1UPZ wrote:MrMiyagi wrote:Magic_Johnny12 wrote:A rich mans JJ Redick
Which is a hell of a player, but not on par with the likes of Klay. His defense makes James harden look like Hakeem.
Not really, but it's pretty terrible.
I'm not sure if you've watched him play much, because he is so much more than "A rich mans JJ Redick" already at 19. It's kind of like saying Curry is a rich man's Steve Kerr because they have similar career FG, 3pt and FT percentages.
It depends how much respect you have for Redick's game. The guy was awesome last season and can slide to PG and SG.... Similar to Booker.
I made this comparison earlier this year and I know a few fellow Suns fans didnt like it..but I actually like Redick and I dont think my comparison was an insult to Booker.
Yes... At 19... Booker is a rich man's Redick in my book.. But if he continues to improve he can surpass that for sure.
Actually.. After watching Booker more closely.. He has that Michael Redd / Allan Houston element in his game too.. So a rich man's Redick with Redd/Houston elements is a star player either way.
I feel like Redick doesn't have a very diverse game, but he's probably the best at what he does. He runs off of screens and finds open spots on the floor better than just about anyone (not just from deep, but cutting to the basket as well), and although his defensive advance stats aren't great, he's a pest on D. I don't think he takes any breaks when he's on the floor. Maybe it's just that I've gotten use to him playing with CP3 that I think that's all he can do, but I don't really feel he "can slide to PG". I mean, if you watch his highlights, you see the same motions over and over and over. Yes when the designed motion doesn't work he's smart enough to pass or dribble out of it, but he's more of a playexecutor than a playmaker. I feel Booker's handle is much better and he knows how to use his body to create space (and this might be true of Redick, but he doesn't quite have the size to be as effective).
I mean, if Booker has an aspect to his game that Redick doesn't, is it really fair to say he's a "rich man's Redick"? Going back to Steph, don't we compare him to Nash more than Kerr? Both Nash and Kerr are among the NBA's best marksmen, but Nash was a world class playmaker. Kerr, not so much.
Booker is in more of the Brandon Roy, Ray Allen (in his Seattle days) vein.




































