ImageImageImageImageImage

Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#181 » by trophywinner » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:10 pm

Flopper wrote:
trophywinner wrote:
madvillian wrote:You know how sometimes you'll put something off or just not get around to doing something and then it completely comes back to bite you in the ass? This is basically what seems to have happened with Rose. If he had bought her a few things and maintained the obvious "quid pro quo" agreement with this woman she never would have taken it this far.

She's obviously money hungry and Rose is obviously a freaking moron that isn't apparently that street smart either. As I keep saying both of them look like complete idiots. She's a money and fame hungry call girl basically and Derrick has the IQ of a tree stump.


lol, rose didn't owe her anything. there was no agreement. she was a side-chick and he treated her as such. maybe rose isn't the one who has some catching up to do.

If you treat people like ****, you shouldn't be surprised when they eventually return the favor. Even if the accusations are 100% false, Derrick has no one but himself to blame for this mess.


ummm but he didn't treat her like ****? he bought her a laptop, flew her places, invited her to his LA parties. he gave her a taste of his life. if you read her summary of their relationship, she makes it very clear that rose was always great to her, and it's even printed in court documents where the accuser states that she had hopes of him proposing because she "would've married rose".


Flopper wrote:Even if the accusations are 100% false, Derrick has no one but himself to blame for this mess


lol bro what? nope, no one is deserving of these kinds of accusations if they are false. and it's a shame false rape accusations go unpunished.
User avatar
nykfan42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,346
And1: 3,150
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: long island

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#182 » by nykfan42 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:38 pm

Where's the pic of the chick with Earl? My friends were asking me for it but i can't find it in any of the threads.
Make the Knicks great again!
User avatar
Flopper
Veteran
Posts: 2,544
And1: 2,507
Joined: Jun 05, 2010
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#183 » by Flopper » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:46 pm

trophywinner wrote:
Flopper wrote:
trophywinner wrote:
lol, rose didn't owe her anything. there was no agreement. she was a side-chick and he treated her as such. maybe rose isn't the one who has some catching up to do.

If you treat people like ****, you shouldn't be surprised when they eventually return the favor. Even if the accusations are 100% false, Derrick has no one but himself to blame for this mess.


ummm but he didn't treat her like ****? he bought her a laptop, flew her places, invited her to his LA parties. he gave her a taste of his life. if you read her summary of their relationship, she makes it very clear that rose was always great to her, and it's even printed in court documents where the accuser states that she had hopes of him proposing because she "would've married rose".


Flopper wrote:Even if the accusations are 100% false, Derrick has no one but himself to blame for this mess


lol bro what? nope, no one is deserving of these kinds of accusations if they are false. and it's a shame false rape accusations go unpunished.


Please tell me where I used the word "deserved". My point is that he made poor decisions that put him in a position where someone felt they had the leverage to exploit him. I'm a fan of Derrick the player and wish him the best on the court, but making all these excuses and calling him a victim is some of the dumbest **** I've ever seen on RealGM. He played with fire by having an extended relationship with a women who makes a hobby out of screwing NBA players and he's now paying the price. Bad things happens when you associate yourself with bad people.
User avatar
Riot Randolph
RealGM
Posts: 11,010
And1: 9,590
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#184 » by Riot Randolph » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:46 pm

Juggynaut wrote:Lol Flopper sounds like 1 of those crazy feminists, making excuses for her even if she filed false charges? Stop being such a cuck bro.

Female empowerment does not mean blind support ....
Formerly Knicks85

Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#185 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:52 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
trophywinner wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:
LAPD made this info available today. Why would they want to help the plaintiff's civil case?


no they didn't. they made this available weeks ago. the accuser's lawyers had been threatening rose with this for some time now.

another thing, look at the date on the letter, 9/22/16. that was last thursday. today is monday 9/26/16. also knick's media day. they had been holding onto this for this very day.


It's a violation of the Attorney Rules of Professional Responsibility to use the threat of filing a criminal proceeding in order to settle a civil case.


http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/fed-judge-derrick-rose-rape-case-orders-bickering-article-1.2811948

Judge Michael Fitzgerald issued a temporary gag order barring all parties from making public statements that bash anyone related to the case, discussing testimony or revealing evidence not admissible at trial.

"I am really fed up with both of you," Fitzgerald said to the lawyers on opposing sides of the courtroom.

