rose negative value or not might influence what you think on if the value was a grand slam, but the fit and direction for Chicago were. The other two trades set up free agency, so I will discuss more in terms of that.

Free Agency:
Dwyane Wade 2/$47m (last year PO)
Rajon Rondo 2/$27.4m(last year 3m gtd)
Denzel Valentine rookie scale
Paul Zipser 4/$3.8m (first 2 years gtd, last year TO)
Isaiah Canaan 2/$2.1m (last year 200k gtd)
Spencer Dinwiddie 2/2m nongtd

Well, this got interesting. Last things first, but I would have signed an undrafted free agent such as Cat Barber or a Gary Payton II as a 3rd string pg instead of Dinwiddie. Canaan is a sg in a pg's body, but as an off ball 3 point shooter is worth that contract flier. The draft's been covered, so on to the big deals.

Wade -- You could argue he is better younger more athletic exciting scoring than Pau
Rondo -- You can argue he is better playmaking and less inefficient offensively than Rose

If you look at skills and not skillsets and how those skills are achieved, it looks like a bunch of clear upgrades. Rondo has had Dallas/Sacramento/Chicago fans excited when he joined them, and Boston/Dallas/Sacramento fans excited when he left them. Wade seems redundant in the way he scores, with the team now relying on a lot of ball dominant drivers. I don't expect it to totally backfire, but it also seems less than ideal for showing off the individual skills. Still, they got talent.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Rajon Rondo, Jerian Grant, Spencer Dinwiddie
SG: Dwyane Wade, Denzel Valentine, Isaiah Canaan
SF: Jimmy Butler, Tony Snell, Paul Zipser
PF: Taj Gibson, Nikola Mirotic, Doug McDermott,
C: Robin Lopez, Bobby Portis, Cristiano Felicio

I moved people a bunch. Canaan is not a pg, and someone needs to be slotted at backup center. Maybe it turns out Taj gets all his minutes there, but Portis made the depth chart look prettier.

Needs:
Mirotic and McDermott to hit their shots and provide spacing for all the drivers
Decent backup pg play (Grant/Dinwiddie/Canaan?)
Decent backup center play (Portis/Gibson?)
Health.
Rondo to get invested in team success, and a Rondo/Wade/Butler chemistry to develop

Additional Thoughts:
Every time someone suggests Wade to Cleveland I'm going to ignore them. Snell for a backup center is a trade waiting to happen.

Projected Win/Loss: 43-39

Off-Season Grade: C- I'm expecting a better year than last year, and if I just graded on that it could have been a high B, but the future isn't really brighter that I can see. And Chicago just spent a late lotto pick (#14), ~40m in cap room, traded away Rose, and 2 future 2nds. This feels like a year decent enough to save everyone's jobs, but not decent enough that they might not get fired in 2 years.


bondom34 wrote:bondom34 Review

Key Losses:
Derrick Rose
Pau Gasol
Joakim Noah
Mike Dunleavy

Losses:
Justin Holiday
Cameron Bairstow
Aaron Brooks
E’Twaun Moore

Draft:
#14 Denzel Valentine
#48 Paul Zipser

Trades:
Cameron Bairstow for Spencer Dinwiddie
Derrick Rose, Justin Holiday and a 2017 2nd to NYK for Robin Lopez, Jose Calderon and Jerian Grant.
Jose Calderon, 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd for the rights to Ater Majok (2011-58th).
Mike Dunleavy for a TPE (with foreign rights on both sides)

I loved the Rose trade as a possible moving on/retool, but they screwed it up in free agency

Free Agency:
Dwyane Wade 2/$47m (last year PO)
Rajon Rondo 2/$27.4m(last year 3m gtd)
Denzel Valentine rookie scale
Paul Zipser 4/$3.8m (first 2 years gtd, last year TO)
Isaiah Canaan 2/$2.1m (last year 200k gtd)
Spencer Dinwiddie 2/2m nongtd

