CJackson wrote:No worries. I don't think you were misunderstood. We were probably just being overly particular.
For sure. I just think his thesis is terrifically important and don't want my mis-characterization of the author to overshadow it. I could quote the whole damn article but:
The only thing that could get in the way of real change – if not now, then surely very soon – was a rebellion so maladroit, ill-conceived and irresponsible that even the severest critics of the system would become zealots for the status quo.
That's **** brilliant, right there.
Also...
In the absolute best-case scenario, the one in which he loses...






















