ImageImageImageImageImage

Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,828
And1: 25,127
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#381 » by E-Balla » Fri Oct 7, 2016 1:44 pm

madvillian wrote:Thing is, if she says "yes, I told him to stop": it immediately puts her earlier statements regarding her level of intoxication into question, eg, "How can you recall so clearly this moment when earlier you testified ___________".

It's an obvious but well executed line of questioning by Rose's team.

Honestly I feel bad for her and Rose. Two star crossed people.

Is star crossed people meaning idiots in this context? I've already said I think both were a little wrong but if there's one thing I can say in this case its that these are 2 pretty dumb people.
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,594
And1: 30,792
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#382 » by Jeff Van Gully » Fri Oct 7, 2016 1:47 pm

Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
BKlutch wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I'll be surprised if rose loses this case at this point

She can't recall if she asked him to stop? Can't she even lie now and say she told him to stop? No is No, but if she didn't say no, after all those inviting texts we saw, how is this non-consensual?


Isn't the whole basis of her argument that she was too drunk/drugged to consent, her answers are in line with her story. I have no clue whether he did it or not, but let's hold off on painting her as some lying money grabbing scam artists, Rose's own words put him in an extremely bad light.


yep.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,828
And1: 25,127
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Rose may face Criminal Chargesi Don 

Post#383 » by E-Balla » Fri Oct 7, 2016 1:49 pm

boomann21 wrote:
Rotten Apple wrote:Rose crazy for that :lol: and its not against the law to celebrate in the court room nor can the jury hold that against the defense


Actually when I went to court and won custody of my son, the judge looked me dead in the eye and said there will be no celebrating in my court room. Dont know about Civil court, but they frown on fist pumps and wild facial expressions when one is winning in family court.

I don't think it was a celebration celebration but a huddle between a group of clients and lawyer. Remember this is a NYP reporter calling it this. Huddles are pretty common from what I've seen in documentaries.
User avatar
Red Vines
RealGM
Posts: 34,876
And1: 10,238
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#384 » by Red Vines » Fri Oct 7, 2016 1:55 pm

I'm so ready to rebuild with KP and Billy in the post-SUPERTEAM era. This whole thing is stinking.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,242
And1: 68,005
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#385 » by F N 11 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:03 pm

WOW shorty asking for X? Nah Bro She definitely losing this one. lol
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,242
And1: 68,005
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#386 » by F N 11 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:04 pm

Red Vines wrote:I'm so ready to rebuild with KP and Billy in the post-SUPERTEAM era. This whole thing is stinking.

Stop!!!!! We saw flashes of how much better this team can be with guards. Relax jeez. You will see the value of star players in big games. Relax.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,242
And1: 68,005
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#387 » by F N 11 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:09 pm

8/27/2013 07:49:38 AM Plaintiff to Mr. Rose: “Im hangover, didn’t make
it to work, and kendra is blowing my phone up. U never payed me back
or even payed for Kendras Taxi.” (ECF # 71-2 at 86).


Seems coherent to me!!! She said she was embarrassed but was asking for her money back a few hours after the alleged rape. Man shes cooked.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,242
And1: 68,005
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#388 » by F N 11 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:14 pm

Ms Doe has no contemporaneous mental examination evidence to support her emotional distress
claims. Instead, photographs posted on social media show Ms. Doe was partying in Las
Vegas two weeks after she claims she was raped.


Damnnnnnnnnn
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#389 » by trophywinner » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:36 pm

Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
BKlutch wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I'll be surprised if rose loses this case at this point

She can't recall if she asked him to stop? Can't she even lie now and say she told him to stop? No is No, but if she didn't say no, after all those inviting texts we saw, how is this non-consensual?


Isn't the whole basis of her argument that she was too drunk/drugged to consent, her answers are in line with her story. I have no clue whether he did it or not, but let's hold off on painting her as some lying money grabbing scam artists, Rose's own words put him in an extremely bad light.


but she can recall to detail rose pulling her to the edge of her bed and busting nuts? convenient.

Read on Twitter


rose's own words just make him seem dumb, not that he did it. he may not know what consent means, but i'm sure he understands "no". and she is a liar. already admitted to lying multiple times yesterday.
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,746
And1: 7,965
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#390 » by Adelheid » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:51 pm

Rose may be lecherous, but this woman really doesnt seem believable either.
User avatar
StephNYKurry
General Manager
Posts: 7,669
And1: 2,198
Joined: May 11, 2011

Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#391 » by StephNYKurry » Fri Oct 7, 2016 2:53 pm

knicks85 wrote:
StephNYKurry wrote:Just a lot of people in this thread waxing poetic who aren't the slightest bit familiar with group sex activity or any understanding of how some people choose to live their lives.

Just because this overblown super left and liberal feminist crap is running rampant, don't let it confuse you from the fact that there are vindictive, scheming, and conniving women in this world. Women are not immune to being of a questionable character. You simply shouldn't be ASSUMED to be of a lesser character because you ARE a woman, but you should still be held accountable for your behavior and reputation. The same way a man should be held accountable for his.

How's that for "feminism?"

i dont think you know what feminism's is...it is not the blind condoning of all females behavior; inversely it is looking for equal treatment...while i agree this rose case is a cash grab to label this as a by product of feminism is just showing your ignorance...


