Greatest WWE Wrestlers of the Wrestlemania Era - #20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stanford wrote:I admit, he wasn't on my list. The bulk of his career as a mega-draw was pre-85. I felt there were 20 guys with better resumes.
Stanford wrote:The winner of the first WWE Crew t-shirt is...Spoiler:
Congrats! I'll get in touch within the next couple of days to have it shipped to you.
Max Green wrote:Stanford wrote:I admit, he wasn't on my list. The bulk of his career as a mega-draw was pre-85. I felt there were 20 guys with better resumes.
Same here. Andre could barely walk by the time I started watching.
Dunthreevy wrote:Max Green wrote:Stanford wrote:I admit, he wasn't on my list. The bulk of his career as a mega-draw was pre-85. I felt there were 20 guys with better resumes.
Same here. Andre could barely walk by the time I started watching.
Same. For me, he didn't do enough during the Wrestlemania era (over a long enough period of time) to put him in my top 20.
safi wrote:Dunthreevy wrote:Max Green wrote:
Same here. Andre could barely walk by the time I started watching.
Same. For me, he didn't do enough during the Wrestlemania era (over a long enough period of time) to put him in my top 20.
I had him on my list at 15. You make a fair point, but that WM 3 match was so big. There's a very real argument that match is, all things considered, the most important match in WWE/F history
safi wrote:Dunthreevy wrote:Max Green wrote:
Same here. Andre could barely walk by the time I started watching.
Same. For me, he didn't do enough during the Wrestlemania era (over a long enough period of time) to put him in my top 20.
I had him on my list at 15. You make a fair point, but that WM 3 match was so big. There's a very real argument that match is, all things considered, the most important match in WWE/F history
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
studcrackers wrote:
that's probably the only reason i gave him consideration, but ultimately didnt put him up there. of course that match is why i placed hogan so high so maybe my thinking was backwards there
studcrackers wrote:safi wrote:Dunthreevy wrote:
Same. For me, he didn't do enough during the Wrestlemania era (over a long enough period of time) to put him in my top 20.
I had him on my list at 15. You make a fair point, but that WM 3 match was so big. There's a very real argument that match is, all things considered, the most important match in WWE/F history
that's probably the only reason i gave him consideration, but ultimately didnt put him up there. of course that match is why i placed hogan so high so maybe my thinking was backwards there
LittleOzzy wrote:
Exactly! If you place Hogan so high based on one match, shouldn't the other wrestler who put him over also get the same consideration?
Without Andre, does Hogan become the mega superstar he is today so quickly?
LittleOzzy wrote:studcrackers wrote:safi wrote:
I had him on my list at 15. You make a fair point, but that WM 3 match was so big. There's a very real argument that match is, all things considered, the most important match in WWE/F history
that's probably the only reason i gave him consideration, but ultimately didnt put him up there. of course that match is why i placed hogan so high so maybe my thinking was backwards there
Exactly! If you place Hogan so high based on one match, shouldn't the other wrestler who put him over also get the same consideration?
Without Andre, does Hogan become the mega superstar he is today so quickly?
whysoserious wrote:LittleOzzy wrote:
Exactly! If you place Hogan so high based on one match, shouldn't the other wrestler who put him over also get the same consideration?
Without Andre, does Hogan become the mega superstar he is today so quickly?
I don't think Hogan's entire legacy though is that one match, and to me that's the difference. It was obviously an important match set up Hogan to take over, but he was already the face before that match, it just passed the torch of eras.