Sigh....they really should have either retooled around Butler with solid younger players or just rebuilt to me. Instead they signed washed up/older guys to expensive deals in Wade and Rondo. I like the Valentine pick, but I think this is a borderline playoff team at best and a wreck if injuries or locker room problems pop up. I keep going back and forth on which.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Rajon Rondo, Jerian Grant, Isaiah Canaan, Spencer Dinwiddie
SG: Dwyane Wade, Tony Snell, Denzel Valentine
SF: Jimmy Butler, Doug McDermott, Paul Zipser
PF: Taj Gibson, Bobby Portis, Nikola Mirotic
C: Robin Lopez, Cristiano Felicio

Needs:
Youth, a better PG, and hoping Wade is healthy

Additional Thoughts:
I said it above, but they just seem kind of confused and directionless, I really can't say how much I wanted to like their offseason, and loved the Rose deal, but the Rondo and Wade moves just killed it.

Projected Win/Loss: 37-45

Off-Season Grade: D+ for Rose and Valentine


dbrandon wrote:dbrandon Chicago Bulls Offseason Review

Key Losses:
Derrick Rose
Pau Gasol
Aaron Brooks
E’Twaun Moore

Moore is the biggest loss here IMO. He's a steady journeyman who can play on and off the ball. The rest I'll cover a little more later on.

Losses:
Joakim Noah
Mike Dunleavy
Justin Holiday
Cameron Bairstow

Not much here worth commenting on. I'm a huge Noah stan, but he's always injured and hasn't been the same in a couple of years.

Draft:
#14 Denzel Valentine
#48 Paul Zipser

I like both of these draft picks. Good upside on Zipser, and Valentine should be useful now.

Trades:
Cameron Bairstow for Spencer Dinwiddie
Derrick Rose, Justin Holiday and a 2017 2nd to NYK for Robin Lopez, Jose Calderon and Jerian Grant.
Jose Calderon, 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd for the rights to Ater Majok (2011-58th).
Mike Dunleavy for a TPE (with foreign rights on both sides)

All of these are fine I guess. Trading Rose stings but he's not much of a loss on the court.

Free Agency:
Dwyane Wade 2/$47m (last year PO)
Rajon Rondo 2/$27.4m(last year 3m gtd)
Denzel Valentine rookie scale
Paul Zipser 4/$3.8m (first 2 years gtd, last year TO)
Isaiah Canaan 2/$2.1m (last year 200k gtd)
Spencer Dinwiddie 2/2m nongtd

OK:

You let Pau and Rose go and then replace them with Wade and Rondo? This is really weird. They're going to have NEGATIVE spacing.

I really don't like Rondo much, so that's probably influencing my dislike. Wade is fine I guess. I would have kept Moore and run Wade at the 2.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Rajon Rondo, Jerian Grant, Isaiah Canaan, Spencer Dinwiddie
SG: Dwyane Wade, Tony Snell, Denzel Valentine
SF: Jimmy Butler, Doug McDermott, Paul Zipser
PF: Taj Gibson, Bobby Portis, Nikola Mirotic
C: Robin Lopez, Cristiano Felicio

There are some solid players here. But I really don't like the fit.

Needs:

Spacing. Need shooters in the backcourt. Valentine needs to be solid straight away, and Snell/McDermott need to show something.

Additional Thoughts:

Projected Win/Loss:
45. This is still a good team, though mismatched.
Off-Season Grade:
C-. I just don't understand.


Slava wrote:Slava Review

Key Losses:
Derrick Rose
Pau Gasol
Joakim Noah
E’Twaun Moore
Mike Dunleavy

If all went well, Derrick Rose should be entering his prime now and for an ex-MVP its hard to not feel sad for him and the league to lose a superstar of that caliber to injuries. He was being compared to Westbrook at one time and now you could hardly put them in the same ballpark.

Owing to Pau, I watched this team more than anyone else but the Lakers over the past few seasons but I think he probably should have joined San Antonio when they initially made him an offer instead. I think he might have tipped the scale in atleast one of San Antonio's recent playoff losses. This could have been a nice fit had Noah stayed healthy but unfortunately that did not happen.

Moore & Dunleavy are the casualties of their desire to acquire Wade and Rondo through free agency and it puts a lot of responsibility on Snell and McDermott who are just not consistent and Valentine, who might not be ready.