He said it was "particularly egregious" and "borderline unethical" that Rose’s accuser's lawyers filed paperwork earlier this week that revealed a letter from the Los Angeles Police Department confirmed a criminal investigation of Rose for the alleged sexual assault.

"That was absolutely calculated to obtain a settlement in the case," the judge said, claiming Knicks President Phil Jackson and Rose's business partners were the intended target audience for the information.
User avatar
Riot Randolph
RealGM
Posts: 11,010
And1: 9,590
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#186 » by Riot Randolph » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:32 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
trophywinner wrote:
no they didn't. they made this available weeks ago. the accuser's lawyers had been threatening rose with this for some time now.

another thing, look at the date on the letter, 9/22/16. that was last thursday. today is monday 9/26/16. also knick's media day. they had been holding onto this for this very day.


It's a violation of the Attorney Rules of Professional Responsibility to use the threat of filing a criminal proceeding in order to settle a civil case.


http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/fed-judge-derrick-rose-rape-case-orders-bickering-article-1.2811948

Judge Michael Fitzgerald issued a temporary gag order barring all parties from making public statements that bash anyone related to the case, discussing testimony or revealing evidence not admissible at trial.

"I am really fed up with both of you," Fitzgerald said to the lawyers on opposing sides of the courtroom.

He said it was "particularly egregious" and "borderline unethical" that Rose’s accuser's lawyers filed paperwork earlier this week that revealed a letter from the Los Angeles Police Department confirmed a criminal investigation of Rose for the alleged sexual assault.

"That was absolutely calculated to obtain a settlement in the case," the judge said, claiming Knicks President Phil Jackson and Rose's business partners were the intended target audience for the information.

Judge looks at accusers team "I'm disgusted by you're borderline unethical practices" looks at defendants team "and you im displeased with your ineptitude "
Formerly Knicks85

Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Bill Pidto
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,912
And1: 7,531
Joined: Aug 18, 2013

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#187 » by Bill Pidto » Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:47 pm

Sounds like this judge is a Knicks fan. Let's wrap this thing up...
User avatar
br7knicks
RealGM
Posts: 34,739
And1: 10,644
Joined: Dec 01, 2008
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#188 » by br7knicks » Sat Oct 1, 2016 11:48 am

RIP, magnumt '19

PG: M Smart/E Bledsoe/I Smith
SG: D Russell/C LeVert/L Stephenson
SF: H Barnes/T Horton Tucker/
PF: T Harris/C Boucher/B Griffin/
C: J Valanciunas/J McGee/
NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#189 » by NYKAL » Sat Oct 1, 2016 12:48 pm

as long as he's not convicted in a criminal case, then like Kobe, all he has to do is WIN.
User avatar
ZeroStatic2
Senior
Posts: 594
And1: 229
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: Long Island
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#190 » by ZeroStatic2 » Sat Oct 1, 2016 12:56 pm

ImageImageImage
postcall
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,548
And1: 538
Joined: Apr 14, 2012

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#191 » by postcall » Sat Oct 1, 2016 4:29 pm

I mean it takes 5 seconds to find out who it was anyway. The internet everyone.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,459
And1: 27,145
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#192 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sat Oct 1, 2016 11:35 pm

br7knicks wrote:i didn't read the whole thing, and not sure how relevant this is, but:

https://thinkprogress.org/the-big-lie-about-the-woman-accusing-derrick-rose-of-gang-rape-b6929a7c05f6#.ktraci6ch


It doesn't explain away the direct statements that she made about Doe saying she wasn't raped. So it really doesn't help her case IMO.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
don't panac
Analyst
Posts: 3,020
And1: 664
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
         

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#193 » by don't panac » Sat Oct 1, 2016 11:51 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:
br7knicks wrote:i didn't read the whole thing, and not sure how relevant this is, but:

https://thinkprogress.org/the-big-lie-about-the-woman-accusing-derrick-rose-of-gang-rape-b6929a7c05f6#.ktraci6ch


It doesn't explain away the direct statements that she made about Doe saying she wasn't raped. So it really doesn't help her case IMO.


well, it does,
because half of the case she is just a gold-digger is built on those texts and on the word of her "friend".
now this new evidence clearly shows that these text don't refer to the rose case, and that she has been trying to screw her over and was in league with rose's lawyer. which completely undermines anything else she has to say on the case.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,459
And1: 27,145
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#194 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 2, 2016 12:24 am

don't panac wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
br7knicks wrote:i didn't read the whole thing, and not sure how relevant this is, but:

https://thinkprogress.org/the-big-lie-about-the-woman-accusing-derrick-rose-of-gang-rape-b6929a7c05f6#.ktraci6ch


