Back again: Getting OKC a wing

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,145
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#121 » by bwgood77 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 2:47 pm

dbrandon wrote:
nowyouknow wrote:Brown is the #3 pick and has a higher upside than anyone on the Nuggets.


I don't know how else to say this.

This is a really dumb take. Mudiay? Murray? Jokic?


He's really high on Brown. That's unlikely to change despite any discussion so discussion regarding it is likely pointless.
User avatar
Mich3006
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 3,682
Joined: Jul 04, 2009
Location: Lower Bavaria, Germany
     

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#122 » by Mich3006 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 2:54 pm

OKC should look to aquire a guy like Rudy Gay, that´s the only wing with solid game who´d be available without trading key assets
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#123 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 2:55 pm

Agree with the above.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#124 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Nov 2, 2016 3:19 pm

I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,598
And1: 98,947
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#125 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Nov 2, 2016 3:32 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


I still think he's available, but you are going to have to provide the Kings with a guy who can replace his offense. Tough to get him to OKC without a 3rd team.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,421
And1: 9,949
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#126 » by penbeast0 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 4:10 pm

Thornton is a wing and Wiz Board fans would be happy to deal him but you are going to have to give us a couple of legs back. Original recipe please.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#127 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Nov 2, 2016 4:44 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Thornton is a wing and Wiz Board fans would be happy to deal him but you are going to have to give us a couple of legs back. Original recipe please.


Could you see Porter or Oubre coming available at some point?
Image
SV1113
Junior
Posts: 398
And1: 84
Joined: Jul 17, 2014
     

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#128 » by SV1113 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 4:57 pm

Bojan Bogdanovic & Chris Mccollugh for Kanter and Payne

thunder giving up more talent, but Nets take on a huge amount of salary to make this work
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#129 » by bondom34 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 5:00 pm

SV1113 wrote:Bojan Bogdanovic & Chris Mccollugh for Kanter and Payne

thunder giving up more talent, but Nets take on a huge amount of salary to make this work

There's no reason for OKC to give up talent to drop salary. They're not in the tax and won't create enough space to do anything with it.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#130 » by spearsy23 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 5:01 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


I still think he's available, but you are going to have to provide the Kings with a guy who can replace his offense. Tough to get him to OKC without a 3rd team.

I think he's available, but you'll have to pay full price.SInce People have always questioned rather or not he was worth it to begin with, I just don't see a way he gets traded unless/ until the kings fall out of the playoff picture and are willing to part with him at a mini discount.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,598
And1: 98,947
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#131 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Nov 2, 2016 5:09 pm

bondom34 wrote:
SV1113 wrote:Bojan Bogdanovic & Chris Mccollugh for Kanter and Payne

thunder giving up more talent, but Nets take on a huge amount of salary to make this work

There's no reason for OKC to give up talent to drop salary. They're not in the tax and won't create enough space to do anything with it.



The Thunder would need to have another deal lined up taking advantage of the big Kanter TPE because you could structure that deal to give OKC a TPE for his full contract.

I don't know what player who'd make much difference would be available tho just for taking on his contract since the Thunder have no assets left to attach to it.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,421
And1: 9,949
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#132 » by penbeast0 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 7:15 pm

dbrandon wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:Thornton is a wing and Wiz Board fans would be happy to deal him but you are going to have to give us a couple of legs back. Original recipe please.


Could you see Porter or Oubre coming available at some point?


Could I, sure, just as you could see Adams or Oladipo coming available. But, likely, no. Other than big money Beal, they are about the only developmental talent on the team that could improve and the team needs to improve so they would probably be overvalued by the Wiz.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
JoJoEmbiid
Senior
Posts: 524
And1: 151
Joined: Oct 22, 2016
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#133 » by JoJoEmbiid » Wed Nov 2, 2016 7:54 pm

bondom34 wrote:So wait, it matters Okafor got into it with a fan on the street and not Smart on the court? That's an odd standard.


You just became my favorite person on realgm.
becorz
Veteran
Posts: 2,654
And1: 507
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#134 » by becorz » Wed Nov 2, 2016 7:56 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


I still think he's available, but you are going to have to provide the Kings with a guy who can replace his offense. Tough to get him to OKC without a 3rd team.

I think he's available, but you'll have to pay full price.SInce People have always questioned rather or not he was worth it to begin with, I just don't see a way he gets traded unless/ until the kings fall out of the playoff picture and are willing to part with him at a mini discount.