Losses:
Aaron Brooks
Justin Holiday
Cameron Bairstow

I'm not even sure how Brooks is still in the league. He leveraged one good season under Adelman in Houston to a 7 year career since then. He is the entire gamut of awful from being a poor defender to inefficient scorer and he posted a -10 net rating last season. Good riddance.

Draft:
#14 Denzel Valentine
#48 Paul Zipser

If nothing else, Chicago usually draft well and the odd McDermott blip aside, they usually find solid value with mid to late first round picks and I like this draft for them.

Valentine is a savvy scorer with good vision and ideal size for the SG position and he might even play the lead ball handler in some line ups which gives Hoiberg the kind of versatility he usually covets.

Trades:
Cameron Bairstow for Spencer Dinwiddie
Derrick Rose, Justin Holiday and a 2017 2nd to NYK for Robin Lopez, Jose Calderon and Jerian Grant.
Jose Calderon, 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd for the rights to Ater Majok (2011-58th).
Mike Dunleavy for a TPE (with foreign rights on both sides)

The Rose trade was excellent return for a player they absolutely did not wish to retain in free agency. Lopez fits them very well alongside either Gibson, Portis or Mirotic and Grant will find Chicago's offense a refreshing change from the triangle.

Free Agency:
Dwyane Wade 2/$47m (last year PO)
Rajon Rondo 2/$27.4m(last year 3m gtd)
Denzel Valentine rookie scale
Paul Zipser 4/$3.8m (first 2 years gtd, last year TO)
Isaiah Canaan 2/$2.1m (last year 200k gtd)
Spencer Dinwiddie 2/2m nongtd

Winning the Wade sweepstakes was huge for them as I don't think a poor season with Butler's attitude and the constant friction between him and Hoiberg would have served them well.

Just as much as I like the Wade deal, I dislike the Rondo acquisition, not least because he is a poor fit alongside Wade and Butler here but he hasn't been a good fit anywhere since Boston and I don't think adding that additional bit of moodiness, self serving assist hoggery etc would do Hoiberg any favors.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Rajon Rondo, Jerian Grant, Isaiah Canaan, Spencer Dinwiddie
SG: Dwyane Wade, Tony Snell, Denzel Valentine
SF: Jimmy Butler, Doug McDermott, Paul Zipser
PF: Taj Gibson, Bobby Portis, Nikola Mirotic
C: Robin Lopez, Cristiano Felicio

Love the big man depth and the quality in backcourt if Wade can stay healthy.
Dislike the Rondo fit, which will eventually doom their season at a crucial juncture.
If McDermott shows some consistency and Valentine proves ready, this team could be a real handful on its day to anyone in the East.

Needs:
1. They need to learn the Rondo lesson sooner than later and get a different starting PG.
2. If they don't plan on retaining Gibson, he sould make way for bringing in said PG and open up the starting spot to either Mirotic or Portis.
3. Some semblence of consistency from McDermott and Snell.

Additional Thoughts:
Despite the roster turnover, there is a lot to like about Chicago and there's good quality left owing to their success in drafting consistently well. They will tread the waters and likely be a lower seed but I wouldn't be surprised if Wade and Butler click well and they make the 2nd round.

Projected Win/Loss: 44-38

Off-Season Grade: B


GimmeDat wrote:GimmeDat Review

Key Losses:
Derrick Rose
Pau Gasol
Joakim Noah
E’Twaun Moore

Losses:
Mike Dunleavy
Justin Holiday
Cameron Bairstow
Aaron Brooks

A lot of change here, but largely expected losses. Most fans are content to see Pau move on despite 2 AS seasons here, and the Rose deal was also about time. Noah is a big loss, he was the heart and soul of this group, though his impact may be mitigated from this point on due to health. Moore was also a hometown player who played hard on both ends and will be missed.

Draft:
#14 Denzel Valentine
#48 Paul Zipser

Most fans went in to the draft with youth and athleticism and their minds, and as usual, the Bulls went in a different direction, but Valentine was a great value pick and Zipser also has a chance to crack the rotation as a 2nd rounder. 2 mature, NBA-ready pieces to add in.

