MCW traded for Tony Snell - Deal Done

Post #1 » by **paulpressey25** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:20 am

More to come. Per Stein.

LittleRooster · Post #2 » by **LittleRooster** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:21 am

Yes please

Post #3 » by **ReasonablySober** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:22 am

Sure, whatever.

Magic Giannison · Post #4 » by **Magic Giannison** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:22 am

NO, **** SNELL, WTF NOOOOOOO

Baddy Chuck · Post #5 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:23 am

If that's his value......... :lol:

sure.

Badgerlander · Post #6 » by **Badgerlander** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:24 am

Gross

Badgerlander · Post #7 » by **Badgerlander** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am

So the tank is on then I guess

Post #8 » by **ReasonablySober** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am

Am I wrong in thinking the Bucks should be getting a pick in this deal? MCW is somehow much better than Snell.

tski1972 · Post #9 » by **tski1972** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am

ROY fetches potential top 5 pick, Bucks turn it into Tony Snell.

Baddy Chuck · Post #10 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am

Badgerlander wrote:So the tank is on then I guess

Trading MCW is about the farthest thing from tanking we could realistically do.

VooDoo7 · Post #11 » by **VooDoo7** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am

Can't expect much for MCW I guess. Well, except for the LAL 1st round pick.

LuessiT · Post #12 » by **LuessiT** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am

Yeah there has to be a pick involved in this. Anything else makes no sense.

Post #13 » by **GimmeDat** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:28 am

Is MCW really that bad these days?

As for Snell, he's a bit younger, he's long and a capable 3/D guy, but he lacks aggression and can often go invisible on offense. He has stretches where you think he might break out, but after this long, I think most people have given up on him being a big time difference maker.

He's very capable depth though.

I guess the Bulls must be liking his potential, because we already have a bunch of capable PG's, and we could really do without another non-shooting one.

randy84 · Post #14 » by **randy84** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am

Isn't Snell injured?

VooDoo7 · Post #15 » by **VooDoo7** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am

LuessiT wrote:Yeah there has to be a pick involved in this. Anything else makes no sense.

I'm sure WE'LL be the ones adding a 2nd round pick.

See, Vasquez trade.

Baddy Chuck · Post #16 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am

GimmeDat wrote:Is MCW really that bad these days?

Worse.

trwi7 · Post #17 » by **trwi7** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am

Do the Bulls have a future 2nd from the Lakers? I'd even include a protected 1st to get a future Lakers 2nd just for the lawlz.

Pachinko_ · Post #18 » by **Pachinko_** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am

I'd take a bag of chips and half a beer for MCW
add some dip and I'll throw in Vaughn too

Baddy Chuck · Post #19 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am

I could see us getting Jerian Grant out of the deal and Fotsis proclaiming himself king of the board.

Badgerlander · Post #20 » by **Badgerlander** » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Am I wrong in thinking the Bucks should be getting a pick in this deal? MCW is somehow much better than Snell.

I was thinking the same thing.