ImageImageImageImageImage

***The Thad Young Thread***

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,707
And1: 52,507
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#81 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:58 am

Prokorov wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:nets dont get good free agents, we usually get the leftover garbage.


we dont know what we will or wont get in free agency. we do know what we have in thad young, and we know thad young, while a nice player to have on your team, isnt the type of guy who has a big impact on wins and losses. he wasnt able to help us from being terrible(no fault of his own).

so im of the opinion, why not see if you can do better, because we really cant do worse. if anything, id prefer having the SG/SF version of thad young. even if just turn that money into another mediocure hard working role guy(jae crowder type?) at a position where we are super thing.

it doesnt need to be 2 superstar FA's for it to make sense to move thad. especially if you can get a pick. it isnt tough to replace what thad brings


Oh ho....interesting quote. :lol:
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/T. Bryant
PF: K. Kuzma/C. Castleton
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: S. Curry (lol)/C. Payne
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,707
And1: 52,507
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#82 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:00 am

jbeachboy wrote:i dont think we will get the offer we want for thad though. teams want to lowball the nets.


^this man is a prophet. he called all of this.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/T. Bryant
PF: K. Kuzma/C. Castleton
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: S. Curry (lol)/C. Payne
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,707
And1: 52,507
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#83 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:00 am

Prokorov wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:i dont think we will get the offer we want for thad though. teams want to lowball the nets.



it doesnt really effect us much getting 75 cents on the dollar for him because he doesnt help us much keeping him. you dont want to give him away but the cap space alone is alot of value


:noway: :noway: :noway:
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/T. Bryant
PF: K. Kuzma/C. Castleton
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: S. Curry (lol)/C. Payne
jbeachboy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,337
And1: 359
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
 

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#84 » by jbeachboy » Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:57 am

MrDollarBills wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:i dont think we will get the offer we want for thad though. teams want to lowball the nets.


^this man is a prophet. he called all of this.



thanks, i mean i didnt think thad could get us that raptors pick that was rumored and we had to settle for 20th pick. i wondered who we would have taken if levert was gone before 20.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 75,707
And1: 52,507
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#85 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Sep 10, 2016 12:54 pm

jbeachboy wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:i dont think we will get the offer we want for thad though. teams want to lowball the nets.


^this man is a prophet. he called all of this.



thanks, i mean i didnt think thad could get us that raptors pick that was rumored and we had to settle for 20th pick. i wondered who we would have taken if levert was gone before 20.


no clue
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers
C: J. Valanciunas/T. Bryant
PF: K. Kuzma/C. Castleton
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/L. Kennard
PG: S. Curry (lol)/C. Payne
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#86 » by Prokorov » Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:59 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:nets dont get good free agents, we usually get the leftover garbage.


we dont know what we will or wont get in free agency. we do know what we have in thad young, and we know thad young, while a nice player to have on your team, isnt the type of guy who has a big impact on wins and losses. he wasnt able to help us from being terrible(no fault of his own).

so im of the opinion, why not see if you can do better, because we really cant do worse. if anything, id prefer having the SG/SF version of thad young. even if just turn that money into another mediocure hard working role guy(jae crowder type?) at a position where we are super thing.

it doesnt need to be 2 superstar FA's for it to make sense to move thad. especially if you can get a pick. it isnt tough to replace what thad brings


Oh ho....interesting quote. :lol:


im still fine with the trade/value. the real failure is marks embarassment in free agency, not even able to get a starting calibur role guy on the wing
jbeachboy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,337
And1: 359
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
 

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#87 » by jbeachboy » Sun Sep 11, 2016 12:49 am

Prokorov wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
we dont know what we will or wont get in free agency. we do know what we have in thad young, and we know thad young, while a nice player to have on your team, isnt the type of guy who has a big impact on wins and losses. he wasnt able to help us from being terrible(no fault of his own).

so im of the opinion, why not see if you can do better, because we really cant do worse. if anything, id prefer having the SG/SF version of thad young. even if just turn that money into another mediocure hard working role guy(jae crowder type?) at a position where we are super thing.

it doesnt need to be 2 superstar FA's for it to make sense to move thad. especially if you can get a pick. it isnt tough to replace what thad brings


Oh ho....interesting quote. :lol:




im still fine with the trade/value. the real failure is marks embarassment in free agency, not even able to get a starting calibur role guy on the wing




he tried with crabbe and johnson but restricted free agency is hard. im not sure who he could have gotten that would replace bojan or rondae as a starter. no solid wing would have came to nets. he just brougt in mostly backup wing guys trying to become a starter or hope they pan out.
User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#88 » by ChokeFasncists » Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:35 am

jbeachboy wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:i dont think we will get the offer we want for thad though. teams want to lowball the nets.


^this man is a prophet. he called all of this.



thanks, i mean i didnt think thad could get us that raptors pick that was rumored and we had to settle for 20th pick. i wondered who we would have taken if levert was gone before 20.

My guess would be the wings taken right after LV.
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.
jbeachboy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,337
And1: 359
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
 

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#89 » by jbeachboy » Sun Sep 11, 2016 3:30 pm

ChokeFasncists wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
^this man is a prophet. he called all of this.



thanks, i mean i didnt think thad could get us that raptors pick that was rumored and we had to settle for 20th pick. i wondered who we would have taken if levert was gone before 20.

My guess would be the wings taken right after LV.



i would have taken bembry if levert was gone there.
User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: ***The Thad Young Thread*** 

Post#90 » by ChokeFasncists » Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:28 am

jbeachboy wrote:
ChokeFasncists wrote:
jbeachboy wrote:

thanks, i mean i didnt think thad could get us that raptors pick that was rumored and we had to settle for 20th pick. i wondered who we would have taken if levert was gone before 20.

My guess would be the wings taken right after LV.



i would have taken bembry if levert was gone there.

Ya, and if LV was gone, that means Beasley might be available.

Then there's Richardson, Luwawu, even Kormaz or Murray might be possible.
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.

Return to Brooklyn Nets