lilfishi22 wrote:LukasBMW wrote:Watching the Archie Goodwin draft express video, it's amazing and sad to see that his shot really has not improved at all. It still is flat.
I totally agree that in today's NBA, you absolutely must be able to shoot and shoot consistently, otherwise you will never be able to cut it.
So at this point, we have to ask: Why has Archie's shot not improved? Is it a lack of attention on behalf of our coaching staff? Or is Archie too stubborn to make the effort to change it?
The scary thing is that with an improved shot, Archie becomes dangerous. I mean honestly, it could be another Hassan Whiteside situation where a player can't cut it, goes to the D-league, matures a bit and improves drastically, and then comes back and becomes a near allstar talent.
I still have hope.
If Archie had fixed his shot by year 2, he'd be a legit 15+ppg scorer off the bench. His ability to draw fouls is at an elite level but defenders gives his shot no respect so they just sag off him when he's out at the perimeter. As for why it hasn't improved...some players just have broken shots. It's kind of like guards who can't seem to shoot over 70-75% from the FT line. It's kind of a guard's job to be able to shoot FT's (although bigs should as well) and you'd expect them to put in hours in training working on it but some guards just can't seem to get it done in game. Archie's shot might just be broken. I'm positive he's put in work by himself, with trainers and even with Hornacek.
Yeah, some guys never become good shooters. I mean just because you have certain skills doesn't mean you should necessarily be capable of developing other skills that are completely different. I mean look at Rondo and Rubio. They have never really improved their shooting much.
You could say the same with many of the bigs and their free throws. If something doesn't happen within a couple years, I don't think it will. Most good shooters were good shooters in college.