ImageImageImageImage

This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass

Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#1 » by Orlwillbeback » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:17 am

He's not 27

Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#2 » by Skin » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:25 am

Soooo you're saying we can sign him for cheap this summer? Preach on brother!
:rockon:
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,010
And1: 17,807
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#3 » by Jstock12 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:27 am

Those are some amazing athletic plays. But they're more like eye-candy than anything else. Ibaka was going for a block on every single possible shot in those years (same as Whiteside), which is not an intelligent defense. Blocks is a useless stat. You can average 3 blocks a game and be a horrid rim protector. All that matters is DFG%.
SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,582
And1: 3,257
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#4 » by SHAQ32 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:31 am

27 or 35, either way he's been trash.
Edual
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#5 » by Edual » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:44 am

Jstock12 wrote:3 blocks a game and be a horrid rim protector

True, id rather have 3 blocks a game and be a horrid rim protector, instead of 0 blocks a game and still a horrid rim protector
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#6 » by Orlwillbeback » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:50 am

Edual wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:3 blocks a game and be a horrid rim protector

True, id rather have 3 blocks a game and be a horrid rim protector, instead of 0 blocks a game and still a horrid rim protector


Agreed

More fun that way
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#7 » by Orlwillbeback » Tue Nov 8, 2016 3:51 am

Skin wrote:Soooo you're saying we can sign him for cheap this summer? Preach on brother!
:rockon:


Well that is a bright side I suppose!
sportsrock37
Starter
Posts: 2,401
And1: 233
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
         

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#8 » by sportsrock37 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 4:32 am

Oladipo has a 10.3 PER. Sabonis 11.3 PER. Ibaka 16.3 PER. Talk as much **** about Ibaka as you want, because he has been very disappointing, but he's starting A LOT better than Oladipo has done for OKC.
Florida Gator Alum
Orlando Magic
Atlanta Braves
Washington Redskins
Washington Capitals

@badamsufl
User avatar
JF5
RealGM
Posts: 12,199
And1: 4,163
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
Location: Disney World, Florida

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#9 » by JF5 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 5:48 am

sportsrock37 wrote:Oladipo has a 10.3 PER. Sabonis 11.3 PER. Ibaka 16.3 PER. Talk as much **** about Ibaka as you want, because he has been very disappointing, but he's starting A LOT better than Oladipo has done for OKC.


At least the Thunder are 6-1...

Ibaka is putting up that per on a bad squad...
sportsrock37
Starter
Posts: 2,401
And1: 233
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
         

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#10 » by sportsrock37 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 6:00 am

JF5 wrote:
sportsrock37 wrote:Oladipo has a 10.3 PER. Sabonis 11.3 PER. Ibaka 16.3 PER. Talk as much **** about Ibaka as you want, because he has been very disappointing, but he's starting A LOT better than Oladipo has done for OKC.


At least the Thunder are 6-1...

Ibaka is putting up that per on a bad squad...


Haha. Got it. My bad, Dipo would have solved all of the problems that we are currently having right now. With him we'd be 7-0. Worst trade EVER! Am I doing it right? We should trade 16.7 PER AG for 9.8 PER Richard Jefferson because he's on a winning team and AG is on a bad team.

Since when is 3-4 with 3 road losses to probable playoff teams constitute a bad squad? I had us at 4-3 right now with a win vs Miami and all the other results the exact same. The way we have lost is concerning, but did anyone really have us at better than 4-3 at this point in the year? It'll take time to gel.

This comment isn't directed solely at you, but it's almost like you guys would rather us of lost the 3 games we won just so you could say "I told you so" even more than you are right now when we aren't a bad team. Are you guys really going to do this after every loss this year? How is that fun to follow a team that makes you so angry?
Florida Gator Alum
Orlando Magic
Atlanta Braves
Washington Redskins
Washington Capitals

@badamsufl
ORL_on_FIRE
Starter
Posts: 2,165
And1: 1,854
Joined: Jan 18, 2016
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#11 » by ORL_on_FIRE » Tue Nov 8, 2016 6:02 am

My mans defense has slipped.
User avatar
JF5
RealGM
Posts: 12,199
And1: 4,163
Joined: Jul 23, 2010
Location: Disney World, Florida

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#12 » by JF5 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 6:54 am

sportsrock37 wrote:
JF5 wrote:
sportsrock37 wrote:Oladipo has a 10.3 PER. Sabonis 11.3 PER. Ibaka 16.3 PER. Talk as much **** about Ibaka as you want, because he has been very disappointing, but he's starting A LOT better than Oladipo has done for OKC.


At least the Thunder are 6-1...

Ibaka is putting up that per on a bad squad...


Haha. Got it. My bad, Dipo would have solved all of the problems that we are currently having right now. With him we'd be 7-0. Worst trade EVER! Am I doing it right? We should trade 16.7 PER AG for 9.8 PER Richard Jefferson because he's on a winning team and AG is on a bad team.

Since when is 3-4 with 3 road losses to probable playoff teams constitute a bad squad? I had us at 4-3 right now with a win vs Miami and all the other results the exact same. The way we have lost is concerning, but did anyone really have us at better than 4-3 at this point in the year? It'll take time to gel.

