For the first 3 games of the preseason here is his average.
8 pts, 42 FG%, 28.6 3pt%, 4.3 rbs, 3 asst, 23.7 mins.

Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ
goodboy wrote:Needs more touches.
orphicwhip wrote:goodboy wrote:Man I got the flu, still will watch my team play though.
McBob shares the same mentality.
Bishop45 wrote:Track and debate or scrutinize and criticize? From preseason numbers, seems like the latter
Guys are way too critical of a second year player (20 yr old), type of players y'all want him to be didn't develop until a few seasons were under their belt
IMO he's looked just fine outside of some low iq rookie mistakes here and there
twix2500 wrote:Bishop45 wrote:Track and debate or scrutinize and criticize? From preseason numbers, seems like the latter
Guys are way too critical of a second year player (20 yr old), type of players y'all want him to be didn't develop until a few seasons were under their belt
IMO he's looked just fine outside of some low iq rookie mistakes here and there
No one said anything negative yet. Regardless, he is forbidden to have criticism?
I haven't seen any games yet. So I have no idea why he is struggling thus far. I have a feeling, correct me if Im wrong, he may be too focus on trying to prove he can shoot threes instead of playing his game and letting his shot complement his game.
orphicwhip wrote:goodboy wrote:Man I got the flu, still will watch my team play though.
McBob shares the same mentality.
Bishop45 wrote:Track and debate or scrutinize and criticize? From preseason numbers, seems like the latter
Guys are way too critical of a second year player (20 yr old), type of players y'all want him to be didn't develop until a few seasons were under their belt
IMO he's looked just fine outside of some low iq rookie mistakes here and there
Bishop45 wrote:Track and debate or scrutinize and criticize? From preseason numbers, seems like the latter
Guys are way too critical of a second year player (20 yr old), type of players y'all want him to be didn't develop until a few seasons were under their belt
IMO he's looked just fine outside of some low iq rookie mistakes here and there
dancing2thabeet wrote:I hope you guys aren't expecting any significant improvement on the offensive side. Dude was abysmal last year and it's doubtful much has changed in a matter of few months. It's going to be at least a year, if not two, until we see him with a ball in his hands on a regular basis and as a finisher.
Keep that in mind and you won't be dissapointed. His defense is already miles ahead of 90% of wing players. Anything outside fastbreak points is just a bonus.
cyclix wrote:People are expecting him to be Kawhi, when he is more MKG, which is still a solid starter.
The ones that are criticizing his game are the same ones irritated by the Kawhi, Butler, PG13 comparisons he gets, and objectively see his potential more on MKG level.