80sballboy wrote:I'm not giving up on Beal yet, but I'm close. I think he might be just too nice a kid, maybe too religious to be an assassin on the floor. Maybe he needs to call Steph Curry, who is very religious but kicks ass on the floor. It's all mental with him. Dude you got your contract and now you seem to be pressing. I'm starting to fear a Juwan Howard situation where he starts pressing at home and the fans start to boo him. He becomes the scapegoat. Hope it doesn't come to that but it's starting to feel a little like Juwan. Good player but not worthy of superstar deal.
The problem with Beal is that he really isn't that great of a shooter. Everything else about his game is fine. He's tries to attack the rim when appropriate. He plays hard on D (except for much of last year). He plays within the offense. He passes well. He rebounds adequately for his position. He finishes well on the break. In fact, I'd say he has made great strides this season in his ball handling and footwork to allow him to get to the rim much better. Overall he LOOKS good.
But if you look at the numbers, he is an utterly mediocre shooter from midrange and from the free throw line. And even his 3P%, while looking respectable on the percentages, is tainted by a low volume of attempts. There are lots of NBA players who can hit 39% from behind the arc if they only shoot when wide open.
Beal's career average on long 2's is 35%. Most power forwards shoot better than that. His 78% FT% last year ranked 50th out of 70 players 6-3 to 6-7 with 1500 minutes played. His shooting sure hasn't improved so far this season either.
Ask anyone about John Wall and they'll tell you he's a great player with an Achilles heel of being a poor shooter. That's a pretty fair and accurate assessment. Now consider that John Wall shot BETTER than Bradley Beal on long 2's last year, and shot just 3% worse on 3-pointers despite 82% of his makes being unassisted. So how in the hell does Beal get a reputation for being a great shooter?