Trades:
Cameron Bairstow for Spencer Dinwiddie
Derrick Rose, Justin Holiday and a 2017 2nd to NYK for Robin Lopez, Jose Calderon and Jerian Grant.
Jose Calderon, 2018 Den 2nd, 2019 LAL 2nd for the rights to Ater Majok (2011-58th).
Mike Dunleavy for a TPE (with foreign rights on both sides)

The Rose trade was always going to be bittersweet, but you can't fault the return given his contract and form situation. Plugged several roster holes and gained cap relief. Mike Dunleavy will be missed but he didn't have much left physically and was a necessary move to free up space. Bairstow for Dinwiddie isn't a notable move, but Dinwiddie does have more NBA potential. Unfortunately, there's not much room for him to play a role here as he's the 4th PG on the roster behind Rondo/Grant/Canaan.

Free Agency:
Dwyane Wade 2/$47m (last year PO)
Rajon Rondo 2/$27.4m(last year 3m gtd)
Denzel Valentine rookie scale
Paul Zipser 4/$3.8m (first 2 years gtd, last year TO)
Isaiah Canaan 2/$2.1m (last year 200k gtd)
Spencer Dinwiddie 2/2m nongtd

Couldn't have asked for much more in FA. Wade was a pleasant surprise and a no-brainer, Rondo is a solid value short term deal at a position of need, and Canaan is a good fit next to the array of ball handling, not-great shooting wings we have.

Current Depth Chart: (taken from bbinsiders)
PG: Rajon Rondo, Jerian Grant, Isaiah Canaan, Spencer Dinwiddie
SG: Dwyane Wade, Denzel Valentine, Tony Snell
SF: Jimmy Butler, Doug McDermott, Paul Zipser
PF: Nikola Mirotic, Taj Gibson, Bobby Portis
C: Robin Lopez, Cristiano Felicio

Shooting will be a problem with this starting 5, which makes Mirotic a no-brainer to start at PF. Athleticism and perimeter defense will be the main holes with the 2nd unit, but there's some nice potential given the growth of some of the younger pieces, and some impressive 3rd tier depth in the case of injury.

Needs:
The Bulls continue to need more defense and athleticism, and better shooting in their starting lineup.

Additional Thoughts:
Interim moves to keep bums on seats. Big names, past their prime games, and an unusual match, but there's a lot of talent here and they do have real potential. They're filtering the young guys through for the future with Niko, Doug and Butler having expanded roles, and many other young guys with rotational roles as well.

Teams doing that can often be criticized of not picking a lane, but without the heavy expectations of winning now, I don't think having less experienced guys playing important roles on this team is as big of a deal.

Projected Win/Loss: 40-50 Anywhere between 40-50 wins seems like a fair estimate. There's a lot of question marks as to how guys will perform, how they'll fit together, and how healthy they'll stay, so there's quite a range of outcomes here.

Off-Season Grade: B- ...With mediocre offers for Jimmy Butler on the table, there's not a whole lot more you could expect of the Bulls to do this off-season. It was likely the right time to move on from Rose, and fortunate timing given the off-court events at the moment. The return was very solid, and for a fan-base yearning for change, the Bulls were able to luck in to the big name signing of Dwayne Wade.

Most fans aren't under the allusion that this is a contender or a long term direction for the franchise, but with that out of the way, it should be a captivating season or two with this group.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,247
And1: 97,968
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Sep 9, 2016 7:42 pm

I give them a decent grade just for moving on from Rose. That relationship had held the franchise hostage based on nothing more than local ties and an undeserved MVP. The guy had made it clear time and again that he was about Derrick Rose first, second, and last and imo when they changed coaches they should have done what they had to dump him then.

But Wade almost feels like an older version of the same thing. Feels like Hoiberg once again is being handcuffed by a local "star". Wade is still a far better player than Rose, but other than a feel good story, what's the play here? The overall team isn't very good and there is no future here. And now Butler who chafed at playing 2nd fiddle in public opinion to Rose now has to do it to Wade. I know Wade did the right thing and came in saying this was Jimmy's team---but its not going to be that simple with local media and fans.

