ImageImageImageImageImage

Is West Trash (so far)?

Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51

Is West Trash (so far)?

Yes
7
20%
No
28
80%
 
Total votes: 35

likashing
Head Coach
Posts: 6,560
And1: 1,959
Joined: Jun 06, 2013

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#61 » by likashing » Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:25 am

FNQ wrote:I would 10x10 times take Speights over him though, mainly because Speights is extremely underrated as a big-time offensive weapon off the bench, as well as a solid rebounder. West has provided the rebounding, and extra steals, but is a ways away from Speights scoring wise. But I expect West's outlandish steal #s to drop as well, to the mean.


Speights' scoring is inefficient, inconsistent and overrated. Fans enjoy him because he would go on a hot streak once in a while. For every big shot he makes, he throws up a handful of bricks.

In addition, his body of work is negative overall due to his poor defense and overrated scoring ability. His real RPM was consistently low. His ts% is nothing to write home about either.

Speights:
14-15: rpm = -1.45 ts% .536
15-16: rpm = -1.24 ts% .504

And you mentioned about rebounding... West's defensive rebound % (drb%) is low so far right now, but when he is on-court, the team drb% is up. Like I said, he is a team player. He boxes out so the TEAM gets the rebound, it may not always be him ending up the box score rebound. His career personal drb% has been ~19% as well, about the same as Speights, so I am not too worried.

If you look at Speights' effect on drb%, we rebound worse when he's on (not to mention about giving up more points).

16-17 team drb% 74.0%
west on drb% 75.6%

15-16 team drb% 76.1%
speights on drb% 73.4%

14-15 team drb% 74.5%
speights on drb% 72.7%


**I only look at drb% because for our team, orb% is not too important because we are already #1 on offense and our team ts% is super high**

West is better than Speights now, and I believe West won't regress to be worse than Speights.

I am so glad Speights is gone and West is here.
Mark Jackson wrote:Playoff preparation is overrated... I’m going to get my rest. I’m not going to grow old and be stressed out and get gray hair.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#62 » by FNQ » Sat Nov 12, 2016 12:40 am

10 games.

His TS was actually .546 in 14-15, slumped last year.. and if we're using West's 10 game sample as a comparison, why not Speights' this year too? He's at .576 so far. Speights' job is to score on units that don't have primary scoring options, and as a backup spark plug, he does that well. In 10 minute bursts, he does that well. Having a rebound rate of 15-16.. that's pretty good. And West's team rebounding, while a good narrative for this year, didn't really apply last year (-1.4%) or the prior years in Indiana (-3%, -0.4%, -1.6%). And that pairs with his average 12-13 rebound rate, compared to Speights' 15-16%.

So the whole West as a team rebounder is a new narrative based on 10 games and historically has not been true. Maybe old dogs learn new tricks at 36, but everything points to looking way too hard into outliers to find the result you want. That's just what the data says.
likashing
Head Coach
Posts: 6,560
And1: 1,959
Joined: Jun 06, 2013

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#63 » by likashing » Sat Nov 12, 2016 1:32 am

We will see.

Speight's rebounding, defense, and negative RPM is a really low bar to clear though.
Mark Jackson wrote:Playoff preparation is overrated... I’m going to get my rest. I’m not going to grow old and be stressed out and get gray hair.
User avatar
jason bourne
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,728
And1: 1,602
Joined: Dec 23, 2013
 

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#64 » by jason bourne » Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:13 am

West was worthwhile having two years ago when he was on the Pacers, but then faded down the stretch. He's a SAS castoff and we got suckered in imho. Also, SAS took Dewayne Dedmon which made us settle for JaVale. I haven't seen SP8 this year, so will have to defer to those here who have.
“The most contrarian thing of all is not to oppose the crowd but to think for yourself.” Peter Thiel

ImageImage
User avatar
marthafokker
General Manager
Posts: 8,541
And1: 1,039
Joined: Jul 13, 2004

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#65 » by marthafokker » Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:39 pm

Hope Kerr put McGee first before West like last game. Even Looney came in before West.

My eye test tells me West cannot play the 5 at his age. He is a perfect 9th guy right now.
TB wrote:
We finally have a team for Nellie.... bring the old drunk back.
turk3d
RealGM
Posts: 36,652
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Javale McGee, Dubs X Factor

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#66 » by turk3d » Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:06 pm

I totally agree that West would do a lot better playing 4 (he'd be an ideal backup for Draymond). I don't know if Kerr's tried it, but I think if he were paired with Dray from time to time, he might function a lot better (rather than pairing him with KD).
Draymond Green: Exemplifies Warrior Leadership, Hustle, Desire, Versatility, Toughness, fearlessness, Grit, Heart,Team Spirit, Sacrifice
Image
User avatar
FloydWarrior
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 191
Joined: Jul 04, 2016
Location: Portugal
 

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#67 » by FloydWarrior » Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:16 am

He's been so so...but at 36 I'm not keeping my hopes too high in terms of him getting better as the season goes on.
Image
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 20,958
And1: 8,724
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#68 » by cpower » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:05 am

I think I will rank our big man like this:
looney, McGee/West, Zaza.
In the end , Zaza's stats will look the best because he played with starters and McGee will look the worst because he played with the 3rd strings. I think we should play other big men as starters just to see how they perform.
User avatar
Mylie10
RealGM
Posts: 41,240
And1: 9,618
Joined: Sep 16, 2005
Location: * Chokers! *
Contact:
     

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#69 » by Mylie10 » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:04 pm

He's fine, I just think certain games are to fast for him, and he should never be the lone big out there. I'm going to rail on that last fact the entire year if Kerr doesn't pull his head out on that one.
Khoee wrote “
Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
Left*My*Heart
RealGM
Posts: 14,229
And1: 641
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Baja Oklahoma

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#70 » by Left*My*Heart » Mon Nov 14, 2016 5:46 pm

West chose to leave the Spurs, by declining his option. They may have been okay with him leaving, but thought I read they assumed he was staying with the team.

Not sure what exactly happened with the Warriors trying to re-sign Speights. They were supposedly interested in re-signing him, but then he took the minimum with the Clips. Might have been the front office's decision of West over Speights, but even at that, Speights would be a lot better than McAdoo off the bench.

The front office said they wanted to get tougher and West is tougher than Speights and typically plays better defense. The inability to spread the floor like Speights could, makes me prefer Speights. West should be more consistent in what he provides. I think the 5 has been a challenge for him early on.
Phase 3
Veteran
Posts: 2,547
And1: 758
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
Location: Bay Area
     

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#71 » by Phase 3 » Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:21 pm

I thought he would be more of a presence inside but he's really not at this stage of his career. But for the vet minimum, there was no risk at all in finding out if he could still play.
User avatar
and1GS
RealGM
Posts: 25,386
And1: 2,728
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#72 » by and1GS » Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:32 pm

I think he's going to be helpful in the long run. I can't imagine that Looney/McGee will be calm and composed once we hit the playoffs.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you" :lol: :lol:

KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#73 » by FNQ » Mon Nov 14, 2016 7:02 pm

likashing wrote:We will see.

Speight's rebounding, defense, and negative RPM is a really low bar to clear though.


His RPM was worse than I thought, but in most cases that I remember, bench scorers that clearly aren't good enough to be starters usually had a negative RAPM, but when I looked half-assedly I couldn't find a reason for why that seemed to be true across the board
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#74 » by SF_Warriors » Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:51 am

Yes and no.

For the price we got him at, cannot complain at all.

If zaza or dray is out, having a guy like west available could make a difference. West as a depth piece is more valuable than some of you may think.

I prefer them playing looney and mcgee over him, but given our lack of depth up front we need all the decent bodies we can get.
West is not a great nba center. He needs to have another big play alongside of him otherwise we are going to get killed by stronger teams.
User avatar
Splashin
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,296
And1: 1,537
Joined: Jun 21, 2016
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#75 » by Splashin » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:18 am

I think he'll come up big in a few key moments in the post season but he's tough to watch when I remember how good west was on the Pacers.
User avatar
and1GS
RealGM
Posts: 25,386
And1: 2,728
Joined: Nov 12, 2008
Location: home of 4x champs, 1x AS starter, supporter of checkbook wins and all-time weakest moves
   

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#76 » by and1GS » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:22 am

Also keep in mind that Speights needed shots to get himself rolling offensively. With the way our team is structured, we have one of our big 3 scorers on the floor at all times. Not much flexibility to give Speights 3 straight shots on O with nobody to rebound for him. He reminded me a lot of Sasha Vujacic in LA. When he was in the game, he was getting his shots no matter what because there was an understanding his only job was to take deep J's.

I think West's ability to score down low will be big come playoff time. Also keep in mind that it took Speights about 2 years to figure out our defensive scheme due to such a low bball IQ. Here's hoping a hugely cerebral player like West shortens that learning curve significantly.
"The dynasty doesn't start with you, it starts after you" :lol: :lol:

KevinMcreynolds wrote:hopefully JK laid some pipe on the strip as well, gotta get those reps in
Kuya
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,929
And1: 816
Joined: Jun 18, 2013
         

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#77 » by Kuya » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:33 am

Splashin wrote:I think he'll come up big in a few key moments in the post season but he's tough to watch when I remember how good west was on the Pacers.


He'll be lucky to average 2 minutes a game.
Image
User avatar
gold0259
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,544
And1: 65
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: minneapolis

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#78 » by gold0259 » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:48 pm

Is he really playing at a discount?
Left*My*Heart
RealGM
Posts: 14,229
And1: 641
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Baja Oklahoma

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#79 » by Left*My*Heart » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:39 pm

Yes, he declined his player option with the Spurs to sign with us for somewhat less.

I think he will be much improved come playoff time. He is adjusting to a new team, new offense and a new defense. I don't expect him to score in double digits or rebound in double digits, just provide consistent quality play when he is in the lineup. He is built for the ruggedness of the playoffs and why our front office went after him in May of this year.
cdubbz
RealGM
Posts: 15,473
And1: 4,001
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Oakland
 

Re: Is West Trash (so far)? 

Post#80 » by cdubbz » Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:02 pm

Left*My*Heart wrote:Yes, he declined his player option with the Spurs to sign with us for somewhat less.

I think he will be much improved come playoff time. He is adjusting to a new team, new offense and a new defense. I don't expect him to score in double digits or rebound in double digits, just provide consistent quality play when he is in the lineup. He is built for the ruggedness of the playoffs and why our front office went after him in May of this year.


Sure. We also got him because we needed to sign any big for the veterans minimum lol. West will definitely help (i hope) when the pace is slowed down against some teams in playoffs. His ability to draw fouls in the paint during post ups will be valuable.
Kuya wrote: a good agent collects all the data, including quotes to give them leverage in contract deals.

Return to Golden State Warriors