It doesn't explain away the direct statements that she made about Doe saying she wasn't raped. So it really doesn't help her case IMO.


well, it does,
because half of the case she is just a gold-digger is built on those texts and on the word of her "friend".
now this new evidence clearly shows that these text don't refer to the rose case, and that she has been trying to screw her over and was in league with rose's lawyer. which completely undermines anything else she has to say on the case.


Fair point. I am not sure what to believe and I hope we don't have a rapist on the team. I just want to watch some damn basketball.
:beer: RIP mags
Keller61
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 5,041
Joined: Feb 12, 2013

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#195 » by Keller61 » Sun Oct 2, 2016 1:02 am

don't panac wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
br7knicks wrote:i didn't read the whole thing, and not sure how relevant this is, but:

https://thinkprogress.org/the-big-lie-about-the-woman-accusing-derrick-rose-of-gang-rape-b6929a7c05f6#.ktraci6ch


It doesn't explain away the direct statements that she made about Doe saying she wasn't raped. So it really doesn't help her case IMO.


well, it does,
because half of the case she is just a gold-digger is built on those texts and on the word of her "friend".
now this new evidence clearly shows that these text don't refer to the rose case, and that she has been trying to screw her over and was in league with rose's lawyer. which completely undermines anything else she has to say on the case.


Some of the texts (which were left out of that article) were clearly referring to the Rose case:

“Ok lets keep it at 90 then thats 6 months. Lol and i can even pay the whole couch off around xmas my dad gives me money not presents for xmas every year. then u just give me payment and since we finally filed against derrick we soon will be will be returning his tv and ill get us a Plasma.”


But anyway, the "friend" who released those texts (Keyana LaVergne) isn't the one who said that Doe told her she wasn't raped (Gabriela Chavez), so this doesn't affect Rose's best evidence.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,459
And1: 27,145
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#196 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 2, 2016 1:27 am

Keller61 wrote:
don't panac wrote:
Are We Ther Yet wrote:
It doesn't explain away the direct statements that she made about Doe saying she wasn't raped. So it really doesn't help her case IMO.


well, it does,
because half of the case she is just a gold-digger is built on those texts and on the word of her "friend".
now this new evidence clearly shows that these text don't refer to the rose case, and that she has been trying to screw her over and was in league with rose's lawyer. which completely undermines anything else she has to say on the case.


Some of the texts (which were left out of that article) were clearly referring to the Rose case:

“Ok lets keep it at 90 then thats 6 months. Lol and i can even pay the whole couch off around xmas my dad gives me money not presents for xmas every year. then u just give me payment and since we finally filed against derrick we soon will be will be returning his tv and ill get us a Plasma.”


But anyway, the "friend" who released those texts (Keyana LaVergne) isn't the one who said that Doe told her she wasn't raped (Gabriela Chavez), so this doesn't affect Rose's best evidence.


So there are two "friends" testifying? I thought it was just the one. So no matter what this amounts to....the second testimony really matters most.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
JXL
RealGM
Posts: 10,046
And1: 10,405
Joined: Sep 01, 2013
Location: New York
Contact:
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#197 » by JXL » Mon Oct 3, 2016 3:02 pm

It seems Rose's lawyers are dragging this out until later today, but the accuser's lawyers wants Rose to settle it outside of court. Are they afraid this will go to trial, or are they becoming more confident that if this goes to trial, Rose will get grilled?
BIRD UP!
#OGKENOBI


Follow me on Bluesky: @sirjxl.bsky.social
Rotten Apple
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2016
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#198 » by Rotten Apple » Mon Oct 3, 2016 3:17 pm

Bill Pidto wrote:Sounds like this judge is a Knicks fan. Let's wrap this thing up...


He's definitely a Knicks fan.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,278
And1: 68,043
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#199 » by F N 11 » Mon Oct 3, 2016 3:43 pm

I hope some hug news comes out and she loses. Rose seems way too confident that he's innocent. Im sure he has some of the best lawyers.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#200 » by trophywinner » Mon Oct 3, 2016 4:56 pm

Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter

Return to New York Knicks