I would have either dealt Butler for value and they clearly had suitors or I would have started building a team that made more sense around him. This just feels like a mess. Id try and sell as much as I could this season and start over again next summer.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#3 » by blind prophet » Fri Sep 9, 2016 7:44 pm

I've got the Bulls probably higher than most in standings this year.

But this is in the hard to grade category.

Wade & Rondo are not safe bets, but they are not "killed" necessarily next season if Wade Opts and Rondo is not picked up.

Bonus points for letting Noah walk with health concerns.

The Denzel Valentine draft is "what should have been done". I'm not sure if his lack of athletic ability is gonna turn out myself however, calling bust.

Could be maybe a B to an F if you ask me, can't vote today.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#4 » by loserX » Fri Sep 9, 2016 7:55 pm

Best move: probably the Rose trade; they did take on some future salary, but at a position that they knew was going to become vacant. Overall it was reasonably positive value for a guy they simply couldn't keep around any more. (I also like the Denzel Valentine pick.)

Worst move: signing Rondo. I didn't much care for it even before they got Wade, and with the benefit of hindsight it just looks worse. I thought the Rose trade and keeping their picks suggested they were going to go younger; I don't get why they gave Rondo two years at that kind of money.

I do like the Wade signing; he's on the downside of his career but he's still a star coming "home". He'll have a Pat Riley-sized chip on his shoulder, too. All that said, the spacing problems on offence are obvious; Hoiberg is going to have his work cut out for him, and it's only going to get worse if Rondo gets surly again.

It's hard for me to get a grip on what the Bulls were really trying to do. They added some kids in the draft, but then traded away 2nd rounders to clear cap so they could spend big money to add some win-now pieces but stuck them together in such a way that wins are going to take an awful lot of effort.

I'm seeing some grades in the C- range and that sounds about right to me.
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,174
And1: 3,948
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#5 » by Trader_Joe » Fri Sep 9, 2016 7:56 pm

I liked much of what they did.

Wade - nice. Hometown guy, still a top SG, chip on his shoulder
Rondo - I'm still a Rondo fan even though I shouldn't be. Was hoping the Nets signed him.

Let Noah walk - smart especially given what he got paid
Trading Rose - smart, time to move on and make it Butler's team (Wade's temporarily I suppose)

I think the Bulls will be a middle of the pack team in the East and probably make the PO, but I think they have the potential to do much more, and I'm not worried about them doing much less. Big year for Hobierg to prove himself.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,466
And1: 5,345
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#6 » by JordansBulls » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:09 pm

Considering I think the Bulls win between 57-63 games this year I gave us an "A-". We got one of my top 5 favorite players all time on the team in Wade and we also got another PG and got rid of the complaining Rose who was more talk than action the last 4 years. Not to mention the overhype Noah we got rid of.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#7 » by mattao313 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:22 pm

I gave them a D instead of building around Jimmy Butler they go and get big name players that don't even complement him in the slightest. It was already friction between Rose and Butler, why add 2 more ball dominate players?

Rondo hasn't been good in a while basically just a stat padder. Wade while he is still good he is older and clearly has regressed. Its basically replacing Pau Gasol with Pau only the SG version.
Championships
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#8 » by winter_mute_13 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:33 pm

I didn't particularly like Chicago's season other than maybe drafting Valentine. Wade is still good but the fit is very rough. I think the Bulls are one of the few teams that are more awkwardly constructed than the team I root for.

Should still be a playoff team because Jimmy Buckets.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 11,772
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#9 » by HotelVitale » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:34 pm

I think it's a solid 'B.' No homeruns but all the individual moves were modest wins, and altogether the team got better and a LOT more interesting. It's not like they turned down great FAs to sign Rondo/Wade, and they got them on straight-up UFA deals that don't cost them anything. I don't really see the downside, or any reason to give them a below-average grade: Butler is still trade-able if the team doesn't do anything this year, and they destroyed the Rose trade.

