Can Trump wiggle out of this one?

Post #341 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:29 am

Did a fly land on this woman's shirt?

Post #342 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:31 am

Jeffrey wrote:He wants to model another Judge like Scalia.... are you kidding me.

Law is not his wheelhouse. He had to say something safe, I suppose.

What's wrong with Scalia? I genuinely don't know.

Post #343 » by **Thugger HBC** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:33 am

KingDavid wrote:Did a fly land on this woman's shirt?

Yes, a fly finds Hilary attractive. :lol:

Post #344 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:34 am

That last question was gold.

CJackson · Post #345 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:38 am

That was such a poorly moderated event

Post #346 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:40 am

CJackson wrote:That was such a poorly moderated event

I don't know how the moderation could be improved short of yelling at the candidates.

The muting microphone suggestion seems to be the only way.

Jeffrey · Post #347 » by **Jeffrey** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:40 am

Watch on YouTube

And this is why the Republicans will tear each other apart. GOP Republicans who left Trump's ever sinking ship is now getting booed by their people. They really don't know what to do.

Oscirus · Post #348 » by **Oscirus** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:42 am

Hillary better be damned glad she's up against Trump because, wow.

Post #349 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:42 am

Thugger HBC wrote:
KingDavid wrote:Did a fly land on this woman's shirt?

Yes, a fly finds Hilary attractive.

Yeesh.

She has money though...

CJackson · Post #350 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:46 am

Words. Just Words. Don't know how someone can say that as their attempt at devaluing their opponent and then expect anything they say to be taken seriously. It is simply pathological.

Dantares · Post #351 » by **Dantares** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:51 am

So I’m also here to support Trump. I, at 12 years old, Hillary put me through something that you would never put a 12 year old through. And she says she’s for women and children. And she was asked last year on what happened and she says she’s supposed to defend whether they did it or not and now she’s laughing on tape saying she know they did it.”

did hillary really defend a rapist and then laugh about it on tape? I want to see proof, I don't believe it.

CJackson · Post #352 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:02 am

Dantares wrote:
So I’m also here to support Trump. I, at 12 years old, Hillary put me through something that you would never put a 12 year old through. And she says she’s for women and children. And she was asked last year on what happened and she says she’s supposed to defend whether they did it or not and now she’s laughing on tape saying she know they did it.”

did hillary really defend a rapist and then laugh about it on tape? I want to see proof, I don't believe it.

That whole accusation is just stupid.

You can find recordings of it on YouTube. This is what happened.

She was a lawyer. One of her cases was defending a guy accused of raping a 12 year old.

She said she had the guy take a polygraph. He passed the test. She said that she lost faith in polygraphs after that (THAT IS WHEN SHE LAUGHED)

So she did defend someone she evidently thought was guilty. It is a lawyer's oath to defend their clients so she did her job.

She did not laugh about the pain of the 12 year old. She laughed about what she perceived was the evident uselessness of the polygraph tests.

That is why this accusation about Clinton laughing about a kid being raped is stupid.

E-Balla · Post #353 » by **E-Balla** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:04 am

KingDavid wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:He wants to model another Judge like Scalia.... are you kidding me.

Law is not his wheelhouse. He had to say something safe, I suppose.

What's wrong with Scalia? I genuinely don't know.

He's an old racist homophobe. Scalia once said black students would benefit not going to top schools because they aren't able to mentally keep up.

Jeffrey · Post #354 » by **Jeffrey** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:10 am

E-Balla wrote:
KingDavid wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:He wants to model another Judge like Scalia.... are you kidding me.

Law is not his wheelhouse. He had to say something safe, I suppose.

What's wrong with Scalia? I genuinely don't know.

He's an old racist homophobe. Scalia once said black students would benefit not going to top schools because they aren't able to mentally keep up.

On Evolution

The body of scientific evidence supporting creation science is as strong as that supporting evolution. In fact, it may be stronger…. The evidence for evolution is far less compelling than we have been led to believe. Evolution is not a scientific “fact,” since it cannot actually be observed in a laboratory. Rather, evolution is merely a scientific theory or “guess.”… It is a very bad guess at that. The scientific problems with evolution are so serious that it could accurately be termed a “myth."

