So how about Joel Embiid
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
- Hindenburg
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,426
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Feb 10, 2015
-
Not a bad first game but a lot of room for improvement for Embiid
Pros:
Looked very fluid and mobile out there
Good free throw shooting
Nice touch around the basket, quick feet
Cons
6-16 shooting... How did he even manage to hoist up 16 shots in 22 minutes?
4 fouls and 4 turnovers in 22 minutes
Didn't play a good defense on Adams
Pros:
Looked very fluid and mobile out there
Good free throw shooting
Nice touch around the basket, quick feet
Cons
6-16 shooting... How did he even manage to hoist up 16 shots in 22 minutes?
4 fouls and 4 turnovers in 22 minutes
Didn't play a good defense on Adams
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
eyeatoma
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,952
- And1: 13,205
- Joined: Feb 25, 2005
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
This is why I love this guy! Absolute confidence of a superstar! They're cut from the same cloth...
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
90sgoat
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,404
- And1: 401
- Joined: Aug 05, 2016
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
Embiid got a SWEET jumper. That's what I like most about this guy, he seemingly picks up perfect form on everything he does with no effort. Think how long it took Lebron to get something resembling a jumper. Dwight still doesn't have a legit postgame. Embiid seemingly just understands it right away and puts it to work. That is talent. His jumper looks like perfect for Ray Allen.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
MotownMadness
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,806
- And1: 22,856
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
eyeatoma wrote:This is why I love this guy! Absolute confidence of a superstar! They're cut from the same cloth...
I Think he just likes talking **** like Rasheed or something.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
- John Murdoch
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,264
- And1: 7,729
- Joined: Sep 16, 2013
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
his footwork is elite for a big but he needs to shed another 10lbs to reach his max fluidity imo awsome debut tho
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
reignfire
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,908
- And1: 864
- Joined: Aug 01, 2012
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
I'm a Wolves fan first and foremost, so KAT is my dude.
There's one thing this guy has over kAT that may put him over KAT: he's a better physical speciman. Bigger, stronger, just as fast, maybe more agile. Amazing.
KAT is def more of a sure thing right now tho.
There's one thing this guy has over kAT that may put him over KAT: he's a better physical speciman. Bigger, stronger, just as fast, maybe more agile. Amazing.
KAT is def more of a sure thing right now tho.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
Unbreakable99
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,752
- And1: 3,993
- Joined: Jul 04, 2014
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
Embiid was getting MVP chants in his first game. I wonder if any player in NBA history ever got MVP chants in his first game lol.
Re: RE: Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
BloodNinja
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,691
- And1: 5,769
- Joined: Mar 05, 2016
Re: RE: Re: So How about Joel Embiid
Unbreakable99 wrote:Embiid was getting MVP chants in his first game. I wonder if any player in NBA history ever got MVP chants in his first game lol.
Maybe MCW? lol
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
lrader
- Ballboy
- Posts: 28
- And1: 85
- Joined: Dec 10, 2014
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
I thought Embiid looked and moved great, but obviously showed some signs of playing his first competitive game in a few years.
He was overexcited and despite playing only 22 minutes, he had 4 turnovers, 4 fouls and a USG rate of 47.1%. I think he is forcing a bit because he knows he is on a minutes restriction and is trying to get his.
Regardless, I was shocked at how fluid he looked in the post against Adams in the fourth and his confidence is awesome to see in a young player.
He was overexcited and despite playing only 22 minutes, he had 4 turnovers, 4 fouls and a USG rate of 47.1%. I think he is forcing a bit because he knows he is on a minutes restriction and is trying to get his.
Regardless, I was shocked at how fluid he looked in the post against Adams in the fourth and his confidence is awesome to see in a young player.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
jbent87
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,670
- And1: 1,202
- Joined: Jul 02, 2015
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
reignfire wrote:I'm a Wolves fan first and foremost, so KAT is my dude.
There's one thing this guy has over kAT that may put him over KAT: he's a better physical speciman. Bigger, stronger, just as fast, maybe more agile. Amazing.
KAT is def more of a sure thing right now tho.
KAT is obviously phenomenal and not to throw shade at him by any means but Okafor had his way vs him last season. KAT is definitely gonna have his hands full with Embiid. vice versa obviously as well.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
jpengland
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,623
- And1: 6,961
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
lrader wrote:I thought Embiid looked and moved great, but obviously showed some signs of playing his first competitive game in a few years.
He was overexcited and despite playing only 22 minutes, he had 4 turnovers, 4 fouls and a USG rate of 47.1%. I think he is forcing a bit because he knows he is on a minutes restriction and is trying to get his.
Regardless, I was shocked at how fluid he looked in the post against Adams in the fourth and his confidence is awesome to see in a young player.
I think that it's more the sixers forcing it through him than Embiid.
They want him getting as much development as possible in his limited minutes. If he's only playing 20 mins, they need him touching the ball and working as hard as possible
Re:
-
trickshot
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,840
- And1: 7,542
- Joined: Feb 27, 2012
Re:
Hindenburg wrote:Not a bad first game but a lot of room for improvement for Embiid
Cons
6-16 shooting... How did he even manage to hoist up 16 shots in 22 minutes?
4 fouls and 4 turnovers in 22 minutes
Didn't play a good defense on Adams
Lots of room for improvement. He showed flashes of elite rim protection ability. Adams benefitted on some of his rookie errors like going to double westbrook and leaving Adams open under the basket. Played good D outside of that
Cant complain about his shooting either. He generated his buckets with his skillset. He doesn't look like one of those bigmen who are content to silently put up big numbers. Every minute he was out there he looked to make something happen. Signs of a guy that won't shrink in the playoffs. 6-16 shooting also included 1-3 from 3pt, several midrange shots and 7-8 from the line. Just stay healthy
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
- cksdayoff
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,331
- And1: 3,639
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
John Murdoch wrote:his footwork is elite for a big but he needs to shed another 10lbs to reach his max fluidity imo awsome debut tho
i agree, if he sheds a few more lbs, he'll be a little bit more nimble
#failforfultz
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
- cksdayoff
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,331
- And1: 3,639
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
lrader wrote:I thought Embiid looked and moved great, but obviously showed some signs of playing his first competitive game in a few years.
He was overexcited and despite playing only 22 minutes, he had 4 turnovers, 4 fouls and a USG rate of 47.1%. I think he is forcing a bit because he knows he is on a minutes restriction and is trying to get his.
That is completely fine, you have Embiid out there and literally, 4 scrubs (Okafor plays with the second unit) at all times. When the sixers bring the ball up the court, they need to feed Embiid every single time.
Last night, down the stretch, they didn't do that, especially since Embiid was in supreme confidence mode against Kanter and Adams. Sixers lost the game because they didn't feed their big man.
#failforfultz
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
- cksdayoff
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,331
- And1: 3,639
- Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
reignfire wrote:I'm a Wolves fan first and foremost, so KAT is my dude.
There's one thing this guy has over kAT that may put him over KAT: he's a better physical speciman. Bigger, stronger, just as fast, maybe more agile. Amazing.
KAT is def more of a sure thing right now tho.
KAT's more fluid, probably quicker too
#failforfultz
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
Pork N Chili
- Sophomore
- Posts: 123
- And1: 143
- Joined: Jul 02, 2015
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
Watching Embiid last night (while flipping channels to watch the Pistons & Drummond), I'm convinced Embiid is ALREADY one of the best centers in the league: not even talking about "He has a post game doe and Player X doesn't". YES, he has to continue to work on his game, but he already has such a unique feel for the game that can't just be taught. The sky is legitimately the limit for him, and I'm just happy to see he's finally getting the respect that he deserves.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
Magic24
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 851
- And1: 109
- Joined: May 23, 2010
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
DK-All Day wrote:Not quite buying the Hakeem comparisons. guys like that come along once. Embiid is special though. Hope he stays healthy as he's a joy to watch.
He showed the Hakeem type moves at Kansas, but this is just one game. We saw the Dream somewhat like fade away at the free throw line. It'll take time, but he will start to out finesse the stronger opponents.
I've been waiting 2 years for this guy. Glad he is finally here. I was a huge Dream fan, so it is exciting to see Embiid. I do agree that he should lose some weight to bring back some fluidity. As he gets more games under his belt and the feel returns, I think he will start to incorporate the pump fakes and counters.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
juju14
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 901
- And1: 420
- Joined: Oct 05, 2008
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
The thing about Embiid he hasn't had a offseason to really work on his game. Most of it is rehab. We won't see how great he will be until next year.
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
Ericb5
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,303
- And1: 3,377
- Joined: Jan 08, 2014
-
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
reignfire wrote:I'm a Wolves fan first and foremost, so KAT is my dude.
There's one thing this guy has over kAT that may put him over KAT: he's a better physical speciman. Bigger, stronger, just as fast, maybe more agile. Amazing.
KAT is def more of a sure thing right now tho.
KAT is ahead of him developmentally, and doesn't have the injury cloud. For those two reasons alone, KAT is the safer bet as a long term prospect.
However, I don think KAT is really a center. He is a 4, that can play some 5, but I would want him at the 4 long term. Embiid is MUCH bigger, as in 4-5 inches of reach bigger, and he is just as fast as KAT at the same time.
I think that KAT and AD will compete for who the premier 4 is in the league, and Embiid is in a different category.
Embiid is still rusty from the long layoff. I have watched every minute that he has played in the preseason up to now, and he is getting better mentally, and physically.
I'm not sure if he is going to average 20-10 this year due to the rust, and minutes restriction, but I think that from Christmas on he will do it.
He probably won't be an all star this year, but I bet that he will be better than the all star centers by the end of the season.
Just think how much more efficient he would be if he had Simmons out there setting him up. There is a lot of throwing it in to him and letting him work right now, but Simmons will probably get him 4-5 easy buckets a game once he gets back.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
-
OFWGKTA
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,014
- And1: 12,141
- Joined: May 20, 2011
Re: So How about Joel Embiid
Lock, use the rookie discussion thread.
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.