This comment isn't directed solely at you, but it's almost like you guys would rather us of lost the 3 games we won just so you could say "I told you so" even more than you are right now when we aren't a bad team. Are you guys really going to do this after every loss this year? How is that fun to follow a team that makes you so angry?


1. I didn't say that... I'm saying even though Oladipo's per is low it doesn't mean him and Ibaka are on the same level at this point. Eye test wise its easy see that as well as Ibaka thus far has been atrocious.

2. 3-4... 2 of those wins are from a Sixers team that is 0-6, and a John Wall-less Washington team that is 1-5. Not adding the fact that the Magic were trailing against both teams by double digits at various points of each game, to which they had to come back and defeat them in the final minutes. At least for the Kings they were beating throughout... This team has been down double digits in every single game besides the Sacramento game, and you're saying its not concerning until now?

And that "needs some time to gel" phrase is crap. Everyone in the NBA is trying to get their **** together with new guys/schemes. And even if the Magic do "gel", are we assuming other teams won't do the same? Losing by 15-20 on a nightly basis is just unacceptable... no matter how you excuse it.
Bergmaniac
General Manager
Posts: 7,500
And1: 11,282
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#13 » by Bergmaniac » Tue Nov 8, 2016 9:05 am

He's not 27


He must've aged incredibly fast over the summer then since he looked way better only six months ago during the playoffs. All of his stats show this, this for example - http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201586/tracking/defense/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Playoffs . He wasn't as spectacular as in 2012, but he was a very effective defender.

In the 2015/16 regular season opponents shot 43.6 at the rim when Ibaka was defending those shots. This year that percentage is 63.3%. Small sample size and all, but this is a huge difference. He is been downright terrible at protecting the rim.
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,319
And1: 7,806
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#14 » by RookieStar » Tue Nov 8, 2016 9:38 am

Sooo.... is everyone saying that instead of getting a unicorn, we got ourselves a lemon?
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#15 » by Orlwillbeback » Tue Nov 8, 2016 9:48 am

Bergmaniac wrote:
He's not 27


He must've aged incredibly fast over the summer then since he looked way better only six months ago during the playoffs. All of his stats show this, this for example - http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201586/tracking/defense/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Playoffs . He wasn't as spectacular as in 2012, but he was a very effective defender.

In the 2015/16 regular season opponents shot 43.6 at the rim when Ibaka was defending those shots. This year that percentage is 63.3%. Small sample size and all, but this is a huge difference. He is been downright terrible at protecting the rim.


All you need to look at is his decline in blocks and fg% over the past few years for entire seasons.

The playoffs was a small sample, and even then he was probably shot up full of PEDs at the time.
Bergmaniac
General Manager
Posts: 7,500
And1: 11,282
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
 

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#16 » by Bergmaniac » Tue Nov 8, 2016 10:02 am

With every OKC game I watch this season I get more mad ot Hennigan for giving them Domantas Sabonis in the Ibaka trade. The guy is really talented and is already contributing on a good team. He can shoot the 3, he already has a nice post game and plays solid D (he gets whistled for a lot of fouls but a lot of them are BS ones given because NBA refs hate rookies). And he is a very good passer for a big.
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,041
And1: 19,046
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#17 » by pepe1991 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 10:04 am

It doesn't even matter is he 27 or 33,what matters is fact that he has no leaping ability left in him, lost lot of mobility and plays horrific defense. He is also bad rebounder for years now and guy can't pass to save his life
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#18 » by Orlwillbeback » Tue Nov 8, 2016 10:14 am

pepe1991 wrote:It doesn't even matter is he 27 or 33,what matters is fact that he has no leaping ability left in him, lost lot of mobility and plays horrific defense. He is also bad rebounder for years now and guy can't pass to save his life


Age has a lot to do with that
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,041
And1: 19,046
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#19 » by pepe1991 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 10:23 am

Orlwillbeback wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:It doesn't even matter is he 27 or 33,what matters is fact that he has no leaping ability left in him, lost lot of mobility and plays horrific defense. He is also bad rebounder for years now and guy can't pass to save his life


Age has a lot to do with that


You can still be good at age of 32 (Look Lebron, he is turning 33 in few months) ,problem is his real life decline that nobody can hide. Sure ,if he is 27 he will get max deal, if he is 33 he won't , but i'm not talking about salary situation but his playing right now. He simply isn't worth max deals, he isn't worth of big money since 2013.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,041
And1: 19,046
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: This is the Ibaka we were supposed to get 

Post#20 » by pepe1991 » Tue Nov 8, 2016 10:32 am

Orlwillbeback wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:It doesn't even matter is he 27 or 33,what matters is fact that he has no leaping ability left in him, lost lot of mobility and plays horrific defense. He is also bad rebounder for years now and guy can't pass to save his life


Age has a lot to do with that


You can still be good at age of 32 (Look Lebron, he is turning 33 in few months) ,problem is his real life decline that nobody can hide. Sure ,if he is 27 he will get max deal, if he is 33 he won't , but i'm not talking about salary situation but his playing right now. He simply isn't worth max deals, he isn't worth of big money since 2013.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon

Return to Orlando Magic