The Regime wrote:The real Sam Bradford is back.
All it took was a shell shocking from the Eagles to bring him back.
Moderator: bwgood77
The Regime wrote:The real Sam Bradford is back.
DirtybirdGA wrote:Vikings would be pissed if they don't take advantage of the GB loss.
bwgood77 wrote:Up by 2 in fantasy now with my opponent having Cutler, Asiata and Walsh. Looks like I lose but I figured at this point Chicago would mostly run while Minnesota would pass and not kick field goals. All this while leaving Carr and Prescott on the bench in favor of Stafford, who scored 13 fantasy points, while the other two scored 35 and 26.
Otis Driftwood wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Up by 2 in fantasy now with my opponent having Cutler, Asiata and Walsh. Looks like I lose but I figured at this point Chicago would mostly run while Minnesota would pass and not kick field goals. All this while leaving Carr and Prescott on the bench in favor of Stafford, who scored 13 fantasy points, while the other two scored 35 and 26.
Tough to miss that one...
bwgood77 wrote:OnceUponADime wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Pretty crazy after 8 weeks no one with a losing record in the NFC West. No one with a negative pt differential in the AFC West, and the Chargers at 3-5, have a better pt differential than the Raiders, at 6-2.
That's cause the Chargers can rarely finish a close game.
Once again...ball at the 2 yard line and Chargers have Melvin Gordon who has been amazing this season and they don't even give it to him once and rather throw the ball 4 times against Denver's prolific secondary.
Sums up the game
http://www.sbnation.com/2016/10/30/13473870/san-diego-chargers-denver-broncos-final-score-2016-mike-mccoy?yptr=yahoo
Also, with McCoy being conservative I was shocked he went for 2. Typically I go for two in many similar circumstances, but I thought for sure they'd miss it, and that Denver would kick a FG to put them up by 8, and the Chargers would lose by 2 at the end. It didn't happen but it should have.
I'm not entirely sure Rivers doesn't audible out of runs because we were often running on 1st and 2nd down most of the game. He's even said once that he prefers to pass with 1 play on the one, because there are more options, but against that pass rush it's ridiculous. I would have rather run 3 times.
Return to The General NFL Board