Last year they were more like a 46-win team that just didn't happen to win that many games, and I don't see how anyone could predict a 40-win team next year, when they lost Rose and Noah (negatives last year) and Gasol (close to neutral, though he was productive) and gained Lopez, Wade, Rondo, and Grant/Valentine/Zipser. I also don't think the shooting issues are disastrous: Mirotic is a very good shooter and will likely start, Butler is better than last year's numbers suggest, and McDermott is a totally reliable/possibly elite shooter who should be ready for bigger minutes.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 11,772
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#10 » by HotelVitale » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:40 pm

mattao313 wrote:I gave them a D instead of building around Jimmy Butler they go and get big name players that don't even complement him in the slightest. It was already friction between Rose and Butler, why add 2 more ball dominate players? Rondo hasn't been good in a while basically just a stat padder. Wade while he is still good he is older and clearly has regressed. Its basically replacing Pau Gasol with Pau only the SG version.

This is exactly the criticism I don't understand: what could they have done to 'build around Jimmy Butler'? Try to sign Allen Crabbe instead of Wade? There were no big-time talents who wanted to come there (or else the Bulls obviously would've signed them), so they signed a couple of high-upside vets to no-risk deals. It's a bit of a gamble, sure, but it's basically a one-year gamble that cost them nothing, and I don't see that there were any better plays for them. Plus they also got younger talent by swapping out Noah/Gasol for Lopez and picking up three young prospects in Grant, Valentine, and Zipser. And again without giving anything of value up.

(Also, the Butler thing is 100% speculation--none of us knows how he feels at all, and if anything it seems like there was friction between Rose and Butler because Rose was a really bad player last year. Butler was probably wondering why he kept chucking away despite his obvious inefficiency).
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#11 » by mattao313 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 8:59 pm

HotelVitale wrote:
mattao313 wrote:I gave them a D instead of building around Jimmy Butler they go and get big name players that don't even complement him in the slightest. It was already friction between Rose and Butler, why add 2 more ball dominate players? Rondo hasn't been good in a while basically just a stat padder. Wade while he is still good he is older and clearly has regressed. Its basically replacing Pau Gasol with Pau only the SG version.

This is exactly the criticism I don't understand: what could they have done to 'build around Jimmy Butler'? Try to sign Allen Crabbe instead of Wade? There were no big-time talents who wanted to come there (or else the Bulls obviously would've signed them), so they signed a couple of high-upside vets to no-risk deals. It's a bit of a gamble, sure, but it's basically a one-year gamble that cost them nothing, and I don't see that there were any better plays for them. Plus they also got younger talent by swapping out Noah/Gasol for Lopez and picking up three young prospects in Grant, Valentine, and Zipser. And again without giving anything of value up.

(Also, the Butler thing is 100% speculation--none of us knows how he feels at all, and if anything it seems like there was friction between Rose and Butler because Rose was a really bad player last year. Butler was probably wondering why he kept chucking away despite his obvious inefficiency).

Whats not to get. What else are they gonna do? Maybe don't sign Rondo who just makes zero sense with Butler. Its not a situation where a team couldn't get their first option and move on instead they get the worse option a non shooting PG, they probably could have kept Calderon and played him their since you both Wade and Butler on ball or maybe Deron Williams. Its like they winged it in free agency and had no plan.

Not only the fit bad with rondo he is a big personality that has had problems in the past.
Championships
RexRyan
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 408
Joined: Oct 30, 2014

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#12 » by RexRyan » Fri Sep 9, 2016 9:37 pm

I have no idea what they're doing, and I think they have no idea what they're doing. Perhaps they wanted to become Dallas-East with these patchwork free agents. But I'm happy to take all bets on the W/L line at 44. I'll go under. D
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#13 » by moocow007 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 9:52 pm

My opinion of the Rose trade can pretty much be summed up by 3 of the 4 guys on Chicago Sportstalk Live (didn't agree with baldy, and Kendal Gills crazy excessiveness was nuts but do agree that they shouldn't have traded him then for what they got)



They weren't brining him back. I get it. But I think they should have held onto him until at least the smoke cleared in free agency to see if someone who missed out on some of their options may be willing to give more than what they got from the Knicks. Has nothing to do with some who crazily believes Rose will ever be able to return to his old form (he's not). Has to do with just not the need to do this at the time it was done and for what they gave up and got back.