You didn't comprehend the entirety of the post. My problem isn't with "feminists." My problem is with those who don't understand "feminism" and those who use it as a crutch for any and everything they deem fit.

In the same ways that females used to be demonized for coming forward with confessions of rape, males are beginning to be unjustly demonized before they see their day in court because people have become extremely jaded in their views on sexual misconduct.

All those articles bashing Rose's defense team for wanting to call in to question "Miss Doe's" character were weak as hell and a lot of those people would claim to be "liberal" at best and "feminists" at worst. Character, reputation, and past behavior are CRITICAL in these types of cases. If they weren't, then any two dollar tramp could get rich.

Rape is a serious allegation and women who falsely accuse need to be weeded out with the quickness. All it does is make it worse for women who ACTUALLY have the misfortune of experiencing rape and I know that from dating women who have been raped.

Yeah, watch who you callin ignorant homie. I know the plight of the African American female in this country, being that I grew surrounded by them. Women have been treated like crap since before time, but that don't mean they shouldn't be held accountable either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do I care...it's rigged anyway
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#392 » by NoLayupRule » Fri Oct 7, 2016 3:54 pm

when did this supposedly go down?

how many years ago?
Dkillanyk4lyf
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,677
And1: 1,625
Joined: Jul 05, 2013

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#393 » by Dkillanyk4lyf » Fri Oct 7, 2016 4:01 pm

NoLayupRule wrote:when did this supposedly go down?

how many years ago?


2013 supposedly.
coopnyc74
Pro Prospect
Posts: 769
And1: 451
Joined: Jun 09, 2015
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#394 » by coopnyc74 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 4:25 pm

If you are Rose's defense team no way you put him on the stand.
trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#395 » by trophywinner » Fri Oct 7, 2016 4:36 pm

NoLayupRule wrote:when did this supposedly go down?

how many years ago?


summer 2013. civil statute of limitations in cali is 2 years, she filed one day before it was up.

rose was on time today
Read on Twitter
Swoosh_Stripes
Pro Prospect
Posts: 924
And1: 238
Joined: Oct 24, 2015
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#396 » by Swoosh_Stripes » Fri Oct 7, 2016 5:35 pm

trophywinner wrote:
Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
BKlutch wrote:She can't recall if she asked him to stop? Can't she even lie now and say she told him to stop? No is No, but if she didn't say no, after all those inviting texts we saw, how is this non-consensual?


Isn't the whole basis of her argument that she was too drunk/drugged to consent, her answers are in line with her story. I have no clue whether he did it or not, but let's hold off on painting her as some lying money grabbing scam artists, Rose's own words put him in an extremely bad light.


but she can recall to detail rose pulling her to the edge of her bed and busting nuts? convenient.

Read on Twitter


rose's own words just make him seem dumb, not that he did it. he may not know what consent means, but i'm sure he understands "no". and she is a liar. already admitted to lying multiple times yesterday.


Remembering something that could have been physically traumatic is not the same as remembering a conversation. The most basic human instinct is pain, so it is very likely that someone can be so drunk that they can't consent and still remember a traumatic physical experience.

Whether Rose raped her or not, I have no clue and neither do you or any other of the folks calling this girl all these bad names. By Rose's own account his actions are not exactly kosher, he does not seem to understand what it means to give consent. Also keep in mind that she is not exactly saying that Rose raped her and by all accounts she was alright with having sex with Rose, the basis of her argument is that she did not consent to have groupsex with Rose and his friends, that is supported with texts as well.
trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#397 » by trophywinner » Fri Oct 7, 2016 5:54 pm

Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
Remembering something that could have been physically traumatic is not the same as remembering a conversation. The most basic human instinct is pain, so it is very likely that someone can be so drunk that they can't consent and still remember a traumatic physical experience.

Whether Rose raped her or not, I have no clue and neither do you or any other of the folks calling this girl all these bad names. By Rose's own account his actions are not exactly kosher, he does not seem to understand what it means to give consent. Also keep in mind that she is not exactly saying that Rose raped her and by all accounts she was alright with having sex with Rose, the basis of her argument is that she did not consent to have groupsex with Rose and his friends, that is supported with texts as well.


but, she is saying rose raped her, along with his friends. that's what this whole thing is over, rape.

rose's actions are that of any pro athlete/celebrity. nothing wrong, normal.

and show me the texts that support her claims that she did not consent to groupsex that night. from rose's and co defs accounts, they all had sex earlier that night too.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,242
And1: 68,005
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#398 » by F N 11 » Fri Oct 7, 2016 5:55 pm

Rose gotta have top lawyers waiting to destroy her in this case. Im sure of it.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
trophywinner
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 353
Joined: Feb 23, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#399 » by trophywinner » Fri Oct 7, 2016 5:58 pm

K P 6 wrote:Rose gotta have top lawyers waiting to destroy her in this case. Im sure of it.


these guys are savages

Read on Twitter


^^***important note before everyone flips a chit on rose, this is the co-defs lawyer who said that.


Read on Twitter
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#400 » by CJackson » Fri Oct 7, 2016 6:07 pm

and that makes it better?

Rose's counsel sounds flippant. If a reporter can overhear you saying that kind of stuff then maybe they shouldn't be practicing law

Return to New York Knicks