Dantares · Post #355 » by **Dantares** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:10 am

CJackson wrote:
Dantares wrote:
So I’m also here to support Trump. I, at 12 years old, Hillary put me through something that you would never put a 12 year old through. And she says she’s for women and children. And she was asked last year on what happened and she says she’s supposed to defend whether they did it or not and now she’s laughing on tape saying she know they did it.”

did hillary really defend a rapist and then laugh about it on tape? I want to see proof, I don't believe it.

That whole accusation is just stupid.

You can find recordings of it on YouTube. This is what happened.

She was a lawyer. One of her cases was defending a guy accused of raping a 12 year old.

She said she had the guy take a polygraph. He passed the test. She said that she lost faith in polygraphs after that (THAT IS WHEN SHE LAUGHED)

So she did defend someone she evidently thought was guilty. It is a lawyer's oath to defend their clients so she did her job.

She did not laugh about the pain of the 12 year old. She laughed about what she perceived was the evident uselessness of the polygraph tests.

That is why this accusation about Clinton laughing about a kid being raped is stupid.

oh ok, i figured it was a non issue

Post #356 » by **KingDavid** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:17 am

E-Balla wrote:
KingDavid wrote:
Jeffrey wrote:He wants to model another Judge like Scalia.... are you kidding me.

Law is not his wheelhouse. He had to say something safe, I suppose.

What's wrong with Scalia? I genuinely don't know.

He's an old racist homophobe. Scalia once said black students would benefit not going to top schools because they aren't able to mentally keep up.

What were Trump's people thinking? That's an awful nominee.

CJackson · Post #357 » by **CJackson** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:18 am

Dantares wrote:
CJackson wrote:
Dantares wrote:
did hillary really defend a rapist and then laugh about it on tape? I want to see proof, I don't believe it.

That whole accusation is just stupid.

You can find recordings of it on YouTube. This is what happened.

She was a lawyer. One of her cases was defending a guy accused of raping a 12 year old.

She said she had the guy take a polygraph. He passed the test. She said that she lost faith in polygraphs after that (THAT IS WHEN SHE LAUGHED)

So she did defend someone she evidently thought was guilty. It is a lawyer's oath to defend their clients so she did her job.

She did not laugh about the pain of the 12 year old. She laughed about what she perceived was the evident uselessness of the polygraph tests.

That is why this accusation about Clinton laughing about a kid being raped is stupid.

oh ok, i figured it was a non issue

It is the typical pablum doled out by organizations like Breitbart that people lazily repeat as if it is fact.

The Breitbart people today even ran this headline: Fact-Check: Yes, Hillary Clinton Did Laugh After Successfully Defending a Child Rapist. They are beyond scummy

Anyone with the brain of a hamster can go listen to it and immediately see it is a bold-faced lie.

That is what Clinton has dealt with all this time and I have some empathy for her having to deal with this level of trash logic for so long.

The TRUTH is she was very dedicated to children's rights from her early twenties and she is a legit advocate for kids

Anyway, she was assigned a case by a judge when she was 27 and she simply did what she had to do as a court assigned advocate. You don't become a trial lawyer without accepting the high probability you will be required to defend someone you find distasteful.

You can read actual reporting on it here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/09/why-donald-trump-just-attacked-hillary-clinton-for-defending-an-accused-child-rapist-explained/

bigtimeRC3 · Post #358 » by **bigtimeRC3** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:21 am

Fat Kat wrote:

Read on Twitter

politifact is a known left wing website. Do not be deceived by left wing propaganda that has plagued this nation the past decade.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8215/politifact-denies-its-own-left-wing-bias-robert-kraychik

HarthorneWingo · Post #359 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:25 am

bigtimeRC3 wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:

Read on Twitter

politifact is a known left wing website. Do not be deceived by left wing propaganda that has plagued this nation the past decade.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8215/politifact-denies-its-own-left-wing-bias-robert-kraychik

Known by whom?

AmazingJason · Post #360 » by **AmazingJason** » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:31 am

These are our candidates for the President of the US.

The modern day Frank and Claire Underwood. Bill and Hillary should be in jail.

And, well, Donald Trump. I don't need to make an analogy because he speaks for himself