I do love the Wade acquisition (wanted him on the Knicks) and thought that the Rondo signing also was a very good deal for them. Rose and Rondo together I think will be a better pairing that what a lot of folks are thinking. Why? Cause Rondo plays well with EXTREMELY SMART players that can play real well and who are extremely competitive. Wade is EXTREMELY SMART. He's EXTREMELY COMPETITIVE, ESPECIALLY coming back home with a chip on his shoulder. Sure health may be an issue, but health would have been an issue with Rose as well.

Noah for Lopez (indirect swap of roster spots) is fine IF Noah wasn't able to become healthy but Noah brought something that Lopez doesn't and that's that intensity and ability to get everyone else on the team up. Lopez is a hard worker, and he has good skills, but he's a jokester at heart and he's simply not going to bring the type of leadership and intensity that Noah can bring. IF Noah can return to some form of what he was then it's debatable that the Bulls got better (remember as good as Lopez is said to have been, and he was pretty good, not great, the Knicks still sucked, they still played often with little life and focus). Leadership shouldn't be discounted. Of course flip side is IF Noah can't play much then his leadership would have been limited making replacing him with Lopez on the roster a plus. But there's no comparison to the impact that a semi healthy Noah would bring to Robin Lopez (and I'm historically a big Robin Lopez fan...you can check my post history since Robin came into the league).

In the end I give the Bulls a B (accidentally clicked B-). Again, they had to move Rose so the fact that he's not there isn't the issue, it's what they got for him. Considering how desperate the Knicks were for any upgrade at the point and considering how unlikely it was that the couple real good PG's were going to go to NY, even if the Bulls felt they only had NY to deal with, waiting until the Knicks didn't get anyone may have actually gotten them something more. What was the rush? To do Derrick Rose a good? If so, great, but I don't think that was the reason.

In any case, really liked the Rondo and Wade additions. I think they'll be fine as long as Wade can play. Rondo should also be real happy with Jimmy Butler. I expect Rondo to have a great season and that he will jive real well in Chicago. Would have been much better had Thibodeau still been there IMO but...

Also I'd like to say...I always thought it was very realistic that Wade would leave Miami despite so many people LOL'ing that Wade would never leave Miami whenever I mentioned that he could. Just wanted to lay that out there. The signs were clear to me even last off season.
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,321
And1: 7,081
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#14 » by giberish » Fri Sep 9, 2016 10:12 pm

I'd go C+

The Rose trade was a clear win. He's just not an acceptable starting PG outside of a tank. Getting a league-average starting center on a decent contract for him is a win.

Valentine seems fine as a mid-1st.

Rondo is the weak link in their offseason. While I'd put him ahead of Rose at this point, that's because I have Rose as the #30 starting PG going into next season. There weren't any great FA options, but IMO both Lin and Delladova are both better players and better fits while Deron Williams is a similar quality player and better fit. They may have needed to offer more than 1 year to sign them, but so what? It's now easy to turn useful players on sane deals into cap space if you need it.

Wade is OK but not great and makes the Rondo signing worse. He's overpaid based on his on-court value but brings some marquee value and there weren't good FA values last summer.

Overall the Lopez trade was a bigger win then the Rondo signing was a loss though the fit issues with Rondo/Wade/Butler keep the grade to a very mild positive.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 11,772
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#15 » by HotelVitale » Fri Sep 9, 2016 10:25 pm

mattao313 wrote: Whats not to get. What else are they gonna do? Maybe don't sign Rondo who just makes zero sense with Butler. Its not a situation where a team couldn't get their first option and move on instead they get the worse option a non shooting PG, they probably could have kept Calderon and played him their since you both Wade and Butler on ball or maybe Deron Williams. Its like they winged it in free agency and had no plan. Not only the fit bad with rondo he is a big personality that has had problems in the past.

If you really think the team would be better off starting 35 year-old Jose Calderon--probably the worst defender in the NBA and increasingly unproductive on offense--at point guard, then I won't argue. I'd guess that's a pretty lonely island but it's all yours if you want it.

