Sophomore Impressions 2016-17

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

yitur
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,945
And1: 904
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
   

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#121 » by yitur » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:18 pm

ensergiog wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
ensergiog wrote:Is Myles Turner's environment better than Porzingis's? Or is Turner better NOW than him?

One plays for a 45 win team and the other for a 32 win team. Myles is definitely in a better environment.

Also its one game into the season. Calm down bro.


It's too early, I agree. But the discussion will be interesting during the season.

My hypothesis: Porzingis' upside is higher, but Turner is a little better in the game now. For example, Turner can play in the post right now better than Porzingis.


Exactly, I think Porzingis' ceiling is higher but I still like Turner better. He was the guy I wanted over anyone except Towns for the Lakers, but I'm happy with what we got. Still he is a special player and this 2015 draft will be the next best thing for sure. This thread should be more active.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#122 » by E-Balla » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:18 pm

ensergiog wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
ensergiog wrote:Is Myles Turner's environment better than Porzingis's? Or is Turner better NOW than him?

One plays for a 45 win team and the other for a 32 win team. Myles is definitely in a better environment.

Also its one game into the season. Calm down bro.


It's too early, I agree. But the discussion will be interesting during the season.

My hypothesis: Porzingis' upside is higher, but Turner is a little better in the game now. For example, Turner can play in the post right now better than Porzingis.

Porzingis was way better than Turner last year. I don't know how you came to this conclusion after one game...
yitur
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,945
And1: 904
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
   

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#123 » by yitur » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:23 pm















This one is the argued one but I am a Laker fan so yes Randle is a sophomore to me, 2nd full season and all.



ensergiog
Sophomore
Posts: 173
And1: 279
Joined: Jan 27, 2016
     

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#124 » by ensergiog » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:25 pm

E-Balla wrote:
ensergiog wrote:
E-Balla wrote:One plays for a 45 win team and the other for a 32 win team. Myles is definitely in a better environment.

Also its one game into the season. Calm down bro.


It's too early, I agree. But the discussion will be interesting during the season.

My hypothesis: Porzingis' upside is higher, but Turner is a little better in the game now. For example, Turner can play in the post right now better than Porzingis.

Porzingis was way better than Turner last year. I don't know how you came to this conclusion after one game...


Good point.
juju14
Pro Prospect
Posts: 901
And1: 420
Joined: Oct 05, 2008

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#125 » by juju14 » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:42 pm

Myles will end up being better then porz this year and probably the future. He just plays big in big moments.
User avatar
cyclix
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,247
And1: 4,636
Joined: Dec 05, 2013
       

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#126 » by cyclix » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:56 pm

yitur
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,945
And1: 904
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
   

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#127 » by yitur » Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:16 pm

cyclix wrote:


Damn, I forgot about Winslow. He is in the Kawhi-Butler mold, hope he improves like they did but maybe not like Kawhi levels, that would be scary.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 21,001
And1: 4,734
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#128 » by Hangtime84 » Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:47 pm

My fantasy team has Russell, Turner, PorzingGOD
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Lost Angel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,301
And1: 1,474
Joined: Dec 30, 2001

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#129 » by Lost Angel » Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:10 pm

Russell and Turner are going to show everyone they are for real.

wish Lakers had two picks that year to get both
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#130 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:23 pm

E-Balla wrote:Porzingis was way better than Turner last year.

I disagree with this, but whichever way we look at it, its going to be a bit of a grey area.

I think playing for a team like New York allowed Porzingis to have a lot more opportunities to shine. For one, Porzingis played in just about 6 more minutes per game than Turner and was featured a bit more in the offense. This is both good and bad because Porzingis only managed to shoot 42% to Turners 50%. Obviously you've got to factor in how much teammates can spread the floor and the fact that Porzingis took a lot more threes(though Turner took plenty of jump shots right inside the line), but as I said its all just a but of a grey area. I also think playing in NY helped Porzingis in terms of publicity. If Turner and Porzingis were to post identical stat lines, you'll see a 30 minute segment on how good Porzingis is from SC and a highlight or two from Turner. Not that one game matters, but in their only head-to-head matchup of the season, though it was close, I feel Turner got the better of Porzingis in the game. Only one game of course, but its the only head-to-head matchup we have to go on between the two. The other thing with Turner is that he plays big in big moments, you can find post from numerous Raptors fans talking about how big of a factor he was in the playoffs last year. He was our second best player behind PG as a rookie.

I'm not arguing that Turner had a better rookie season than Porzingis, I think valid cases could be made either way considering their circumstances are so different. But I don't think you can say Porzingis was "way better" either. Either way, these two players could reignite the Knicks vs Hicks rivalry and that would be fantastic.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#131 » by Slartibartfast » Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:36 pm

Pretty remarkable soph class - KAT, Porzingis, Turner looking like star bigs. Russell and Booker looking like star scorers. Winslow looking good as a star utility guy. Plenty of potential still for Johnson/Hezonja.

Okafor the biggest disappointment of the lotto guys, IMO. WCS and Kaminsky pretty much what people expected at the time.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#132 » by E-Balla » Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:55 pm

xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:
E-Balla wrote:Porzingis was way better than Turner last year.

I disagree with this, but whichever way we look at it, its going to be a bit of a grey area.

I think playing for a team like New York allowed Porzingis to have a lot more opportunities to shine. For one, Porzingis played in just about 6 more minutes per game than Turner and was featured a bit more in the offense.

Playing for a team like NY had nothing to do with the playing time difference. Being way better than Turner did. Porzingis by all measures was very impactful on the floor. His on/off was a +5.2. His on court net +/- per 100 was -0.3. Turner's on/off was a -6.0 and his on court net +/- was a -2.0. The reason Turner didn't play more was that the team was significantly better when he wasn't playing.

