Post#222 » by thesack12 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 2:03 pm
Regarding the coaching staff, as already mentioned O'neil was not among the primary choices he was a "settle for" type of hiring. Much to the same capacity that Mangini and Chryst were last season. Again, its not hard to blame Baalke and the front office for this, as Frisco isn't considered a desirable situation. However, If the defense continues on its current path there shouldn't be any reason O'neil keeps his job (especially if Baalke is canned.) I get the idea of wanting to keep continiuty for a young defense, but if the current schemes/performance are awful it wouldn't be a good thing to waste another year in it. His defenses in Cleveland weren't any good either, so there isn't much hope about him getting it turned around.
It definitely seems as though Modkins hasn't provided much. His roots are in the run game, and outside of some nifty Hyde running and some nice runs by the QB's, I wouldn't call the running game good. Part of that is due to not so great run blocking, but some of that should fall on scheme because this year there is actually decent talent on the o-line. Also seems like there isn't too much diversity or imagination in the run game as far as different plays. As well all know the passing game is dreadful. In fairness, the lackluster WR's are getting open and QB play has been rotten. However, the good coaches are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their personnel and adapt the game planning to suit that. Modkins is more of a figurehead anyways, and everybody knows Chip is the guy when it comes to offense, so that coupled with the undesirable situation in Frisco probably means there weren't a lot of good candidates interested in the job.
As for Chip, he had one great year in Philly and got an all pro season out of Nick freakin Foles. Since then, it has been all downhill from there. We know how the Eagles thing turned out, so not much reason to dive into it. All the same things I said about Modkins, apply here, and then some. The play calling at times has been very predictable and not very diverse. Some NFL defensive players have said that Chip's system is definitely the easiest to prepare for. At other times its just been downright bad (I'll never know why Mike Davis got the call on back to back 3rd and 1 and 4th and 1 last week, or why he was even on the field anyways.) The pace of the offense has slowed down from his previous norm, although I don't know how much of this has to do his feelings on his system in general or trying to specialize it for his current personnel. The staff definitely seems to struggle to make halftime/in game adjustments. How many times has the game just spiraled completely out of control after the half leading to Frisco getting throttled?
As others have mentioned, its probably unfair to judge Kelly at this point because of the dearth of talent and the Baalke effect. We really don't know how much of the coaching hire decisions were influenced by Baalke, or just how much he meddles in everything else. I also agree that regardless of what happens, he will at least get a second season. All that said, Kelly was not a hot candidate this past offseason (after the initial interview it seemed like Frisco didn't even want him.) He has been on a downward trend for quite awhile. If the situation in Frisco brightens (read as Trent Baalke getting fired), can Chip right the ship and restore stock in his NFL career? Time will tell, but it wouldn't be the first time a quality HC struggled early in their careers then went elsewhere and thrived. Bill Belichick and Pete Carrol immediately come to mind.
There's also the chance that at any given time Chip says I'm done with the NFL and bolts for college, a la Nick Saban.