And Rondo's on a one-year deal, and for all of his faults he's clearly a better basketball player than Deron Williams. I'm not sure who you think Jimmy Butler is, but he's not James Harden and doesn't want or need the ball in his hands every trip down the court. If Rondo stinks then nothing's really lost, and if Rondo's pretty good then they're onto something, the gamble's that simple.

If there were a good sweet-shooting, pass-first PG available--like time-machine Deron Williams--and the Bulls chose Rondo over him, or if they offered Rondo like a 4/$80m deal, then I'd get the criticism. But saying 'offseason is awful because Rondo is starting instead of Jose Calderon' doesn't move me.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,678
And1: 24,890
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#16 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 10:34 pm

Keeping Jose would have been a better fit than bringing in Rondo IMO. Unless they start Mirotic and somehow find a good guard off the bench that can stroke. Teams with no spacing make me sad.
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#17 » by Mystical Apples » Fri Sep 9, 2016 11:11 pm

2016 is just noise for Chicago at least they'll be competitive and interesting.

By cutting Rondo next summer and renouncing a few holds they'll have ~$70m in salaries. Moving Lopez gets them down to $58m. I'm sure part of the thought process is Wade recruiting a couple FA. If not, they can roll cap space to 2018.

Or I can see Wade and the Bulls mutually agreeing to part ways next summer if things don't work out. Either way they'll have options in 2017 or 2018.
geometry
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#18 » by mattao313 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 11:39 pm

HotelVitale wrote:
mattao313 wrote: Whats not to get. What else are they gonna do? Maybe don't sign Rondo who just makes zero sense with Butler. Its not a situation where a team couldn't get their first option and move on instead they get the worse option a non shooting PG, they probably could have kept Calderon and played him their since you both Wade and Butler on ball or maybe Deron Williams. Its like they winged it in free agency and had no plan. Not only the fit bad with rondo he is a big personality that has had problems in the past.

If you really think the team would be better off starting 35 year-old Jose Calderon--probably the worst defender in the NBA and increasingly unproductive on offense--at point guard, then I won't argue. I'd guess that's a pretty lonely island but it's all yours if you want it.

And Rondo's on a one-year deal, and for all of his faults he's clearly a better basketball player than Deron Williams. I'm not sure who you think Jimmy Butler is, but he's not James Harden and doesn't want or need the ball in his hands every trip down the court. If Rondo stinks then nothing's really lost, and if Rondo's pretty good then they're onto something, the gamble's that simple.

If there were a good sweet-shooting, pass-first PG available--like time-machine Deron Williams--and the Bulls chose Rondo over him, or if they offered Rondo like a 4/$80m deal, then I'd get the criticism. But saying 'offseason is awful because Rondo is starting instead of Jose Calderon' doesn't move me.

Jose Calderon isn't great but when you factor in Jimmy Butler who may not be Harden but he also has Wade on the team who is like a Harden both together are going to have the ball most of the time anyway, Calderon sound way better fit wise. They could have got a shooter at pg.

Deron Williams and Rondo are probably around the same impact wise imo but Williams has a much better skill set were he can actually shoot the ball.
Championships
User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#19 » by Kings2013 » Fri Sep 9, 2016 11:53 pm

Spotlight on Rondo. If he didn't fall on his butt defensively, and exhibit kind of a careless effort, he could have had a Kidd like resurrection in his 30s here. He shot better from the field and was still an offensive mastermind. I can't hate on our management s vision, and it will be interesting to see if he improves in a bigger market
User avatar
NYKnicksTAPE
RealGM
Posts: 16,889
And1: 13,426
Joined: Dec 05, 2014
   

Re: Chicago early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Slava/GimmeDat) 

Post#20 » by NYKnicksTAPE » Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:32 am

JordansBulls wrote:Considering I think the Bulls win between 57-63 games this year I gave us an "A-". We got one of my top 5 favorite players all time on the team in Wade and we also got another PG and got rid of the complaining Rose who was more talk than action the last 4 years. Not to mention the overhype Noah we got rid of.

57-63 wins for the Bulls next season can't be taken seriously at all...
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions