Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

robbysteinz · Post #1 » by **robbysteinz** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:50 pm

Oh boy. LAPD confirms.

New title to reflect updated info. XOXO - Cap

Post #2 » by **King of Canada** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:54 pm

We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.

F N 11 · Post #3 » by **F N 11** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:55 pm

King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.

Her name is already out though

And whats your source? I see one link and its not scary at all.

camillepd · Post #4 » by **camillepd** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:58 pm

This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.

Post #5 » by **King of Canada** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:01 pm

K P 6 wrote:
King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.

Her name is already out though

And whats your source? I see one link and its not scary at all.

It's out there, but it's not really OUT there in the mainstream media yet. I don't have a source, but I have heard rumblings from here and there over the last week. I don't buy a clearly biased source like the one posted, but I wouldn't be surprised to see more official sources reporting it.

Jay10 · Post #6 » by **Jay10** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:02 pm

This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.

Post #7 » by **moocow007** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:07 pm

camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.

Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.

NYKBaller · Post #8 » by **NYKBaller** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:09 pm

moocow007 wrote:
camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.

Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.

Without the plaintiff cooperation the case wouldn't have any real substance

Post #9 » by **King of Canada** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:10 pm

moocow007 wrote:
camillepd wrote:This puts pressure on roses legal team to quickly settle.

Possibly. Though from what I understand even though the plaintiff drops charges the prosecutor can still choose to continue with the case. So it's a risky ploy.

That's what I was thinking. The state could still press charges, right? Also, if he doesn't settle and the criminal investigation doesn't lead to charges that could probably help his case.

Post #10 » by **moocow007** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:11 pm

What's the league policy for a team paying off the plaintiff in this case?

Post #11 » by **Capn'O** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:27 pm

King of Canada wrote:We saw this coming a mile away. Not to suggest it doesn't warrant an investigation, but the timing is clearly to avoid the accuser's name being released. It's no coincidence that this is coming out on media day either.

This business with the name is pretty inexplicable by the defense. It looks worse for them (ethically) plus would obviously lead to escalation in response. If there's a method to their madness, I'm not yet seeing it.

ChilledAlex · Post #12 » by **ChilledAlex** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:29 pm

God damn the greed with this one, she already is embarassing herself why dive into even more hate?

Post #13 » by **AshyLarrysDiaper** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:39 pm

Jay10 wrote:This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.

LAPD made this info available today. Why would they want to help the plaintiff's civil case?

Dkillanyk4lyf · Post #14 » by **Dkillanyk4lyf** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:39 pm

This is crazy man.

trophywinner · Post #15 » by **trophywinner** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:44 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
Jay10 wrote:This could've been released on a Friday, but it being released on a Monday(will get an entire week of coverage), and especially Knicks media day says this is being done purposely to put pressure on Rose.

LAPD made this info available today. Why would they want to help the plaintiff's civil case?

no they didn't. they made this available weeks ago. the accuser's lawyers had been threatening rose with this for some time now.

another thing, look at the date on the letter, 9/22/16. that was last thursday. today is monday 9/26/16. also knick's media day. they had been holding onto this for this very day.

Dkillanyk4lyf · Post #16 » by **Dkillanyk4lyf** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:45 pm

Honestly have we ever seen a dumber athlete than drose??

gavran · Post #17 » by **gavran** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:53 pm

Why can a woman accuse a man of rape and be anonymus at the same time? Either both are anonymus, or neither. If the accusation turns out fake, Rose's reputation is gone, while she faces no scrutiny? Doesn't seem to equal to me.

delvec19 · Post #18 » by **delvec19** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:19 pm

Sooo Brandon Jennings opening night starter?

Carl_Karlson · Post #19 » by **Carl_Karlson** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:21 pm

In the big picture, this doesn't matter. Rose is only with us for 1 year any way

Post #20 » by **NoLayupRule** » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:24 pm

im not trying to minimize this but the simple fact is that Rose is innocent until proven guilty

this is out of our hands and is just a distraction unless it reaches a criminal conviction
which of course it won't
because the super rich don't go to jail 99.9% of the time
this will be negotiated out as they always are

but the thing we should remember is that he's not been found guilty, we don't know what happened, he doesn't seem to have a history of this kind of thing, and his private life isn't much of our concern anyway. We want him focused and successful in NYC, thats all