This is both good and bad because Porzingis only managed to shoot 42% to Turners 50%. Obviously you've got to factor in how much teammates can spread the floor and the fact that Porzingis took a lot more threes(though Turner took plenty of jump shots right inside the line), but as I said its all just a but of a grey area.

It really isn't. Porzingis had a 52 TS% and Turner a 53 TS%. They were about equally as efficient as each other when it came to scoring but one spaced the floor more and had way more volume.

I also think playing in NY helped Porzingis in terms of publicity. If Turner and Porzingis were to post identical stat lines, you'll see a 30 minute segment on how good Porzingis is from SC and a highlight or two from Turner. Not that one game matters, but in their only head-to-head matchup of the season, though it was close, I feel Turner got the better of Porzingis in the game. Only one game of course, but its the only head-to-head matchup we have to go on between the two. The other thing with Turner is that he plays big in big moments, you can find post from numerous Raptors fans talking about how big of a factor he was in the playoffs last year. He was our second best player behind PG as a rookie.

Next to Joe Young Myles had the lowest on/off on the Pacers by a distance. Statistically you guys did way better without him on the floor. Now this is to be expected from a rookie and he was still very impressive but that whole block of text is hogwash (outside of him outplaying Porzingis when he had one of his best games of the year vs NY).

I'm not arguing that Turner had a better rookie season than Porzingis, I think valid cases could be made either way considering their circumstances are so different. But I don't think you can say Porzingis was "way better" either. Either way, these two players could reignite the Knicks vs Hicks rivalry and that would be fantastic.

By all +/- based stats Porzingis was top 60 in the league and 2nd amount rookies (to Jokic). Myles was good but nowhere near that. It's cool to by hype about your rookie but trying to apply logic to it when statistically Myles is left in the dust and by eye test many think Porzingis kills him (there's a reason he's the Unicorn and not Myles even though Myles is big and can shoot)? Not really getting anywhere that way.

I think you guys got yourselves a nice player. Before the draft I had him in my top 5 when it came to upside. Didnt think he'd live up to it but he has so far. I just can't wait until we have 4 20/10 bigs from that draft all making noise.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#133 » by Alex_De_Large » Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:25 pm

Future HOF:
KAT

Future all-stars:
Booker
Porzingis
Russell (not sure, hv to see more of him)
Turner

If keep healthy allstars:
Okafor
Mudiay

Great role players:
Winslow
Stanley Johnson
Hezonja

Bust:
WCS
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,697
And1: 67,361
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#134 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:32 pm

yitur wrote:
cyclix wrote:


Damn, I forgot about Winslow. He is in the Kawhi-Butler mold, hope he improves like they did but maybe not like Kawhi levels, that would be scary.


I know he gets compared to those two a lot but I see more of a Iggy 2.0 in him. Elite defender that can defend 1-4 and with his ball handling, vision and ability to slash hes best on offense as a point forward. He is going to be a stat sheet stuffer.
User avatar
cyclix
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,247
And1: 4,636
Joined: Dec 05, 2013
       

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#135 » by cyclix » Fri Oct 28, 2016 8:39 pm

I agree. Winslow has more point forward skills than Kawhi/Butler/PG13 w/o the scoring mentality, or shooting. Iggy is a better comparison. Winslow should be used in the way that Giannis is used in Milwaukee.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#136 » by Alex_De_Large » Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:50 pm

dark horse as possible allstar:
Wade Baldwin
User avatar
Goudelock
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,306
And1: 20,938
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
Location: College of Charleston
 

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#137 » by Goudelock » Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:56 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:Pretty remarkable soph class - KAT, Porzingis, Turner looking like star bigs. Russell and Booker looking like star scorers. Winslow looking good as a star utility guy. Plenty of potential still for Johnson/Hezonja.

Okafor the biggest disappointment of the lotto guys, IMO. WCS and Kaminsky pretty much what people expected at the time.


You know it was a good class when Jahlil Okafor is the disappointing player of the group.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,697
And1: 67,361
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#138 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 1:11 am

So far through 3 games Justise Winslow has been asked to make a huge stride in his offensive game compared to last year. Running a lot more of as a Point forward, tied for first on the team in shot attempts. He cant hit anything from deep still, but has been pretty effective inside the arc bumping his % to 51% inside the arc.

Played Kawhi pretty evenly yesterday, Kawhi got a bunch of his #s when Miami had to take Justise off of him because of foul trouble in the 4th.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,697
And1: 67,361
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#139 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 1:13 am

Also want to give a little shout out to Kevon Looney. Still not getting too many minutes but in his limited minutes it seems like he has the potential to be a solid rotation big in a couple years. The dude just has a knack on how to rebound.
vxmike
Head Coach
Posts: 6,658
And1: 4,568
Joined: Sep 24, 2014
 

Re: Sophomore Impressions 2016-17 

Post#140 » by vxmike » Tue Nov 1, 2016 1:25 am

Slartibartfast wrote:Pretty remarkable soph class - KAT, Porzingis, Turner looking like star bigs. Russell and Booker looking like star scorers. Winslow looking good as a star utility guy. Plenty of potential still for Johnson/Hezonja.

Okafor the biggest disappointment of the lotto guys, IMO. WCS and Kaminsky pretty much what people expected at the time.


I still can't believe CHA turned down (4) first round picks for Kaminsky. I think first round picks are overrated, but that was beyond stupid.

This draft drops off in quality fast after Booker at 13 though. Few of the bottom 15 first round picks are looking like rotation level NBA players.

Return to The General Board