Pacific Division Offseason Review

[Smitty731]

Hey Guys!

My Pacific Division Offseason Recap is up for RealGM, complete with grades for this offseason and each team's long term outlook.

http://basketball.realgm.com/analysis/243330/2016-NBA-Offseason-Review-Pacific-Division

Any and all feedback is always appreciated.

Thanks!

Smitty

[dockingsched]

Hey Guys!

My Pacific Division Offseason Recap is up for RealGM, complete with grades for this offseason and each team's long term outlook.

http://basketball.realgm.com/analysis/243330/2016-NBA-Offseason-Review-Pacific-Division

Any and all feedback is always appreciated.

Thanks!

Smitty

to be frank it's laughable that the Suns have a long term grade of B+ and the kings have a B- and the lakers are at a C.

[Michael Lucky]

Yeah the contracts hinder more short term flexibility than any long term ones. By the time Ingram and Russell are up for contract renewals and they are good enough to help us be competitive, the contracts will be off the books anyways. Besides paying the luxury tax to resign your own players isn't as big an issue for the organization as it is for other teams.

[Danny Darko]

Kings do not have a bright future imo..
Suns have really just 1 bright spot and no real FA appeal...
The Lakers have more potential talent overall with development, max cap space next year, and if they show promise and culture under Walton they are definitely far better long term than both of those teams.

[ArC_man]

Kings do not have a bright future imo..
Suns have really just 1 bright spot and no real FA appeal...
The Lakers have more potential talent overall with development, max cap space next year, and if they show promise and culture under Walton they are definitely far better long term than both of those teams.

Explosions are bright