ImageImageImage

Only hypothetical.yes or no

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

pistons4ever
Junior
Posts: 403
And1: 142
Joined: Jul 03, 2016
         

Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#1 » by pistons4ever » Wed Nov 9, 2016 10:53 am

Baynes kcp to gsw
Cousins to gsw

Green and thompson to Detroit

Harris morris and perhaps a pic of gsw to kings

On espn we would be -11 but think that is cause thompson has bad numbers right Now


Of course our Bench would be weaker but the s5
Drummond green Johnson Thompson jackson sounds well rounded
pistons4ever
Junior
Posts: 403
And1: 142
Joined: Jul 03, 2016
         

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#2 » by pistons4ever » Wed Nov 9, 2016 11:01 am

Kings want more for Boogie...but they will Never get one of the top Guys like a.davis .towns or something like that
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,857
And1: 3,449
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#3 » by theBigLip » Wed Nov 9, 2016 5:02 pm

The longer Sactown waits on Cousins, the less they will get for him. I do like a KCP for Thompson trade - would be good for both teams.
WC NBA Fan
Junior
Posts: 435
And1: 191
Joined: Aug 28, 2011

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#4 » by WC NBA Fan » Wed Nov 9, 2016 5:29 pm

I like it for the Pistons but I don't see GSW doing it especially when you consider that Klay and Green are on bargain contracts considering the type of money that flew around this past off season. Throwing in a possible pic to Sacramento just makes it worse for them.

I've never been a fan of Boogie so while getting Morris and Harris in exchange for him would seem like a good idea on paper, it just crowds their forward rotation even more. You'd now have 4 small forwards with Morris, Gay, Barnes and Casspi. They'd have to follow it up with a trade that would dump one of their SF's on some under the cap team like Philly or something.

Dump Gay on the Sixers and you have the making of a good trade for Detroit and Sacramento but you still have the GS angle. Taking on a toxic cancer like Cousins in exchange for 2 all stars on bargain contracts is risky. You also have to remember that Curry and Durant are free agents this summer. With the current roster, they probably stay put. Bring in a cancer like Cousins who won't coddle towards them because they're franchise players and you might just be blowing up a potential dynasty. Just not worth the risk.

All in all, good thinking though. I still like it for the other teams and on paper, a Curry/Durant/Cousins threesome would be a fantasy leaguers wet dream. Just can't see it working on the court or on the spreadsheet long term. I say spreadsheet because Cousins, Durant and Curry pretty much cap you out right there. In order to justify sending out Klay and Draymond, you most likely would have to resign KCP so you're looking at another 15-20 million there as well. You'd have to pray that Boogie doesn't ruin things then hope that the depth created by late draft picks and minimum salary players would be enough.
coordinator0
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 1,383
Joined: Nov 11, 2008

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#5 » by coordinator0 » Wed Nov 9, 2016 7:27 pm

Yeah, not enough for Cousins. Sacramento won't ever get another star for him but Harris and Morris with a late future Golden State pick would be awful. WC does a good job explaining why it doesn't really work for the Warriors either. DeMarcus being a huge pain in the locker room isn't just hyperbole. Way too much smoke for there not to be fire for that particular issue. And then there's the money, which doesn't work going forward at all and leaves Golden State very little to work with to upgrade outside of a re-signed Curry and a re-signed Durant alongside Cousins. Don't think Kerr wants to play that way anyways.

I would do it for Detroit. Sending out Caldwell-Pope, Harris, Morris, and Baynes is a pretty big shakeup but getting Green and Thompson back in return is more than worth it. Works out pretty well getting an elite secondary facilitator in the starting lineup with Jackson and an elite defender to pair with him in the backcourt to make up for his shortcomings there.

Golden State still isn't ever going to trade Draymond though. ;)
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#6 » by The Penguin » Wed Nov 9, 2016 8:47 pm

Golden State isn't going to trade Green & Klay, especially not for anything we have to give them.


A deal I think would be interesting, but I believe both sides would think they are giving too much is:

Klay for KCP / Stanimal / Baynes

GSW can plug KCP into Klay's spot, develop Stanimal as Iggy's replacement and help address their big man problem with Baynes. We add one of the best shooters and best 2 guards in the league in Klay to help give our lineup legitimate floor spacing. But again, I think Pistons fans would say we are giving up too much and I don't think Warriors fans think they are getting enough.
User avatar
Manocad
RealGM
Posts: 69,969
And1: 10,562
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: Middle Fingerton
Contact:
       

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#7 » by Manocad » Wed Nov 9, 2016 9:38 pm

Golden State does this why?
Image
User avatar
Timmaytime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,890
And1: 1,717
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
Location: Beer City, USA
 

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#8 » by Timmaytime » Wed Nov 9, 2016 10:14 pm

It'd be hard enough to get Green OR Thompson let alone both
ComboGuardCity wrote:If Bellinelli drops 50 and we lose I’ll eat my dog
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,265
And1: 9,750
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#9 » by tmorgan » Wed Nov 9, 2016 10:53 pm

Detroit does this instantly, but that's because you don't get two top 20ish players for KCP, Morris, Harris, and Baynes. Not even close.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,969
And1: 4,896
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Re: Only hypothetical.yes or no 

Post#10 » by ComboGuardCity » Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:13 am

Warriors give a hypothetical hell no

Return to Detroit Pistons