I think the Kings, at this point, would have to fall WAY out of the playoff picture for Gay to be available, given the type of assets teams might be willing to give for him. I have watched all the Kings games this year and he is the only one on the team who can get offense on their own. MAYBE this gets better once Collison gets back (Temple is definitely not a playmaker and Lawson has been playing with Gay and Cousins) but I really don't see it happening. If the Kings are in the hunt, then they would have to get a scorer back and I don't think that is available. But if they are way out of the race, I could see him traded for picks. But the optimistic Kings fan in me says the team will be within striking distance of the 8 seed all year.
bleeds_purple
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 1,809
Joined: May 22, 2014

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#135 » by bleeds_purple » Wed Nov 2, 2016 8:55 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:I'm not sold that Gay is available. Having watched their last game, he is the only player not named Cousins who can create or score. And they want to be competitive. I think Gay might just get enough touches and shots to be some version of happy, and the Kings might get enough offense out of him to be some version of happy, and the whole thing is setting up for a Gay re-signing next summer that will leave a bunch of us wondering wait what just happened. (And then blow up 6 months later).


I still think he's available, but you are going to have to provide the Kings with a guy who can replace his offense. Tough to get him to OKC without a 3rd team.


Can't see us moving Gay at this point. Our position of need is PF. I'll certainly get flamed for saying this but moving Gay would require us getting a package back along the lines of Millsap and Korver. In other words, he's not going to get traded so long as we believe we're in the playoff hunt.

And its pretty much exactly as stated above, he's too important for us as a scorer right now and he's honestly playing the best two-way ball of his career through five games. Rather refreshing having a coach who actually tailors the system toward his best players. What a crazy concept!
nowyouknow
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 88
Joined: Aug 27, 2016

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#136 » by nowyouknow » Wed Nov 2, 2016 9:13 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
nowyouknow wrote:Brown is the #3 pick and has a higher upside than anyone on the Nuggets.


I don't know how else to say this.

This is a really dumb take. Mudiay? Murray? Jokic?


He's really high on Brown. That's unlikely to change despite any discussion so discussion regarding it is likely pointless.


[youtube]http://www.nba.com/article/2016/11/02/rookie-ladder-week-1-joel-embiid-minutes-restrictions[/youtube]

Sorry in advance, and please feel free to love this into the Celtics related thread but I felt I should just leave this here.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#137 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Nov 2, 2016 9:22 pm

Hey, anyone remember Michael Carter-Williams and the first 3 games of his rookie season?

yeah me neither
Image
nowyouknow
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 88
Joined: Aug 27, 2016

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#138 » by nowyouknow » Wed Nov 2, 2016 9:51 pm

This would be both an attack and derailing. Take a break.
User avatar
NashtyNas
RealGM
Posts: 10,261
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#139 » by NashtyNas » Wed Nov 2, 2016 10:00 pm

N.Mirotic, D.McDermott, C.Payne to Denver
Kanter, Singler, Barton, OKC 1st to CHI
Lopez, Chandler, Grant to OKC

Westbrook/Grant
Oladipo/Morrow
Chandler/Roberson
Sabonis/Ilyasova
Adams/Lopez

DEN might say no because Murray's probably not ready to start or play 30 minutes a game yet and therefore Barton is probably too important right now. In my fantasy world, I really like that for all teams though - playing Jokic and Nurkic together is an experiment that needs to stop.
Image

The underappreciated greats:
Image

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#140 » by Andre Roberstan » Wed Nov 2, 2016 10:51 pm

I_Socrates wrote:N.Mirotic, D.McDermott, C.Payne to Denver
Kanter, Singler, Barton, OKC 1st to CHI
Lopez, Chandler, Grant to OKC

Westbrook/Grant
Oladipo/Morrow
Chandler/Roberson
Sabonis/Ilyasova
Adams/Lopez

DEN might say no because Murray's probably not ready to start or play 30 minutes a game yet and therefore Barton is probably too important right now. In my fantasy world, I really like that for all teams though - playing Jokic and Nurkic together is an experiment that needs to stop.


I kind of like this for CHI and OKC, though I doubt CHI would go for it. This doesn't directionally seem like something that DEN would do—IMO they're looking more for consolidation trades than anything else, and the pieces they get back aren't as good as the ones they send out.
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions