Can Trump wiggle out of this one?

CJackson · Post #1181 » by **CJackson** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:31 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
CJackson wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
10 states in addition to Utah: Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, South Carolina and Virginia.

Former CIA operative

What's the point of running if you're only on the ballots in 10 states? Is he an intelligent and reasonable person?

Former spook; 11 years on the ground in hostile operations, i.e. he was doing "counter-terrorism"

and

Goldman Sachs investment banker

Obviously not a progressive. Says he's a conservative. Hates Trump.

CJackson · Post #1182 » by **CJackson** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:32 pm

Mike Breen wrote:
ClydeRules wrote:IBD/TIPP poll which is the most accurate over the past few elections has Trump 41% Hillary 40%.

http://www.investors.com/politics/trump-leads-clinton-by-one-point-going-into-debate-in-ibdtipp-tracking-poll/

Honest question: Do you really believe the things you write?

That's like asking a beanie baby if they are full of beans

Post #1183 » by **GONYK** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:59 pm

CJackson wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
CJackson wrote:
Former CIA operative

What's the point of running if you're only on the ballots in 10 states? Is he an intelligent and reasonable person?

Former spook; 11 years on the ground in hostile operations, i.e. he was doing "counter-terrorism"

and

Goldman Sachs investment banker

Obviously not a progressive. Says he's a conservative. Hates Trump.

He's basically "Generic Republican"

CJackson · Post #1184 » by **CJackson** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:01 am

GONYK wrote:
CJackson wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
What's the point of running if you're only on the ballots in 10 states? Is he an intelligent and reasonable person?

Former spook; 11 years on the ground in hostile operations, i.e. he was doing "counter-terrorism"

and

Goldman Sachs investment banker

Obviously not a progressive. Says he's a conservative. Hates Trump.

He's basically "Generic Republican"

Into the void steps ................. a guy. Weeeeeee!

Amsterdam · Post #1185 » by **Amsterdam** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:50 am

Earlier, Gordon Duff, a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, wrote in his article for New Eastern Outlook that the 2016 US presidential campaign has hit a new low.

"The second presidential debate wasn't just an attack on reason itself, as most pundits agree, it laid bare America for what it is, a nation in decline, once believed the 'hope of the world,' now laid bare as simply 'nuts,'" Duff claimed. According to a recent survey, Trump and Clinton are the most unpopular presidential candidates in US history.

Post #1186 » by **GONYK** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:56 am

Amsterdam wrote:Earlier, Gordon Duff, a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, wrote in his article for New Eastern Outlook that the 2016 US presidential campaign has hit a new low.

"The second presidential debate wasn't just an attack on reason itself, as most pundits agree, it laid bare America for what it is, a nation in decline, once believed the 'hope of the world,' now laid bare as simply 'nuts,'" Duff claimed. According to a recent survey, Trump and Clinton are the most unpopular presidential candidates in US history.

The debate showed that the entire country is nuts?

That, I disagree with.

CJackson · Post #1187 » by **CJackson** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:03 am

GONYK wrote:
Amsterdam wrote:Earlier, Gordon Duff, a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, wrote in his article for New Eastern Outlook that the 2016 US presidential campaign has hit a new low.

"The second presidential debate wasn't just an attack on reason itself, as most pundits agree, it laid bare America for what it is, a nation in decline, once believed the 'hope of the world,' now laid bare as simply 'nuts,'" Duff claimed. According to a recent survey, Trump and Clinton are the most unpopular presidential candidates in US history.

The debate showed that the entire country is nuts?

That, I disagree with.

Yeah, if they are committed to combating the decline of reason in the U.S. they are not contributing anything by engaging in more of the anti-intellectual false reductionism of this election. These candidates are not the same nor indicative of the same issues or problems. Enough with this kind of sad excuse for analysis.

No offense Amsterdam, but the guy didn't say anything other than country in trouble, candidates bad when in fact the second debate was at the very least a pretty striking display in behavioral polarities with Trump rambling and stalking the stage like a drunk bear.

Post #1188 » by **GONYK** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:15 am

I don't understand why Trump thinks that bringing in "surprise guests" that are personally embarrassing to Bill and Obama (two people who aren't running, and who aren't debating him) will bother Hillary.

CJackson · Post #1189 » by **CJackson** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:19 am

GONYK wrote:I don't understand why Trump thinks that bringing in "surprise guests" that are personally embarrassing to Bill and Obama (two people who aren't running, and who aren't debating him) will bother Hillary.

his mind is a grey, dysfuntional blob wired for hustling up reality tv show ratings

Post #1190 » by **KingDavid** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:33 am

What in the hell is Trump talking about?

Trump is kind of defending Putin. Oh lord this bad.

Post #1191 » by **KingDavid** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:39 am

There's a need for a lot of fact checking tonight. What in the hell is this garbage. Stay on topic, please.

Post #1192 » by **KingDavid** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:40 am

Trump can't let the nukes go and talk about his economic plan. Christ.

CJackson · Post #1193 » by **CJackson** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:42 am

I'm still watching the game so I can only imagine what a smorgasbord of Trump turds await me

Post #1194 » by **KingDavid** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:53 am

"If I could run this country like I run my business, you would be proud"

WTF trump?

Amsterdam · Post #1195 » by **Amsterdam** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:05 am

Not for nothing but Clinton is getting defensively rocked in this debate. And that is sad for a transparent candidate.

That's why this candidacy is abysmal on both sides.

F N 11 · Post #1196 » by **F N 11** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:11 am

Trump is disgraceful omg

Amsterdam · Post #1197 » by **Amsterdam** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:12 am

CJackson wrote:I'm still watching the game so I can only imagine what a smorgasbord of Trump turds await me

You think to highly of your position..lol

CJackson · Post #1198 » by **CJackson** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:16 am

Amsterdam wrote:
CJackson wrote:I'm still watching the game so I can only imagine what a smorgasbord of Trump turds await me

You think to highly of your position bro...lol

This is meant to hurt my feelings? Are you that lame? Have you ever responded to anything with actual wit?

Again, here we go with your cowardly passive aggressive posts yet when I look past your snarky comments and offer up real discussion tailored for you based on your chosen subject of choice you crawl away into your hole and don't engage.

I answered you thoughtfully AGAIN last night and this is the first time you respond to me with another turd post.

You asked for content on the topic of your choosing and you didn't have the basic integrity to respond to actual discussion and here you are with this garbage so to hell with you man.

Post #1199 » by **K_ick_God** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:20 am

KingDavid wrote:What in the hell is Trump talking about?

Trump is kind of defending Putin. Oh lord this bad.

He always does.

F N 11 · Post #1200 » by **F N 11** » Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:22 am

He did say we giving money to rebels hmmmm