Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
E-Balla wrote:Sark wrote:trophywinner wrote:
credibility, m8. c-r-e-d-i-b-i-l-i-t-y. that may not matter to you. but it speaks volumes in court, especially in a case where there's nothing proving that the plaintiff was raped/evidence incriminating the defendant.
And what of Rose's credibility? He doesn't even know what the meaning of the word "consent".
How does that make him not credible?
CJackson wrote:Sark wrote:trophywinner wrote:
credibility, m8. c-r-e-d-i-b-i-l-i-t-y. that may not matter to you. but it speaks volumes in court, especially in a case where there's nothing proving that the plaintiff was raped/evidence incriminating the defendant.
And what of Rose's credibility? He doesn't even know what the meaning of the word "consent".
What? Rose being stupid doesn't have anything to do with the point that the woman has repeatedly contradicted herself
MaseInYourFace wrote:nykfan42 wrote:After reading those texts how can you believe anything this chick says? She may be a good actor but she was not raped. She wants a payout no matter how you slice it. She's asking for ectsacy and going to the sex toy store with another chick and she claims to be raped? She's obviously a sexual savage that doesn't deserve a dime because she wasn't raped at all. She just does drugs and gets wasted while looking for money from athletes.
Sexual savage made me lol
Sark wrote:E-Balla wrote:Sark wrote:
And what of Rose's credibility? He doesn't even know what the meaning of the word "consent".
How does that make him not credible?
How would he know if he had consent if he doesn't even know what it is?
Sark wrote:CJackson wrote:Sark wrote:
And what of Rose's credibility? He doesn't even know what the meaning of the word "consent".
What? Rose being stupid doesn't have anything to do with the point that the woman has repeatedly contradicted herself
Stupidity is not an excuse for committing a crime.
Thugger HBC wrote:The jurors and court room officials have got to be getting a kick out this case.
nykfan42 wrote:What's this chick look like? I know someone posted a picture of her with JR Smith. Where is it?
CJackson wrote:Sark wrote:CJackson wrote:
What? Rose being stupid doesn't have anything to do with the point that the woman has repeatedly contradicted herself
Stupidity is not an excuse for committing a crime.
You're all over the place and you're responding to people without any relevancy
Sark wrote:CJackson wrote:Sark wrote:
Stupidity is not an excuse for committing a crime.
You're all over the place and you're responding to people without any relevancy
No I'm not. I'm saying her relationships with other people, or her past sexual behavior does not mean that she gave consent on the night in question.
Apples wrote:nykfan42 wrote:What's this chick look like? I know someone posted a picture of her with JR Smith. Where is it?
I'm not posting her picture but her name is apparently Monica LosRios. She supposedly deleted her Facebook page with all her pics but there are still a couple on the internet.
trophywinner wrote:Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
Remembering something that could have been physically traumatic is not the same as remembering a conversation. The most basic human instinct is pain, so it is very likely that someone can be so drunk that they can't consent and still remember a traumatic physical experience.
Whether Rose raped her or not, I have no clue and neither do you or any other of the folks calling this girl all these bad names. By Rose's own account his actions are not exactly kosher, he does not seem to understand what it means to give consent. Also keep in mind that she is not exactly saying that Rose raped her and by all accounts she was alright with having sex with Rose, the basis of her argument is that she did not consent to have groupsex with Rose and his friends, that is supported with texts as well.
but, she is saying rose raped her, along with his friends. that's what this whole thing is over, rape.
rose's actions are that of any pro athlete/celebrity. nothing wrong, normal.
and show me the texts that support her claims that she did not consent to groupsex that night. from rose's and co defs accounts, they all had sex earlier that night too.
Sark wrote:trophywinner wrote:nykfan42 wrote:After reading those texts how can you believe anything this chick says? She may be a good actor but she was not raped. She wants a payout no matter how you slice it. She's asking for ectsacy and going to the sex toy store with another chick and she claims to be raped? She's obviously a sexual savage that doesn't deserve a dime because she wasn't raped at all. She just does drugs and gets wasted while looking for money from athletes.
Hooked up with nick young knowing that he was engaged or whatever to iggy azalea
http://www.tmz.com/2016/09/12/derrick-rose-nick-young-rape-case/Rose's Jane Doe accuser claims she was traumatized by the alleged gang rape because she's "prudish" and sexually inexperienced. Rose's team says that's a big fat lie ... and they have a text referring to fellow NBA guard Nick Young to prove it.
According to docs obtained by TMZ Sports, the text was sent from Jane Doe to her roommate in November 2014. It says, "since u goin to nicks can u please tell him to give u my bra lol."
So because she hooked up with Nick Young, that means she consented to having Rose and his friend's run a train on her?
CJackson wrote:Does this mean when Brandon Jennings is blowing up it will be off-limits to say BJ is Unconscious?
AmazingJason wrote:Sark wrote:trophywinner wrote:
Hooked up with nick young knowing that he was engaged or whatever to iggy azalea
http://www.tmz.com/2016/09/12/derrick-rose-nick-young-rape-case/
So because she hooked up with Nick Young, that means she consented to having Rose and his friend's run a train on her?
No, but it certainly destroys whatever credibility she has.
Swoosh_Stripes wrote:
Texts from that night, we're limiting it to that now? How about the countless texts where she keeps stating that she's not comfortable with group sex and she only wants to be with him, I guess those don't matter.
As for Rose's actions being normal, please spare me, I know plenty of pro athletes, baseball to be exact (who are the most notorious cheaters in pro sports), not one of them has ever asked for a woman to let them run a train on them. But lets assume this is normal, when asked if she consented and you answer "she was coming to my place at 1AM she knew what was going to happen", that's a bad look and I doubt it plays well in a court.
